But it is true that biden is pretty senile, he keeps forgetting words and saying all sorts of weird stuff. Im not saying that trump is better option, like i said many times. Both are crappy options that work for the same goal, even tho they would say different things. What does biden really want to do? Does he want free healthcare? Does he want free university degree education? Does he want a proper police reform?
Only thing he is running with is that he is not trump and they played bernie out, because bernie promised real change.
Again i dont think its better to vote for trump and i dont say its wrong to vote for the lesser evil. Im saying that there is no good option to vote and i dont condemn people who vote for biden or dont vote at all. Personally i dont think i would vote or i would go vote with some good fuck you letter or just vote for bernie even tho he is not on the race anymore.
It is a shame that you have bought into the lie.
Biden has a stutter,trolling a disability with the 'senile' trope it is about as classy as when Trump did this:
What is 'free healthcare'? Does he want to expand Obamacare to 100% of our population getting everyone affordable healthcare? Yes.
Obama tries and got really close to 100% coverage, but the current Republicans sued and stopped it from being an option in the Republican controlled states.
https://joebiden.com/beyondhs/
Biden plan is to invest in community colleges and to help the people who can't afford them.
He has a realistic plan for police reform that is not branded by Trump's troll army to scare the suburbs with stupid slogans like 'Defund the Police'.
Bernie was never an legitimate option,
he was propped up by the Russian military because that is who they wanted Trump to run against.
Yea well what does it take for a thing not to be a conspiracy? If no officials admit it but you can see it going on in front of your eyes. Is it a conspiracy anymore? Or does it just depend on how many people believe in it for it not to be a conspiracy anymore, even tho the officials would not admit it?
Except you are flawed in what you are 'seeing' and have seemingly brainwashed yourself into believing the propaganda traps.
Nah. I would not do violence and neither is it related to conspiracy theories. Im just saying that i would not condemn morally if people started shooting. Even tho it would be a bad move because the other side seems to want to make people do extreme things, so that they could put out new laws that inhibit freedom of speech or rights to protest. Therefore it would be extremely stupid for people to act violently. But it would be understandable and it would not be morally wrong to fight the oppressors.
And i dont say this lightly. Im not a 100% pacifist, but almost. I do believe in right for self-defence and how things are going on in the states. Well its already starting to get there here violence could be used for self-defence against tyranny. However it would not do any good, because it would just look bad and they would be made to look like the terrorists and that would only give more power to the elite.
I dont claim to know what would be the best way out of it, but i can think of many better ones than violence. However that would require so much that it might not be possible. Perhaps BLM folks can one day organise in such a way that they can make a difference without violence. I think what they are doing with trying to keep people from rioting, protesting peacefully and keeping protesting is likely the best way at the moment. But more and more of these protestors have been accused of shit by the media that they wont be tolerated by so many regular folks not that heavily into the subject anymore. Soon all normal people will start to hate BLM if the elite gets their way. Do you think they would lose here either? Im sure they would prefer that to a civil war, and they could then end it with passing some laws that people dont realise is for limiting the freedom of speech etc or general spying on people what ever they do in china that USA also wants to do.
I guess you are missing that these protests are peaceful, and that it can be seen that the violence is being done by people using them as cover to paint the BLM movement as 'radical' when it is not. Your use of BLM in this last paragraph is the definition of 'disinformation in the media' because you are typing lies about this movement in this forum, which is a form of media.
And the 'elites' don't need a civil war to win, they already won because they are 'elites', all they do is to stop any progress of people getting into the middle class.
Sorry but i dont see any evidence in there. Also new york times in not a media you should trust too much..
Like i said its common that different countries hack each others all the time. It doesent prove anything that russians have hacked some US government stuff.
Think about how the voting went. Who got more votes from people, hillary or trump? But who the elite puppets who have more power than regular citizens in voting decided to vote for and who ended up winning. So it looks like hillary was played out in reality by the USA elite, not russians.
You do see evidence in the NY Times reporting on a bi-partisan senate report about the Russians actually hacking their way into every single states election officials computers? Oh, no you are saying that the Russian military hacking into every states elections is not proof of their election meddling.
The hack of the electorate however was with 2 goals, to find the people that could be swayed with propaganda that Trump was an viable option for POTUS and get them pumped to vote, and to find the people who would never vote for Trump and to pump them so full of anti-Clinton propaganda and get them so sick of the election and government that they did not vote or voted 3rd party, as you can see in the numbers I posted that they hit pay dirt with the millions of more votes for non-viable candidates.
Our election system was built on a foundation of landowners (states) choosing the POTUS and senators, while the citizens vote in the House members.
Russians attacked over 100 million citizens and engaged with them over 9 billion times leading up to the elections, pretending all the while to be good ole Americans as they spread their lies. If you don't think they had the ability to sway the 80k votes when they knew the people they were targeting down to the districts they live in, I would like to introduce you to this Nigerian Prince who can make you rich.
Google cambridge analytica and their connections with trump folks before the elections. Also check out what the cambridge analytica has done in the past with others.
Also its the regular trumpsters who mostly put out this propaganda, not russians. Go look at the trumps official forums and you see what sort of crazy shit they spread around. Then they run around the internet trying to be some great warriors pushing out their crap.
Some from the left also fall into spreading propaganda. They dont need russian trolls for this. And even if russia did have trolls like that, it wouldnt matter much.
RIght, or I could just
point you to the Cambridge Analytica hearings and video they themselves put out leading to the elections where you can get everything you need without googling it. Do you really think that the Russian military and Trump trolls have much daylight? Do you really think that when you go to those Trump forums you are not also seeing many Russian trolls? Did you know that Cambridge Analytica also have been connected to the Russians?
"Even if Russia did have trolls like that" makes me think you are incredibly naive or just another foreign troll yourself.
I dont agree, but im not going to start to argue about it and try to prove jimmy.
