Blunt questions
- Thread starter Rivaldmans
- Start date
ganjman
New Member
You want some more info....? Cos you still dont seem to understand.
Surprisingly, the unfiltered joint outperformed all devices except the vaporizers, with a ratio of about 1 part cannabinoids to 13 parts tar. This disturbingly poor ratio may be explained by the low potency of the NIDA-supplied marijuana used in the study, which was around 2.3%.
Disappointingly, waterpipes performed uniformly worse than the unfiltered joint. The least bad waterpipe, the bong, produced 30% more tar per cannabinoids than the unfiltered joint. Ironically, the pipe with the electric mixer scored by far the worst of any device. This suggests that water filtration is actually counterproductive, apparently because water tends to absorb THC more readily than noxious tars. Like the waterpipes, the cigarette filter also performed worse than the unfiltered joint, by about 30%. Researchers speculate this is because cannabinoids are exceptionally sticky and adhere to other solids. Hence, any filtration system that picks up particulates is likely also to screen out cannabinoids.
Now - i must admit, i do expect an apology, and for you to say i was right all along.
Surprisingly, the unfiltered joint outperformed all devices except the vaporizers, with a ratio of about 1 part cannabinoids to 13 parts tar. This disturbingly poor ratio may be explained by the low potency of the NIDA-supplied marijuana used in the study, which was around 2.3%.
Now - i must admit, i do expect an apology, and for you to say i was right all along.
ganjman
New Member
I dont need to watch a youtube vid to know how wrong it is mate.
I'm sorry, i didnt want it to be like this... you made an argument - you were wrong.... i was right... and there we go. I was right. All along. Like normal. It's ok - i wont hold a grudge if you dont.
Pumert
Well-Known Member
2 things wrong with that study
1 that study was based on a ratio of THC to TAR not a percent of the total THC from the original bud
2machines are designed to flawlessly smoke a cigaret they do it all the time with tobaco studies well a human doesnt always flawlessly smoke a cigaret. and how many bong smoking robots r their???
also the CA chapter of normal said the original amount of THC you get from a joint is 28% are our other ways sooooooo inefiecient we get less than 28% of the original THC in the bud into our lungs??
ganjman
New Member
Hemp is anywhere near from 0.2 - 0.5%
I'm sorry mate, i rained all on your parade. Accept it you idiot. Dont keep making yourself look like a kid.
You dont understand. Give up.
Mysticlown150
Well-Known Member
All that bong shit is very unhealthy. From what knowledge I've gathered over the past several weeks I've learned that when you breathe all that bong smoke your breathing in water vapor also which is dangerous to your lungs. Also the water believe it or not does filter out thc more readily than it does tar (counterproductive for using a bong in the first place). I personally don't fuck with bongs unless it's at a party and even then I may take a hit and then roll a fat blunt.
ganjman
New Member
Because the shitty youtube crap you posted isnt scientific, it's bullshit opinion... they think they get highest from a bong... there you go, thats what they say. It's means nothing!
Pumert
Well-Known Member
It does filter more THC than Tar but you still get more THC than a blunt/joint
but i prefer blunts anyway they are the perfect spliff in a way
my 2 favorite blunts are these (I even have a rhyme for them)
favorite: Swisher Sweet itll knock you off your feet
2nd favorite: Optimo Peach itll have you suckin like a leech
Pumert
Well-Known Member
Its not an opinion the very same ppl you used in your source were also in my source
AND NO your a fucking retard you STILL havnt reviewed my source even though i have reiewed yours.
ganjman
New Member
Dont get worked up mate, i have no sound, i HAVE looked but i'd need sound... I told you to give up... im going to give up now too, because this is boring and pointless. I'm sorry you had to start the arguement. Some people eh?
ganjman
New Member
Again, you didnt read what i said. Give up, im not going to bother watching your youtube video of a source. It's a bloody joke.
Rivaldmans
Member
You guys sure can argue.. just smoke some weed and chill. Doesn't really matter what you use we all like to get high right?
Pumert
Well-Known Member
ITs just ridiculous i have proof that says a bong will get you more thc and he wont look at it.
And yes you are right
Pumert
Well-Known Member
O ya gangman ur an idiot u gave me plus rep and a negative message along with it. i think you ment to do somthing else but watevr also thanx for the boost in activitey and posts
and ya i looked thru some of ur posts and it looks like im not the only one who thought your an idiot.
and sense odds are i wont hear frum you again in this thread -Duces
For all the old ppl out there duces is term for a 2 card and 2 is the number of fingers you hold up when you says peace which also means goodbye. now our generation will come and deystroy most of what you helped build
and ya i looked thru some of ur posts and it looks like im not the only one who thought your an idiot.
and sense odds are i wont hear frum you again in this thread -Duces
For all the old ppl out there duces is term for a 2 card and 2 is the number of fingers you hold up when you says peace which also means goodbye. now our generation will come and deystroy most of what you helped build