Canadian Western Separation

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Now back to unity...Our country, at this point, is not and has not acted for the betterment of "All" for a long time..We all hope to act as a collective, but squabbled like fighting siblings. We all have our strengths and contributions..BC foresty, fishing mining, manufacturing, it vital access to the sea, Alberta energy, Sask and Manitoba energy and agriculture, Ontarion manufacturimg..you get my point.
Nova Scotia got hammered after confederation in 1867 to the benefit of Ontario and Ontario is in the same boat as the manufacturing centers in America now, in decline. Alberta's day in the sun may be short lived and an international (American) embargo on tar sands oil is very real possibility, in the not too distant future it might be treated like coal. Where I live we sit on vast supplies of coal and almost none of it is mined and very little is used locally either. The economic tides are changing constantly and ever year oil is becoming less important to the global economy, in a decade many cars will be electric. We have off shore oil on the Canadian east coast too and good future prospects for lot's more. Compared to the economic hammering the maritime's and Ontario have has taken in the past few decades Alberta has gotten away lightly.
The fact, that oil on the prairies is now having to move by rail car to the coast, which is less environmentally friendly..not to mention more risky, means that the decision to halt pipeline bottle-necks industries in Saskatchewan and Manitoba who require rail capacity presently being occupied by oil...Are the protests based on logic, malicious, political or something else
The federal liberal government has little to do with the pipeline issues, they took over one of the companies so they could use eminent domain to push things through. It's the provinces to the east and west, native rights and constitutional issues that are the problem, if Harper with his single minded focus on pipelines for 10 years could do nothing except head south, what could any government do? An independent Alberta would make this situation much worse for Alberta, Obama blocked the pipeline south then Trump allowed it and a democratic win in 2020 could see it shut down all together.

Then there would be the issue of federal native land claims in Alberta if succession were on the table and it would not end well for what would be left of the province. Western independence would be a very bad idea and joining America would not be an option, since they would not want a couple of extra, "liberal" states and besides, I don't know too many Canadians who would want to be Americans, even Albertan's. Would you wanna be in the middle of that hot mess with Trump? Jesus Christ I'm glad to be Canadian, winters and all!
 
Last edited:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
It's probably the only reason an outraged family has not killed you already, the rule of law operates inside the framework of the US constitution. Besides the 2nd amendment, is an amendment to the US constitution and you like that one. I don't think the 2nd will help much with gun regulation though, the government could legally ban everything except muzzle loaders. If they can regulate the caliber of weapons and machine guns, the they can do the same for semi automatics and magazine capacities as well.
Hmm, you seem pretty intent on making assumptions. People would still have the right to bear arms whether the government recognized the right or not. Rights don't come from government. Government was supposed to protect rights, but we see how that turned out don't we ?

The government COULD ban something, but I'm under no obligation to obey edicts which violate my rights. Prohibition doesn't work.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The government COULD ban something, but I'm under no obligation to obey edicts which violate my rights. Prohibition doesn't work.
Prohibition does not work for biological things like alcohol and plants like cannabis, they grow naturally. Guns are a different matter and they must be manufactured along with ammunition and those supply chains are highly vulnerable to disruption. As for not obeying the law, well mandatory sentences and property confiscation would work very well for guns, it was used for pot so there should be no legal or constitutional issues there. Shit a decade or two ago they could take your house for pot without a day in court and there were 5 year mandatory minimums. Many wives would squeal on their husband's gun stash to keep their house, and to get rid of a husband in some cases!
 

JayBio420

Well-Known Member
Jay..
Conservatives did win the popular vote, but unfortunately, like our neighbours and election to the south experienced..that's not the way our system is set up..Heck, even a coalition of minority parties can get together to run the show.
Yep, I understand our electoral system, which is why I corrected Fogdog. Good posts you’ve made, by the way MrT
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
Nova Scotia got hammered after confederation in 1867 to the benefit of Ontario and Ontario is in the same boat as the manufacturing centers in America now, in decline. Alberta's day in the sun my be short lived and an international (American) embargo on tar sands oil is very real possibility, in the not too distant future it might be treated like coal. Where I live we sit on vast supplies of coal and almost none of it is mined and very little is used locally either. The economic tides are changing constantly and ever year oil is becoming less important to the global economy, in a decade many cars will be electric. We have off shore oil on the Canadian east coast too and good future prospects for lot's more. Compared to the economic hammering the maritime's and Ontario have has taken in the past few decades Alberta has gotten away lightly.

The federal liberal government has little to do with the pipeline issues, they took over one of the companies so they could use eminent domain to push things through. It's the provinces to the east and west, native rights and constitutional issues that are the problem, if Harper with his single minded focus on pipelines for 10 years could do nothing except head south, what could any government do? An independent Alberta would make this situation much worse for Alberta, Obama blocked the pipeline south then Trump allowed it and a democratic win in 2020 could see it shut down all together.

Then there would be the issue of federal native land claims in Alberta if succession were on the table and it would not end well for what would be left of the province. Western independence would be a very bad idea and joining America would not be an option, since they would not want a couple of extra, "liberal" states and besides, I don't know too many Canadians who would want to be Americans, even Albertan's. Would you wanna be in the middle of that hot mess with Trump? Jesus Christ I'm glad to be Canadian, winters and all!
Nova Scotia got hammered after confederation in 1867 to the benefit of Ontario and Ontario is in the same boat as the manufacturing centers in America now, in decline. Alberta's day in the sun my be short lived and an international (American) embargo on tar sands oil is very real possibility, in the not too distant future it might be treated like coal. Where I live we sit on vast supplies of coal and almost none of it is mined and very little is used locally either. The economic tides are changing constantly and ever year oil is becoming less important to the global economy, in a decade many cars will be electric. We have off shore oil on the Canadian east coast too and good future prospects for lot's more. Compared to the economic hammering the maritime's and Ontario have has taken in the past few decades Alberta has gotten away lightly.

The federal liberal government has little to do with the pipeline issues, they took over one of the companies so they could use eminent domain to push things through. It's the provinces to the east and west, native rights and constitutional issues that are the problem, if Harper with his single minded focus on pipelines for 10 years could do nothing except head south, what could any government do? An independent Alberta would make this situation much worse for Alberta, Obama blocked the pipeline south then Trump allowed it and a democratic win in 2020 could see it shut down all together.

Then there would be the issue of federal native land claims in Alberta if succession were on the table and it would not end well for what would be left of the province. Western independence would be a very bad idea and joining America would not be an option, since they would not want a couple of extra, "liberal" states and besides, I don't know too many Canadians who would want to be Americans, even Albertan's. Would you wanna be in the middle of that hot mess with Trump? Jesus Christ I'm glad to be Canadian, winters and all!
DIY
Chuckle..I agree with you entirely or being happy at present of being a Canadian. :)

I would also whole heartedly agree that the stalled pipeline was not a result of the Liberals, but rather stalled efforts over the years by previous government and oil and gas executives alike..so here we now sit.


I think there are a few things to mention:

First, Western separation is unlikely and certainly the last choice of any citizen of this great country.
Second, I would be less inclined to call it Western separation as I would separation of the prairies..The fundamental divide between BC and Alberta seems less inclined to make them allies. If separation were ever to occur in my mind, it would be Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba...anyone proposing such measures knows full well the importance of International ports...Hudson Bay offering such an option.
Third..No question, inclusion of indigenous group and getting their input creates a more dynamic issue. Treaties etc. Personally, I dont see this as a problem as they want to thrive and provide for their members like anyone..Being part of the three province alliance would offer them far more that was is given from the Federal govt at present.
Four...and in my opinion more importantly from this conversation...I don't think people realize the dynamic...the pipeline is not the
primary issue, but merely the straw that seems to be breaking the camels back..Bad decisions about it were made in the past..no question...but when given the opportunity to defend its decision in courts upon appeal...The liberal government gave absolutely NO rebuttal...They didnt even present one...by purchasing the pipeline the government owed a defense to not only Canadian taxpayers who purchased it, but also Alberta energy companies who rely on it...Thats their obligation to defend interests! This just reminds me of Trump using media outlets to fill and kill compromising stories of himself with the string of ladies..The enquirer paid tons of money for exclusive stories then buried them..and gagged the individuals.

The primary issue is redistribution of wealth in the country..transfer payments! If the situation were more like regional disparity of industry thats one thing...ie fishing on the east coast...but what happening is that Energy is getting kicked in the teeth and Alberta is having to take on massive debt money is still being swapped directly from Alberta to Quebec annually to the tune of $11 Billion!!

Lastly, and this is what a lot of people out east dont realize...most indigenous groups with lands along the pipeline route actually are pro pipeline as this is a decent opportunity for its people to obtain high paying jobs..both in terms of construction and maintenance...That said, they are even salivating at the prospect to become owners in the project..Why wouldnt they be? Personally I think its excellent idea as everyone reaps the benefit and everyone has "skin in the game" with success or failure.

Toad
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Prohibition does not work for biological things like alcohol and plants like cannabis, they grow naturally. Guns are a different matter and they must be manufactured along with ammunition and those supply chains are highly vulnerable to disruption. As for not obeying the law, well mandatory sentences and property confiscation would work very well for guns, it was used for pot so there should be no legal or constitutional issues there. Shit a decade or two ago they could take your house for pot without a day in court and there were 5 year mandatory minimums. Many wives would squeal on their husband's gun stash to keep their house, and to get rid of a husband in some cases!
I'm sorry you support Reagan style prohibition.

1572646354883.png
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
The only prohibition the convicted pedophile wants to see is in the form of “no negroes allowed” signs
I think you should be able to paint your house any color you want, put up signs on your own property that has a message I disagree with and put your elbows on your own dinner table !

Hey!! Aren't you the guy advocating stripping people of their right to defend themselves and their own property, like the KKK did to unfortunate blacks when they tried to keep them from owning guns?

1572650363673.png
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I think you should be able to paint your house any color you want, put up signs on your own property that has a message I disagree with and put your elbows on your own dinner table !

Hey!! Aren't you the guy advocating stripping people of their right to defend themselves and their own property, like the KKK did to unfortunate blacks when they tried to keep them from owning guns?
Do you approve of a big poster sign of a women or yourself giving a blow to another whilst the other has a condom on. The message is safe sex always. ?
 

Rider101

Well-Known Member
No, the U.S. Constitution does not protect people. Guns do.
LOL Guns sure has done a great job protecting people in Afghanistan. And thank god for guns otherwise the Nazis who are best at making guns would not have won world war 2.

Guns kill and Conservatives Republicans and Nazis love them. The president of the NRA asked people to pry his guns from his dead hands lets do that grandfather in a ban on all guns, simple and effective unless you like watching Americans kill each other.
 

Rider101

Well-Known Member
Rider
I think we'd all agree...Canada's economy lives and dies with the direction of the US..in fact, as a natural resource supplier we are a
Leasing indicator as to which direction the US economy is going..NOT Liberal spending...business generates the life-blood and wealth for all Canadians..both the Liberal party and the NDP have made spending promises that you and I will have to pay for at some point through taxes...$30-$55 Billion respectively wasnt it?
Having one of Canada's largest oil and gas companies (Encana) pack up and leave...reduces the tax base used to pay for all the social programs..doesn't help either..
Here's a question..lets hypothetically say we just mothballed oil and gas all together in Canada..those international needs would be met elsewhere...and we had $20 billion a year
less in federal tax revenue..and thats just from Alberta..Where would we come up with that extra money to pay for health care and education?

Toad
If what your saying was true then we would have had lower unemployment under the liberals after oil went for boom to bust But the facts speak for themselves! When the cons were in power for ten years unemployment went up even with the oil boom even with the Americans economy taking off at that time.

OIL is dying it went from boom 150 a barrel to bust at 50 bucks a barrel if oil was the driving factor Canada would be doing worse then our American counterparts but like i said the facts speak for themselves while conservative believe in pipe dreams.

FYI the liberals spent five billion on pipe lines for poor Alberta money that could have been spent anywhere else in Canada. FYI there is more money being invested in Cannabis then in the oil and gas sector and it is expected to produce more jobs and revenue then oil and gas in Canada by 2021.

So what if thousands of people die each day from pollution created by the oil industries who cares that global warming threaten our very future YOU need more MONEY!!!

Canadian pot jobs, revenue have soared since legalization: StatsCan

 

Rider101

Well-Known Member
Jay..
Conservatives did win the popular vote, but unfortunately, like our neighbours and election to the south experienced..that's not the way our system is set up..Heck, even a coalition of minority parties can get together to run the show.
When you include how many people voted for the Block, NDP, and greens. Then you will understand that to pass a bill in parliment the liberals will have to have one of these parties vote with them. The liberals plus any other party equals a Moriarty of people that voted for those two parties. Like you said its the way our system works.
 

Rider101

Well-Known Member
Hmm, you seem pretty intent on making assumptions. People would still have the right to bear arms whether the government recognized the right or not. Rights don't come from government. Government was supposed to protect rights, but we see how that turned out don't we ?

The government COULD ban something, but I'm under no obligation to obey edicts which violate my rights. Prohibition doesn't work.
Funny prohibition against the Nazis worked!
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
If what your saying was true then we would have had lower unemployment under the liberals after oil went for boom to bust But the facts speak for themselves! When the cons were in power for ten years unemployment went up even with the oil boom even with the Americans economy taking off at that time.

OIL is dying it went from boom 150 a barrel to bust at 50 bucks a barrel if oil was the driving factor Canada would be doing worse then our American counterparts but like i said the facts speak for themselves while conservative believe in pipe dreams.

FYI the liberals spent five billion on pipe lines for poor Alberta money that could have been spent anywhere else in Canada. FYI there is more money being invested in Cannabis then in the oil and gas sector and it is expected to produce more jobs and revenue then oil and gas in Canada by 2021.

So what if thousands of people die each day from pollution created by the oil industries who cares that global warming threaten our very future YOU need more MONEY!!!

Canadian pot jobs, revenue have soared since legalization: StatsCan

Rider
You might not realize it, but you're making my point exactly...Canada - East vs West has divergent needs as economic drivers...hence inherent conflict..Think of the boom times for energy you're talking about...Do you know that happens to the Canadian dollar when crude oil is strong? (Im not trying to be a smartass) The Canadian dollar rises due to the increase in Canadas economic worth...and thus the export industry east suffers as a direct consequence..You cant compare the two provinces..There are
3.7 million people in Alberta , while 12+ million people in Ontario..A percentage flux in either market can be radically different..When Oil was high the US to Canadian exchange was pretty much at par..See how much more that means for Americans buying Canadian export
goods?
...and the Liberals spent $5 billion on a pipeline for Alberta? Really? Pretty biased comment don't you think? think the tax revenue generated through tolls paid for itself...not to mention, Is there a chance that much of the money the Liberals were spending is simply tax money being redirected back to where it was made in the first place. All Canadians benefit as a result...
The problem with some of these discussions is...that if people want a decent resolution...People have to be fair in what they say.....no question, there are 2 sides to every story but people need to put themselves in others shoes and acknowledge fair comment.
 
Top