Charlie Hebdo does it again

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
100% false. clerics and muslim organizations all over the world have condemned these attacks.
how racist is she for not hearing their deafening cries of indignation, and their insistence that the perpetrators face justice?

i assume she is SUPER RACIST since she is "parroting" me, "Verbatim" (she even used some of the same words!!!)

since schuylaar apparently agrees with me on this issue, she is now responsible for everything i ever said, and since there is some correlation between my stances on some issues and those of various "hate groups" (visible only through your own carefully crafted prism) she is now liable for every utterance of every klan dipshit who ever stopped mouthbreathing long enough to grunt out a syllable or two about whatever bullshit was grinding his gears at the moment.

and since you and schuylaar have agreed on many subjects in the past, that means YOU are now racist by association.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
kkkynes must have forgotten about that manifesto he wrote about multiculturalism and its inevitable cognate monoracialism. Something about some people having skulls that hold less buckshot and rap being the cause of crime. That is the only way to explain why he doesn't understand people calling him racist.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
There can never be an end in a war against an idea.
Unless you mean by "end" as in the total destruction of all Islam and any of its adherents, which is what I assume you meant, but you are certainly welcome to clarify that position if I am wrong.
So how about this new conspiracy theory? Tell us.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So how about this new conspiracy theory? Tell us.
the best idea for ending terrorism was summed up in one image.



it was published by arabic newspaper in qatar by the name of Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed.

but we are supposed to believe that muslims are just extremists and that moderate muslims are doing nothing in the way of condemnation.

right.
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Means nothing as there is no pope equivalent in the Islamic world.
But it would help if the big players like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt spoke out against it
Iran and Egypt and Saudi Arabia did speak out, saying that the murders were against the true code of Islam, BUT, antagonizing a people will not help understanding others values, and only lead to more violence. What a stupid fucking thing to say, didn't they (Muslims) read the Sunday comic strips when they were young, Popeye was always fucking with Mohammed. Don't you remember the one when Olive oyl was giving him head (Mohammed not Popeye)olive oyl.jpg and he was pissed because she spit it out.(now that was a funny cartoon) Oops, that was Screw magazine, not the Daily News. I'm sorry for the confusion.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Turkey is blocking Internet access to Charlie Hebdos latest release
It's unambiguously good that governments know how to block things that might incite bad feels. I can hardly wait until usa has such a system in place. Book burning was bad for the climate.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Iran and Egypt and Saudi Arabia did speak out, saying that the murders were against the true code of Islam, BUT, antagonizing a people will not help understanding others values, and only lead to more violence. What a stupid fucking thing to say, didn't they (Muslims) read the Sunday comic strips when they were young, Popeye was always fucking with Mohammed. Don't you remember the one when Olive oyl was giving him head (Mohammed not Popeye)View attachment 3331436 and he was pissed because she spit it out.(now that was a funny cartoon) Oops, that was Screw magazine, not the Daily News. I'm sorry for the confusion.
If Mohammed has never been drawn.
How do we know what he looks like.
So how can you say a drawing is offensive since the chance is great that the drawing is not one of Mohammed.
And major news organizations need to stop being pussies
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
If Mohammed has never been drawn.
How do we know what he looks like.
So how can you say a drawing is offensive since the chance is great that the drawing is not one of Mohammed.
And major news organizations need to stop being pussies
there have been a great number of drawings of mohammed BY moslems


http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/

the "no pictures of mohammed" taboo was manufactured by him, so he wouldnt be as easy to target for assassination, and ones he kicked the bucket, lotsa pictures were drawn.

but religions turn self-serving decrees into holy writ and iron-clad taboos almost automatically.

some sects even extend the picture drawing taboo to "all the creations of allah"
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
there have been a great number of drawings of mohammed BY moslems


http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/

the "no pictures of mohammed" taboo was manufactured by him, so he wouldnt be as easy to target for assassination, and ones he kicked the bucket, lotsa pictures were drawn.

but religions turn self-serving decrees into holy writ and iron-clad taboos almost automatically.

some sects even extend the picture drawing taboo to "all the creations of allah"
Ok, you have it right again, oh Grand Pooba. That really doesn't matter now, or it shouldn't, but surprise, surprise, it does alienate a shitload of very religious people. What to do?
 
Top