Charlie Hebdo does it again

Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
not drawing any equivalence, just pointing out how much other religions want to shut down free speech as well.

a point you willfully ignore.
Click to expand...
so the ACLU is a terrorist organization too.

they sue people for offensive speech all the time, and since lolsuits = machinegun attacks on cartoonists, bam.
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
so the ACLU is a terrorist organization too.

they sue people for offensive speech all the time, and since lolsuits = machinegun attacks on cartoonists, bam.
Click to expand...
So, the ACLU would be on your list as a terrorist organization. Good comparison. This is not a free world yet, we are too busy motherfucking the other guy. Some do it verbally, others do it with guns. I say freedom of speech, should hold responsibility when it assaults another's beliefs and way of life. Even in the USA, the bastion of free speech and liberty, acknowledges that. I can defame at will in this country, with only jail as a deterrent. Fucking with a Muslim, they play with a different set of rules. You want freedom of speech, go walk into a theater and yell fire, you will be arrested. Walk into a Catholic church, and say Christ sucks,they will say I'll pray for you. Walk into a mosque, and say the same thing about Mohamed, and it would be within their right according to their cult, and required, to chop your fucking head off.( die for Mohammed in jail) Walk into a synagogue, and they will probably beat you, and then sue. (lol) Walk into a bodega in the Bronx, and say Puerto Ricans are inbred criminals, and you will not make it out alive. (good chance). My point is, with the right to free speech come responsibility, and the sooner that is understood, the more the world can get along. I have no qualms about political attacks. But fucking with someone's religion, that takes it too far.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
Charlie Hebdo is publishing tomorrow another cartoon featuring Mohammed on it's cover.
The Egyptian state sponsored Islamic Authority has already denounced it as further insult to the world's 1.5 billion Muslims.
Free press gone wild ? How far is far enough? Should the right to say fuck you to the all the Muslim on the planet be accepted in 2015, KNOWING it will lead to further strife, and more attacks (bet on it) on targets of opportunity. What would the world say if Jews, blacks, or any other culture, were attacked on the front cover ( stereotypical racist cartoons). I feel now is the time to tone it down, and the editors ( what's left of them) sort of owe it to their country to take a break from purposely pissing of 20% of France's population. Come on guy's, now is not the fucking time to throw more fuel on the fire. Give your country a break. That is my opinion.
Click to expand...
Appease the Islamist is your opinion.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
When we know that almost a quarter of the worlds population is Muslim, where as any depiction of Mohammed is blasphemy, I say cut them a break and don't draw any images, DESIGNED to insult, We should be more sensitive to their beliefs. We really are saying fuck your religion, and fuck you. (only kidding) My God, those camel fuckers are sensitive, don't they get it, we are just having fun.
Click to expand...
Why? So they get more and more evil?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
Kinda like drawing a Swastika in Germany. How's that alright ( you will go to jail), but let's say, hanging Jesus from a cross upside down, about to be lowered into a cauldron of whores. Or a Jew, being lowered into a gas chamber. That is offensive, designed to inflame passions, usually with that mission. I say, just like the Germans do, outlaw derogatory cartoons. That publication was a fucking troll, demanding to be fucked with. I am sorry for the loss of life, but they wanted to push the boundaries of a violent religion. So they played games. time over time, and they got fucked in the end. So sorry
Click to expand...
But, any cartoons pointing to the evil of Zion is OK with you, I bet.

I swear before Allah you simply have no courage.
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
But, any cartoons pointing to the evil of Zion is OK with you, I bet.

I swear before Allah you simply have no courage.
Click to expand...
Yea, pretty much any cartoon fucking with Israel, gives me the giggles, your right there. Just like any cartoon fucking with racists that seem to focus on fucking with Muslims. Not enough of those, unfortunately. The cartoons showing what a dick Netenyahoo was in Paris that were published in Harretz this week actually were pretty funny, did you see them, you racist
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Appease the Islamist is your opinion.
Click to expand...
You really are a fucking bore. Has anyone ever told you that? Muslim this, Muslim that. Jesus Christ Almighty. Give it a break, or is that all you think about. Oh yea, your Jewish right? It figures then.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Muslim this, Muslim that? This is your thread to appease Jihad. Why did you start this, except to say, give Muslims a break because they are so sensitive?
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
So, the ACLU would be on your list as a terrorist organization. Good comparison. This is not a free world yet, we are too busy motherfucking the other guy. Some do it verbally, others do it with guns. I say freedom of speech, should hold responsibility when it assaults another's beliefs and way of life. Even in the USA, the bastion of free speech and liberty, acknowledges that. I can defame at will in this country, with only jail as a deterrent. Fucking with a Muslim, they play with a different set of rules. You want freedom of speech, go walk into a theater and yell fire, you will be arrested. Walk into a Catholic church, and say Christ sucks,they will say I'll pray for you. Walk into a mosque, and say the same thing about Mohamed, and it would be within their right according to their cult, and required, to chop your fucking head off.( die for Mohammed in jail) Walk into a synagogue, and they will probably beat you, and then sue. (lol) Walk into a bodega in the Bronx, and say Puerto Ricans are inbred criminals, and you will not make it out alive. (good chance). My point is, with the right to free speech come responsibility, and the sooner that is understood, the more the world can get along. I have no qualms about political attacks. But fucking with someone's religion, that takes it too far.
Click to expand...
ha ha ha ha ha ha

nice nervous breakdown

BUCKY is the one who argued that some failed lolsuits against a satire magazine are equivalent to the machinegun attack, therefore the ACLU (by bucky's criteria) IS a terrorist organization.

there is no way for anybody's words to "Assault" anybody, not even mohammedans.

you are NOT permitted to "defame" in this country, libel and slander are illegal. your plaintive wail about "jail being the only deterrent" is laughable. what penalties would you suggest for somebody who mortally wounds your Feels? should somebody who hurts your feelings be dragged into the town square for a horsewhipping? should they be burned at the stake?
be clear.

your wimpy sniveling whiney complaints about "responsibility" is pretty lulzy coming from a dirtbag who bitches about every ethnic group, from abyssinians to zoroastrians but you cant seem to explain why you havent had your noggin surgically removed by machete yet, despite your "provocations".

your position seems to be "behead those who insult anything... 'cept me"

that is what is referred to as Hypocrisy.

google it.
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Yes, you do care, because without people like me, all you spew would only be appreciated by the other assholes on this site, that on average have the intelligence of a dissected frog.
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
ha ha ha ha ha ha

nice nervous breakdown

BUCKY is the one who argued that some failed lolsuits against a satire magazine are equivalent to the machinegun attack, therefore the ACLU (by bucky's criteria) IS a terrorist organization.

there is no way for anybody's words to "Assault" anybody, not even mohammedans.

you are NOT permitted to "defame" in this country, libel and slander are illegal. your plaintive wail about "jail being the only deterrent" is laughable. what penalties would you suggest for somebody who mortally wounds your Feels? should somebody who hurts your feelings be dragged into the town square for a horsewhipping? should they be burned at the stake?
be clear.

your wimpy sniveling whiney complaints about "responsibility" is pretty lulzy coming from a dirtbag who bitches about every ethnic group, from abyssinians to zoroastrians but you cant seem to explain why you havent had your noggin surgically removed by machete yet, despite your "provocations".

your position seems to be "behead those who insult anything... 'cept me"

that is what is referred to as Hypocrisy.

google it.
Click to expand...
Luv you bro, really.
Be right back after my doobie break, because you, and that genius Doer (do what, annoy), are especially fun today ( must be the OG Blue)
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
It is hypocritical to ask me to define it

You say give Jihad a break
They are sinsitive

You don't say give Zion a break
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
so the ACLU is a terrorist organization too.

they sue people for offensive speech all the time, and since lolsuits = machinegun attacks on cartoonists, bam.
Click to expand...
you're the one making the false equivalence.

i was just rounding out your (as usual) one sided argument.

no doubt you hate the ACLU, probably just as much as you hate the SPLC.

like most white supremacists do, you have even wished death on morris dees.
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
It is hypocritical to ask me to define it

You say give Jihad a break
They are sinsitive

You don't say give Zion a break
Click to expand...
Nope, I really think Jihad is a simple, extremely violent response to Western exploitation, say for instance, the taking away a significant portion of the land called Palestine, by the powers that was at that moment, meaning GB,USA,FR, as a gift to all the European Jews that they all felt sad about letting them die in the first place.
Exploitation and abuse are wrong. That is why there is a Israel (thank Allah). What I don't like are people that make up their own rules, and say " What's wrong? Every one else did it". Why persecute me? Anti-Semitic thought? Why?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top