Climate in the 21st Century

Will Humankind see the 22nd Century?

  • Not a fucking chance

    Votes: 44 27.5%
  • Maybe. if we get our act together

    Votes: 42 26.3%
  • Yes, we will survive

    Votes: 74 46.3%

  • Total voters
    160

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
But wait, there's more!!



You cant resist picking cherries to give the wrong picture.
 

Three Berries

Well-Known Member

You cant resist picking cherries to give the wrong picture.
ChYna propaganda. You can have it.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Don't know them. Are they well educated environmental professionals?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
The only reason for this being a problem is that the 'right' has planted it's flag in the anti-science/fact world.

I didn't bother reading the link, so I might be off topic though.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
Yeah, they may not have the best environmental credentials...

Meet the Team
Board Members
Neil Record (Chairman) — Edward Atkin CBE — Lord Lawson — Martin Bralsford
Director: Dr Benny Peiser
Deputy Director: Andrew Montford
Head of Policy: Harry Wilkinson
Science Editor: Dr David Whitehouse
Energy Editor: Dr John Constable
Neil record - MSc in economics
Edward Atkin - businessman, investor and entrepreneur
Lord Lawson - degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economic
Martin Bralsford - MSc, FCA, FCT (economics)
Dr Benny Peiser - studied political science, English, and sports science at Frankfurt University, receiving a doctorate in cultural studies
Andrew Montford - graduated from the University of St Andrews with a degree in chemistry
Harry Wilkinson - University of York (2012 – 2015) ?
Dr David Whitehouse - Ph.D., Astrophysics, Victoria University of Manchester
Dr John Constable - B.A., English, Magdalene College, Cambridge. Ph.D., English, Cambridge University

Article author: Graham Lloyd, unknown education, writer for "The Australian", owned by News Corp, owned by the Murdoch's, founders of the trash mag New York Post.

And Graham also tried to rip off a business partner:

General mayhem:
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
The only reason for this being a problem is that the 'right' has planted it's flag in the anti-science/fact world.

I didn't bother reading the link, so I might be off topic though.
The other links to that site were of the same hard-right nature. It is frightening that such a cohesive body of bullshit can be found without trying. Our society is unwell.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
The other links to that site were of the same hard-right nature. It is frightening that such a cohesive body of bullshit can be found without trying. Our society is unwell.
As crazy as it might seem it is still far better than it was in any other time.

It is just white people are finally waking up to how it is impacting them.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Oh I hope you are right.
One example, in 1972 was when colleges had to start letting women and minorities full access, so basically anyone with a PhD prior to 1980 was a white male. That would mean that anyone gaining a college education in the 90's was getting it almost exclusively from white men, which is what today's far right dick heads really want us to go back to.

But it is not going to happen. These idiots have just found a new toy to spread their brainwashing propaganda, and are acting like the spoiled rotten brats they were back when they were throwing fits in the toy isles as kids with our democracy using it.

They were smart and won a huge victory using Obama to scare up enough white angst in 2010 to gerrymander their power for the next decade, and ultimately giving us Trump in 2016, which they have now used to gerrymander as much as they could for the next decade.

Which sucks. Especially when coupled with the stuffing of their right wing activist judges. But the 70 year scam that the white men in the Republican party has been exposed, and they lost in 2018, and again in 2020. With the power of the presidency, and house and senate in 2018. It is going to be hard for the red states to regain their local democracies before 2030, but I don't see the Democratic party dropping the ball on the next census like they did the last one.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
One example, in 1972 was when colleges had to start letting women and minorities full access, so basically anyone with a PhD prior to 1980 was a white male. That would mean that anyone gaining a college education in the 90's was getting it almost exclusively from white men, which is what today's far right dick heads really want us to go back to.

But it is not going to happen. These idiots have just found a new toy to spread their brainwashing propaganda, and are acting like the spoiled rotten brats they were back when they were throwing fits in the toy isles as kids with our democracy using it.

They were smart and won a huge victory using Obama to scare up enough white angst in 2010 to gerrymander their power for the next decade, and ultimately giving us Trump in 2016, which they have now used to gerrymander as much as they could for the next decade.

Which sucks. Especially when coupled with the stuffing of their right wing activist judges. But the 70 year scam that the white men in the Republican party has been exposed, and they lost in 2018, and again in 2020. With the power of the presidency, and house and senate in 2018. It is going to be hard for the red states to regain their local democracies before 2030, but I don't see the Democratic party dropping the ball on the next census like they did the last one.
The last sentence makes me curious. How did they drop the ball?
 
Top