Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances

N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
redi jedi said:
No doubt...and the odds of a new group of people banding together is pretty slim now too.
Click to expand...
Please be advised that a Coalition-in-exile does in fact exist and consists of hard working, honest, reliable and loyal dis-affected Coalition Steering Committee members and former Coalition volunteers and supporters who have successfully worked together to prepare an application for an audit into the Coalition's questionable financial management practices and wrongful corporate conduct and who are now gathering information and evidence in support of an action against Wilcox and his Coalition under section 467.111 of the CCC.
 
G

gb123

Well-Known Member
you have something there..for sure!! ;)

The truth shines through better than lies do.....and easily told.
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
I'd say it's looking like this needed to be done. I don't trust Wilcox and am sitting on a the fence on Conroy as well.
If Conroy did anything against us with our money, he deserves to be nailed. I know he all ready screwed half of the patients he was supposed to be helping. So I'm close to forming my opinion of him. But will wait to see more on this.
Thank Nadine for all your efforts and concern.
 
Sandy420

Sandy420

Well-Known Member

Nadine E. Bews
Public Accountant & Forensic Auditor
“Semper Fidelis” Legal Chronologist & Historiographer
Email: lawtalk@live.ca
Phone 403-248-1188
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

December 14, 2015
MMAR PPl/DPL Coalition Against Repeal
aka Cannabis Rights Coalition
c/o Jason Wilcox, President/CEO
1252 Burrard Street, Unit 202
Vancouver, BC V6Z IZI
Via email: Jason Wilcox coalitionagainstrepeal@gmail.com
John Conroy jconroy@johnconroy.com
Kirk Tousaw info@tousawllaw.com

DEMAND FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Dear Mr.Wicox;

RE: MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal aka Cannabis Rights Coalition
I am acknowledging receipt of the following financial information:
  • * Trust Account bank statements: November 12, 2013 – December 31, 2014; and
  • * TD Canada Trust bank statements: May 1, 2014 – June 30, 2014; and
  • * Pay Pal account: December 26, 2013 - December 16,2014; and
  • * Excel spreadsheet with 3 entries: name, address and contribution amount; and
  • * Excel spreadsheet with 1 entry: initial deposit in the amount of $3,000 made Feb. 13, 2015 to open bank TD bank account.
Please be advised that this information has been found to be overly inadequate and therefore a demand is now being made for full financial disclosure by way of auditedfinancial statements including; balance sheet, statement of income and expense and notes to financial statements from the founding of the Coalition on January 15, 2013 to November 30, 2015 verifying compliance with GAAPP and identifying areas of financial concern.
Furthermore, a demand is being made for a copy of the Cannabis Rights Coalition incorporating documents and a copy of the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal


Please see above link for rest of document.
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
In my mind anyone who contributed funds to the coalition is entitled to know Who, Why and for what they were used.
I will be following with interest.
Making it public here is a good idea imo as it keeps things from going on behind the scene.
Mr Wilcox must be quite pissed off...and Mr Conroy just....

Like our good Judge Phellan seems to be doing so suspiciously.
Wouldn't ya love to hear the back room chatter.
 
CalyxCrusher

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
Anyone would be a fool to assume Judge Phelan is not aware of the increasing crackdowns on dispensaries, and threats of sending in the RCMP. He can LITERALLY give his judgement whenever he wants, yet NOTHING. Something HAS to be up. Otherwise he would save suffering patients the stress and heartache of having their access to cannabis choked off gradually whether it be through a dispensary or growing your own. It really does appear to be self serving towards LP's and their non compassionate agendas.


LP's are basically the one guy you knew back in the day that always said he had the best meds, blah blah, while being completely oblivious to the shit quality provided, but you can't do anything because he's your only option. It's fucking sad how transparent all of this is. Fucking disgusting
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
CalyxCrusher said:
Anyone would be a fool to assume Judge Phelan is not aware of the increasing crackdowns on dispensaries, and threats of sending in the RCMP. He can LITERALLY give his judgement whenever he wants, yet NOTHING. Something HAS to be up. Otherwise he would save suffering patients the stress and heartache of having their access to cannabis choked off gradually whether it be through a dispensary or growing your own. It really does appear to be self serving towards LP's and their non compassionate agendas.


LP's are basically the one guy you knew back in the day that always said he had the best meds, blah blah, while being completely oblivious to the shit quality provided, but you can't do anything because he's your only option. It's fucking sad how transparent all of this is. Fucking disgusting
Click to expand...
It's what I've been screaming on since day 1
I'm almost sure we have a paid off judge here. Seems about like between wilcox and conroy and this delayed judge they've been planning the rape from the beginning.
It's all driven by greed and there's thousand of sheep waiting to be their patsies.
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
I wonder what crock of shit he'll have ready if he goes against us. There is only one fair and honest answer here. Let folks grow their own cheaply. Simple as that...no other way to see it. It's the cheapest way, therefore the correct way.
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
@Nadine Bews

Most of your arguement has to due with this date July 1, 2015 , im not a law expert but ive dipped my toes into small claims, torts and government mediations nothing too intense but takes many many hours of research. Do you feel its a possibility that before that date terms and accounts have already been set up? Would Conroy be expected to close the account of origin and transfer to a trust? What if it was spent? Plausible deniability of accuracy on funds before this date?

just being my unbiased self; I would however love to here about

Slander and intimidation
Theft of property and funds
Money laundering
Kidnapping
Extortion

To me thats the juicy stuff :)
 
N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
Has Conroys time frame to reply expired?
Click to expand...
Please be advised that the Conroy-Wilcox joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship operating as the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal was served Notice of Demand for Audit on December 10, 2015.

Wilcox responded the next day by delivering the 2014 trust account statements and the 2014 PayPal account but failed to provide bank statement for the TD Canada Trust account which is the account that Wilcox uses for his personal expenses. Wilcox failed to send any information for 2015 nor did he provide any information with respect to his many fund raising events or the proceeds from the sale of merchandise or the proceeds from lotteries or from the 82 lock boxes that were strategically distributed across Canada.

I have analysed and reconciled the 2014 information and the results are as follows:

Trust Account: Total collected, November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2014 $ 98,689.33
Total paid to Conroy November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2014 $ 85,000.00
Trust Account Balance, November 30, 2014 $ 13,606.84

PayPal Account: Total collected November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2014 $ 31,900.00
Amount Transferred to Trust Account $ 31,900.00
Pay Pal Account Balance, November 30, 2014 $ 512.79

I have advised Conroy and Wilcox that the above is overly inadequate and have demanded a complete sset of audited financial statements including but not limited to: balance sheet, statement of income and expense and notes to the financial statements and an Auditor's Report verifying that the generally accepted principles and procedure governing accounting and business conduct have been fully complied with. If we do not receive this information in a timely manner and they continue to ignore our demands, we shall have to file the original application in provincial court and have a judge 'order an audit of Coalition finances'.
 
Last edited:
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Nadine Bews said:
Please be advised that the Conroy-Wilcox joint-personal representative solicitor-client relationship operating as the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition against Repeal was served Notice of Demand for Audit on December 10, 2015.

Wilcox responded the next day by delivering the 2014 trust account statements and the 2014 PayPal account but failed to provide bank statement for the TD Canada Trust account which is the account that Wilcox uses for his personal expenses. Wilcox failed to send any information for 2015 nor did he provide any information with respect to his many fund raising events or the proceeds from the sale of merchandise or the proceeds from lotteries or from the 82 lock boxes that were strategically distributed across Canada.

I have analysed and reconciled the 2014 information and the results are as follows:

Trust Account: Total collected, November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2014 $ 98,689.33
Total paid to Conroy November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2014 $ 85,000.00
Trust Account Balance, November 30, 2014 $ 13,606.84

PayPal Account: Total collected November 1, 2013 - November 30, 2014 $ 31,900.00
Amount Transferred to Trust Account $ 31,900.00
Pay Pal Account Balance, November 30, 2014 $ 512.79

I have advised Conroy and Wilcox that the above is overly inadequate and have demanded a complete sset of audited financial statements including but not limited to: balance sheet, statement of income and expense and notes to the financial statements and an Auditor's Report verifying that the generally accepted principles and procedure governing accounting and business conduct have been fully complied with. If we do not receive this information in a timely manner and they continue to ignore our demands, we shall have to file the original application in provincial court and have a judge 'order an audit of Coalition finances'.
Click to expand...
So as of right now they are acting in good faith..kind of? Should have filed the application in the beginning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top