coating closet with aluminum foil?

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
In science classes, they have this little experiment. Testing the reflectivity of various materials. Aluminum foil is used as the benchmark(arbitrarily 100% reflectance).

Everything else in the experiment falls short of it. White paint included. White paint is highly diffuse, a completely diffuse(Lambertian) surface will reflect 1 steradian of light over 2*pi steradians. That's over 6 times less intense light than a highly specular(metallic) surface will reflect the same amount of light. White paint spreads light, and does this excellently. metallic surfaces reflect intense light, and do this excellently. For CFLs the light is already highly diffuse. Reflection off white paint(especially as distance increases) sucks compared to aluminum(even foil).

In reality, bare aluminum reflects 97% of solar radiance, and 90% of photosynthetically active radiation(PAR). A thin aluminum oxide coating immediately forms on bare aluminum. This coating permanently protects the aluminum from further oxidation(unless removed by solvents). Aluminum oxide is stronger than steel, and is also white in color.

Reflective Mylar® is PET fiber with aluminum vacuum deposited onto it. It is half as diffuse as Al foil(around 50% and 25%), and offers even more intense reflectivity. However, only thick Reflective Mylar® is this effective. Thinner Mylars allow light to go through them. Reflective Mylar is also flammable(and releases toxic fumes when burned), aluminum foil does not do either of these.

The side of the foil does not change the reflectance(sum of all reflectivity for all angles of incidence), but does change the amount of specular reflectivity. The shiny side will give you more intense reflection, the dull side is more diffuse, though the difference between them is nearly negligible.
 

MyGTO2007

Well-Known Member
In science classes, they have this little experiment. Testing the reflectivity of various materials. Aluminum foil is used as the benchmark(arbitrarily 100% reflectance).

Everything else in the experiment falls short of it. White paint included. White paint is highly diffuse, a completely diffuse(Lambertian) surface will reflect 1 steradian of light over 2*pi steradians. That's over 6 times less intense light than a highly specular(metallic) surface will reflect the same amount of light. White paint spreads light, and does this excellently. metallic surfaces reflect intense light, and do this excellently. For CFLs the light is already highly diffuse. Reflection off white paint(especially as distance increases) sucks compared to aluminum(even foil).

In reality, bare aluminum reflects 97% of solar radiance, and 90% of photosynthetically active radiation(PAR). A thin aluminum oxide coating immediately forms on bare aluminum. This coating permanently protects the aluminum from further oxidation(unless removed by solvents). Aluminum oxide is stronger than steel, and is also white in color.

Reflective Mylar® is PET fiber with aluminum vacuum deposited onto it. It is half as diffuse as Al foil(around 50% and 25%), and offers even more intense reflectivity. However, only thick Reflective Mylar® is this effective. Thinner Mylars allow light to go through them. Reflective Mylar is also flammable(and releases toxic fumes when burned), aluminum foil does not do either of these.

The side of the foil does not change the reflectance(sum of all reflectivity for all angles of incidence), but does change the amount of specular reflectivity. The shiny side will give you more intense reflection, the dull side is more diffuse, though the difference between them is nearly negligible.
holy shit thats a mouth full
 

LUDACRIS

New Member
Choosing the right surface for the walls of your grow room is very important, as up to 40% of your total yield comes from the edge, and the right wall surface can increase the amount of light those plants receive by up to 30%! Artificial lighting diminishes exponentially with distance, so it is important to ‘contain’ as much of this light as possible, and direct it accordingly. Reflective surfaces also help illuminate the lower portions of the garden, providing lower buds with light and heat energy.
To get the best results with your light and walls, it is important to get the walls as close as possible to your garden to ensure the least amount of light is wasted. As a caveat, the percentages provided are only useful as a general guideline, as they present the range of reflectivity of the particular surfaces. The high percentage presents the best possible circumstances for that material (for example a 99% reflectivity rating for mylar sheeting would be under ideal conditions - no creases, completely flat, no discoloration, etc).
The best way to determine how well your grow room walls reflect light would be to purchase a light meter and measure your light directly; then take an opaque board and hold it a few inches off one of your walls with the light meter below the board in such a fashion that the light reflects off the wall and onto the light meter. You can then compare the difference between the two and determine a percentage from those numbers, the closer the two numbers are, the better your wall reflects light. It is important that in both measurements, your light meter is the same distance from the light, otherwise your results will be skewed.Also important to note is that radiant light energy refers to electromagnetic (EM) radiation with a wavelength between 400-700 nanometers (nm) and radiant heat energy correlates to EM radiation with a wavelength between 800-2000nm.

Listed below are some of the most commonly used materials used for grow room walls:
Foylon:
A more durable version of mylar, made of spun polyester fabric and reinforced with foil laminate. Foylon is resistant to most solutions, won't tear or fade, and can be wiped or washed clean.
A great solution for growers who are interested in long term use, and though it may be slightly more expensive than mylar, its durability will more than make up for its cost. It has the ability to reflect about 95% of the light and approximately 85% of the heat energy, so a good ventilation system should be used in conjunction with folyon.
A recommended method to attach Foylon to the walls would be using Velcro, as it makes taking it down for cleaning much easier nd reduces the risk of tearing, creasing or bending it. If this is used for your walls, making sure you get it flush with the wall with no pockets of air between it and the wall to prevent hotspots.
Mylar:
A highly reflective polyester film that comes in varying thickness, the most common being 1 and 2 mm thick. The 2mm thick mylar while not quite as durable as the foylon, is fairly rugged. The 1mm thick mylar tears fairly easily, so taking it down for cleaning is quite difficult without damaging it in the process. Both types of mylar are able to reflect approximately 92-97% reflective, giving it the potential to be more reflective than foylon, but because foylon is more easily cleaned without damaging it as well as it being harder to crease, foylon usually ends up being slightly more reflective. Important to note is that mylar reflects radiant heat energy just as well as foylon (around 85%), so proper ventilation is necessary if mylar is used in your grow room. Attaching this to walls can be done in a similar fashion as foylon, and the same caution should be used to avoid creating hotspots in your room. The 1mm thick mylar stands a fair chance of being creased or ripped in the process unfortunately, even if Velcro is used to attach to the walls.
C3 anti-detection film:
A specialized type of mylar that exhibits the same properties as the 2mm thick mylar, but in addition to reflecting approximately 92-97% of the light, it also is 90% infrared proof, making your grow room all but invisible to IR scanning. This can also be attached in the same manner as foylon or mylar, and the same caution should be used to avoid creating hotspots in your room.
Flat white paint:
Self explanatory; a great option for large grow rooms or for people who are interested in a low maintenance wall. Flat white paint has the ability to reflect between 75-85% of the light, and does not create hotspots. Adding a fungicide is recommended when painting.Glossy and eggshell whites not reflect light as efficiently as flat white. Semi-gloss paint for example, only has the ability to reflect between 55-60% of the light. Also important to remember when using paint is that any smears or blemishes on the surface take away from how reflective the wall is so care should be taken to avoid marking or staining the walls. Titanium white paint is very reflective; however it is usually only used on reflectors due to its high cost.
Elastomere paint (info by furun)
A rubberized roofing paint with 90% reflection. Good for growboxes. Mildew resistant. Highly reflective.
Kool Seal White Elastomeric Roof Coating ~ $15.00 (1 Gallon)
Ultra high reflectivity
Forms a rubber-like blanket that expands and contracts
Adheres to almost any surface (very good on wood and metal)
Available @ www.lowes.com
White/Black plastic (also known as panda plastic or "poly"):
"Poly" is useful if you are setting up a temporary grow room or don’t want to damage the walls. Poly is easily cleaned.
The purpose of the black side is to not allow any light to pass through the plastic, which ensures your dark cycle remains dark. The white side is 75-90% reflective. Choose a 6 "mill" thickness of poly for maximum light blockage and duribility.If this plastic is put too close to the light, you will obviously melt it so be careful!. Panda plastic does not create hotspots. Poly can be attached to the walls by using carpenter’s nails or using tape glue or similar means. This can be used as a cheap alternative to mylar if painting your grow room is out of the question.
Polystyrene Foam Sheeting (more commonly known as Styrofoam):
This is excellent for harsh environment growrooms (your attic for example), provided you have a good ventilation system and a way to keep the temperatures from rising too high (an a/c unit or similar) as it is an excellent insulator.
It is also a great material for use in a temporary setup or for use as a "travelling reflector" on a light mover, where weight is a concern. It is approximately 75-85% light reflective so it is comparable to using a flat white paint. Foam will not create hot spots. Rigid foam can be purchased in sheets, and can be used as a free standing wall or can be taped, glued or nailed to the wall, the last generally being the most successful method.
Emergency Blankets:
These are ultra thin polyester blankets that are sold in most camping stores and are constructed of a single layer of polyester film that is covered with a layer of vapor deposited aluminum.
It is not very effective at reflecting light because it is so thin. Holding it between you and a light source, many small holes are noticed at the intersections of creases and the entire blanket is translucent to begin with, this coupled with the many creases that are in it when you purchase it takes away a significant amount of it reflectivity. It is very easily creased as well which also detracts from its ability to reflect light.And while it is reflects nearly 90% of radiant heat energy, it is only able to reflect around 70% of the light.
The largest advantage of using this type of material is that it is very cheap and therefore easily replaced. Emergency blankets can create hotspots if not attached flush to the wall so it is important that no air gaps exist between it and your supporting wall. The easiest way to attach this is to use tape (Aluminum or metal tape is recommended), as it tears very easily once it is cut or punctured.
Aluminum Foil:
Aluminum foil is no more than 55% reflective - if used, make sure that the dull side is the one that is used to reflect the light. When it becomes creased its reflectivity is even lower (around 35%.) It is also very dangerous to use because it creates hotspots easily, is electrically conductive, and is a fire hazard when it is in close contact with HID lighting. Attaching this to walls is a pain and usually using aluminum tape or glue is the best way. This should only be used as a last resort, and even then its usefulness is questionable.

THATS A MOUTHFULL.
LUDACRIS.
;-)
 

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
https://www.rollitup.org/indoor-growing/8168-test.html

Arbitrarily assigning Mylar as 100%(it's not):

425/500 = .85 or 85% reflectivity for aluminum foil compared to Reflective Mylar(I already told you Ref. Mylar reflects more intensely). It also demonstrates no measurable difference between what side of the foil is used.

So much for that 55% bollocks(in this one test it's 155% of what that claims, that's quite significant). I'm not saying fdd2blk's experiment is perfect.. or authoritative...(neither does he, afaik). Take it as you will.

Perhaps you should verify facts before copy/pasting.... There are too many errors in that block of bollocks to address here.
 

M Blaze

Well-Known Member
For CFL lights foil will be ok but its not a good option if you upgrade your lighting to something more powerfull.
 

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
For CFL lights foil will be ok but its not a good option if you upgrade your lighting to something more powerfull.
And what is? Reflective Mylar? Foylon? Reflective Mylar reflects light more intensely(also radiant heat, as it's also light aka radiance) than foil.

Foylon is laminated aluminum foil for fucks sake.

This hypocritical bullshit is getting old.... :cuss:

Any reflective product based on aluminum is superior at reflecting radiant heat than it is PAR(visible light).

:peace:
 

LUDACRIS

New Member
https://www.rollitup.org/indoor-growing/8168-test.html

arbitrarily assigning mylar as 100%(it's not):

425/500 = .85 or 85% reflectivity for aluminum foil compared to reflective mylar(i already told you ref. Mylar reflects more intensely). It also demonstrates no measurable difference between what side of the foil is used.

So much for that 55% bollocks(in this one test it's 155% of what that claims, that's quite significant). I'm not saying fdd2blk's experiment is perfect.. Or authoritative...(neither does he, afaik). Take it as you will.

Perhaps you should verify facts before copy/pasting.... There are too many errors in that block of bollocks to address here.

who are you talking to ????????????
 

LUDACRIS

New Member
And what is? Reflective Mylar? Foylon? Reflective Mylar reflects light more intensely(also radiant heat, as it's also light aka radiance) than foil.

Foylon is laminated aluminum foil for fucks sake.

This hypocritical bullshit is getting old.... :cuss:

Any reflective product based on aluminum is superior at reflecting radiant heat than it is PAR(visible light).

:peace:




:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:.
SOMEBODY IS PISSED.
(LOVE IT).
;-)
 

M Blaze

Well-Known Member
And what is? Reflective Mylar? Foylon? Reflective Mylar reflects light more intensely(also radiant heat, as it's also light aka radiance) than foil.

Foylon is laminated aluminum foil for fucks sake.

This hypocritical bullshit is getting old.... :cuss:

Any reflective product based on aluminum is superior at reflecting radiant heat than it is PAR(visible light).

:peace:
Relax mate, I wasnt having a go at you. I was just answering his question by saying that foil is ok for CFL lighting but anything more and its not a good option.

Is that wrong in your opinion?
 

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
I don't know if I'd call it pissed.

Astonished by the logical fallacies and lack of research(it's not hard to find) people are willing to discover surrounding reflective materials... definitely.
 

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
Relax mate, I wasnt having a go at you. I was just answering his question by saying that foil is ok for CFL lighting but anything more and its not a good option.

Is that wrong in your opinion?
It's not really opinion. It's demonstrable, it's reproducible. This makes it a science.

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01407.htm said:
Further, this means that the radiation will act like light and the foil shall act as a mirror.
http://www.aluminumfoils.com/converting-materials/coating-aluminum-foil.html said:
Since aluminum foil has a high reflectivity value (95 percent)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_foil said:
The reflectivity of bright aluminium foil is 88% while dull embossed foil is about 80%
http://sharepoint.leon.k12.fl.us/science/Probeware%20Lessons/L-reflectiity%20of%20light.pdf said:
The aluminum foil will arbitrarily be assigned a reflectivity of 100 percent.
http://www.vernierkorea.com/exper/sample/phy_01/3_02.pdf said:
The aluminum foil will arbitrarily be assigned a reflectivity of 100 percent.
http://www.mbtechnology.com/product_line/pdf/metalflex%20data%20sheet-Revised%205-15-08.pdf said:
The aluminum surface offers exceptional reflectivity (Initial 89%. ASTM C-1549)
http://www.nitronindustries.com/Technical_aluminum.htm said:
Aluminum foil, with its reflective surface, can block the flow of radiation. Most Aluminum insulation has only a 5% absorption and emissivity ratio. They are impervious to water vapor and convection currents and reflect away 95% of all radiant energy that strikes its air bound surfaces.
http://www.coler.com/pdf/Low_E_Wet_Dry_Cycle_Emittance-1.pdf said:
Aluminum foil generally has a reflectance in the range 0.95 to .097(95% to 97%). the corresponding emiitance values are 0.05 to 0.03. The sum of the reflectance and the emittance of a material is one.
http://www.sofia.usra.edu/Edu/materials/activeAstronomy/section4.pdf said:
Students learn that infrared light is reflected in the same manner as visible light.
Here's a fairly good discussion on the subject: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00561.htm

Google it if that's not enough. :lol:
 

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
Here's a chart I composited, It compares Al(aluminum), Au(gold), Ag(silver), Reflective Mylar®(red-dotted line), and ESR(Enhanced Specular Reflector Film blue-dotted line). 400-700 nm is PAR, the rest of the chart isn't as significant. But it is important to note, apparently, aluminum is aluminum. As Reflective Mylar® conforms to the curve of an aluminum mirror.



The only possible spectra Mylar/Foylon, whatever(aluminum based reflectors) would exceed 92% is in IR, which is heat. So when you see Reflective Mylar® being claimed to reflect 97-98%... it's IR heat, not plant-usable light.

References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflectivity
https://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~kauer/public/calor08/pics/mylar_esr_reflectivity.png
http://www.madehow.com/Volume-1/Aluminum-Foil.html
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01407.htm
http://products3.3m.com/catalog/us/en001/electronics_mfg/vikuiti/node_7358GD8CMRbe/root_GST1T4S9TCgv/vroot_S6Q2FD9X0Jge/gvel_B6D4SWL5QCgl/theme_us_vikuiti_3_0/command_AbcPageHandler/output_html

(I showed you mine, now show me yours?) :lol:
 

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
This has been going on for a loooong time.

It's ridiculous as it is hilarious. :lol:

I don't mind giving folks a reality check.

Aluminum foil dance time!

(yes, that's Al foil, and even from across the room it has intense specular reflection)
 
Top