4way hit of window pane, my first LSD. Went to a led zepplin concert, Very nice clean high unlike that blotter shit.No you are an old fucker! Anyway, I did LSD a bunch of times before I smoked pot.
.................thanks for the mathThis is what happens if we strip anything outside of the 400-700nm range.
View attachment 3405137
How did you do that? Teach me sensiThis is what happens if we strip anything outside of the 400-700nm range.
View attachment 3405137
Very little, but like blue, some is good. A small amount of 730nm is also good. The 3000k 80cri SPD has something like a 6:1 R:FR ratio. HPS has more like 2:1. That lower R:FR ratio of HPS could have something to do with why it makes such a good flowering lamp, as well as the high rate of photons.Wondering the same thing. Would anything above 700nm actually be able to contribute to photosynthesis though?
View attachment 3405540
View attachment 3405541
Whichever one helps us grow better should be taken into consideration.Very little, but like blue, some is good. A small amount of 730nm is also good. The 3000k 80cri SPD has something like a 6:1 R:FR ratio. HPS has more like 2:1. That lower R:FR ratio of HPS could have something to do with why it makes such a good flowering lamp, as well as the high rate of photons.
Too bad it would be hard to have 2 values for everything if we want to represent both 380-750 and 400-700 individually. We'd either have to name them 2 things (like PAR[380-750] and PAR[400-700], or compromise and just decide on one, knowing we lose valuable information with one, and mislead with the other.
Up to about 720nm, is still ~25% RQE...so it's not useless. I think the 3000K cobs benefit more photosynthetically from what they have beyond 700nm than hps spectrum does.Wondering the same thing. Would anything above 700nm actually be able to contribute to photosynthesis though?
View attachment 3405540
View attachment 3405541
Hard to say. I can't find anything useful about Gavita (their website AND spec sheets are seriously PITA).My question is what is gavita using when claiming 2.07µmols/j?
And what is the correct one to use. 380-780 is more the real par range.
RQE is what is scientifically used not just the term PAR. RQE was established by McCree who is credited with defining PAR and shows activity beyond/below 400-700. 720nm being 25%...to some people that is how well green is used.Hard to say. I can't find anything useful about Gavita (their website AND spec sheets are seriously PITA).
Regarding the range -- I don't know. But PAR range is often referred to as being 400-700 nm.
Oh please do![...]
I'm not arguing or questioning anything you've done. I would like to thank you fornit all and your new thread. Just voicing my opinion/understanding of what PAR really is, openly for discussion.
It's cheaper at higher current, but less efficient. That means you'd need fewer of them to fulfill your lighting requirement.Could someone add in an explanation to what these numbers mean?
It looks like lumens per watt is higher at lower volts, but per PAR is cheaper at higher volts?
Do LEDS operate more efficiently at lower or higher voltages?