A former police officer in Tennessee says he was fired for reporting his chief's suspected KKK ties to Black Lives Matter organizers.
Robert Black has filed a lawsuit alleging that Millersville Police Chief Mark Palmer and other department leaders subjected him to a culture of racist harassment and intimidation — including a female officer grabbing his genitals and, when he told her to leave him alone, asking "Why? Because I'm not a n*gger?"
Black, who is white, alleges he was targeted because he has a biracial son, with Palmer once telling another officer, "Robert is a little different. He's not one of us." Black is suing along with Joshua Barnes, a Black former officer who alleges that Palmer referred to African Americans as "n-----s," "monkeys," and "animals," and accused him of "always want[ing] to get some fried chicken and watermelon."
"Through it all, management allegedly silenced officers' complaints by instructing them to support the 'thin blue line,'" the Daily Beastreported Friday. "So Black made a fake Facebook profile, reached out to Black Lives Matter organizers, and blew the whistle on his department. Days later, he was fired. At least two other officers who allegedly clashed with management departed soon thereafter."
The police chief was previously sued in 2015 by two men who had been his first Black officers, but the case was ultimately dismissed.
"One of the former officers, Anthony Hayes, claimed Palmer took him on an unexplained visit to a former KKK leader's home, where Hayes 'was subjected to an extended conversation in the presence of KKK memorabilia,'" the Daily Beast reports. "Hayes also accused Palmer of placing a copy of a KKK magazine in Hayes' locker, with a sticky note that read 'this was left for you—don't let your subscription run out.'"
In addition to chief Palmer, Black and Barnes' lawsuit names as defendants the city of Millersville and assistant chief Dustin Carr — who is under investigation for allegedly assaulting his wife after she accused him of having an affair with a woman arrested on drug charges.
Black says after Palmer began harassing him over his biracial son, he read up on the previous lawsuit against the chief — and learned of his suspected KKK ties. That's when he set up a pseudonymous Facebook page and began seeking out Nashville-area Black Lives Matter activists, which led to his termination.
"I tried to do my job. I tried to learn, I tried to do the right thing," Black told the Daily Beast. "It seems like if you're a good guy in this type of work and you're willing to do the right thing—it's almost like if you don't toe the line, you're going to be dealt with, one way or another. And if you do toe the line, you're going to be living with the moral conflict of doing things you may not agree with."
Watch a report on the lawsuit from Nashville's Channel 5 below.
https://mappingprejudice.umn.edu
And as soon as they lined them up, they ran freeways right through their neighborhoods.
WATERLOO, Iowa (AP) — The first Black police chief in Waterloo, Iowa, is facing intense opposition from some current and former officers as he works with city leaders to reform the department, including the removal of its longtime insignia that resembles a Ku Klux Klan dragon.
Joel Fitzgerald says his 16-month tenure in Waterloo, a city of 67,000 with a history of racial divisions, is a “case study” for what Black police chiefs face as they seek to build community trust and hold officers to higher standards. In an interview with The Associated Press, he said the attacks were driven by misinformation and racism toward him and his boss, the city’s first Black mayor.
“I don’t think there’s been any police chief in America in a small- or medium-sized department that have endured this for the reasons I have endured it and I think the reasons have to do with race,” said Fitzgerald, who previously served as the chief of larger departments in Fort Worth, Texas and Allentown, Pennsylvania. “This is my fourth job being the first Black police chief. I’ve dealt with pushback in other places but never so overt. Never so nonfactual.”
Jacinta Gau, a University of Central Florida professor and expert on race and policing, said new, reform-minded chiefs always face backlash, and that is intensified when they are Black leaders of historically white forces.
“The power dynamic in America has always been that Black people are subordinate to white people. When Black people acquire leadership positions, that power dynamic is flipped on its head and white people who were comfortable with the status quo are now feeling very threatened,” she said.
The backlash against Fitzgerald has intensified since last fall when the City Council began pushing to remove the department’s emblem — a green-eyed, red-bodied, winged creature known as a griffin that had adorned patches on officers’ uniforms since the 1960s.
After a messy process, the council voted 5-2 last week to order the department to remove the symbol from its uniforms by the end of September.
It was the latest among several changes the department has made under Fitzgerald that have won praise from Mayor Quentin Hart, most City Council members and some community leaders — while angering the police union, retired officers and conservatives.
A white City Council member running to unseat Hart in November has portrayed herself as a champion of police while vowing to oust Fitzgerald if elected. A political action committee supporting her and other “pro-law enforcement candidates” called Cedar Valley Backs the Blue has attacked Fitzgerald and Hart on Facebook, claiming they are mismanaging the department.
Three of Fitzgerald’s predecessors as chief released a letter saying they were outraged at what the department had become under his leadership, claiming it was “imploding” and that morale had hit an all-time low.
Adding to the backlash is that Fitzgerald is an outsider to Waterloo with academic degrees some critics mock as elitist. He acknowledges “it didn’t look good” when news emerged that he was a finalist for chief openings in bigger cities during his first year.
Opponents have attacked everything from Fitzgerald’s salary — which is in line with similar chiefs in Iowa — to his off-duty trips to visit family in Texas, where his teenage son continues treatment for a brain tumor that was removed in 2019.
Last year, he took over a department that has long experienced tension with the city’s Black community, which comprises 17% of the city population.
Hart said Waterloo could have been a hotbed of racial unrest after George Floyd’s death given its history, but Fitzgerald helped ease tensions the day before he was sworn on June 1, 2020, in by meeting with protesters for hours to hear their concerns.
“It was a resetting of the clock moment,” Fitzgerald said.
Numerous changes soon followed: banning chokeholds, outlawing racial profiling, requiring officers to intervene if they see excessive force, and investigating all complaints of misconduct.
The Waterloo Commission on Human Rights called for the removal of the griffin emblem, saying it evoked fear and distrust among some given its resemblance to the KKK symbol.
But generations of Waterloo officers had seen it as a symbol of their vigilance. The Waterloo Police Protective Association, which represents officers, denied it had racist intent and mobilized against its removal.
Fitzgerald, one of a handful of officers of color in the 123-member department, said he was met with fierce pushback when he suggested the department rebrand itself voluntarily before the council acted.
Supporters of the griffin, including the Back the Blue group, framed its removal as an affront to officers.
“The beatdown of our police officers continues,” City Council member Margaret Klein, who is running for mayor, wrote on Facebook, citing the “devastating impact of removing the beloved 50-year patch design.” She has called for Fitzgerald’s resignation.
Hart said the debate over the griffin missed the bigger picture. He said the department has undergone a “complete paradigm shift,” adopting a community policing model that has been popular.
“Decency and respect, that’s what I want. But I’m pro-law enforcement,” said Hart, who was elected in 2015 and re-elected in 2017 and 2019.
The Back the Blue group has labeled Hart a “radical mayor” and released an anonymous survey taken by half the current officers and dozens of retirees showing all 98 believed Fitzgerald was the wrong man for the job. Officers complained that they didn’t feel supported by the community or the administration.
“It’s sad and it’s pathetic but this is what’s going on at the Waterloo Police Department,” said group chairman Lynn Moller, a retired investigator.
Fitzgerald said officer morale is a national problem and Waterloo has eight vacancies after some officers retired or left for other jobs. He proposed a strategic plan to improve morale and hire more officers in coming years.
City Council member Jonathan Grieder said Fitzgerald had been slandered by people claiming to love the police.
“We are grappling with the very real issues that have long been embedded of race and force and policing,” he said. “I get that some people have never had to reckon with that until now. I get that it’s uncomfortable.”
Here is a link to the video of the radicalized moron.Ted Nugent was publicly called out by a Michigan man after the conservative rocker insulted "punks" who believe in the Black Lives Matter movement.
WMMT reported that the confrontation came during a Republican-backed Constitution Day event in Centreville.
"Aren't there any BLM punks who want to come up and harass me?" Nugent asked the crowd.
Within moments, Jalen Brown approached the stage to challenge the singer.
"What's wrong with Black lives Matter?" Brown demanded to know.
"Black Lives don't give a s**t about Black lives, they're standing by while Blacks are slaughtering each other," Nugent replied. "Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization!"
At that point, Brown took over the microphone.
"Black Lives Matter too! Black lives matter too!" he chanted.
Brown explained to the crowd that Black people had been mistreated throughout history, according to WMMT.
"We're not here by choice," he noted.
We didn't bring you!" someone in the crowd yelled in response.
People chanted "USA" and "All Lives Matter" as Brown left the stage.
Brown later told WMMT that he was offended when Nugent called Black Lives Matter a terrorist organization.
“I love the Constitution, I love the rights it should stand for. There are people who are taking those and misconstruing them and taking them in a different direction than what it should be," Brown remarked.
After the right-wing ginned-up outrage over fake controversy "critical race theory," one Texas school has banned a children's book about Rosa Parks.
During the debate over CRT, many argued that the racist policies banned teaching civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and others, but the outrage was so insistent that the censorship laws were passed anyway.
The backlash already began in August when a Black principal was put on leave because he posted a photo of him and his white wife on Facebook. Now the York, Pennsylvania school is banning books depicting other Black leaders under the guise that it violates the ban on CRT.
Children's book author Brad Meltzer spoke to CNN about his book I Am Rosa Parks, ending up on the ban list. He has penned a series of children-friendly biographical books that describe historic figures and American presidents like Neil Armstrong, Anne Frank, Albert Einstein, Jim Henson, Walt Disney, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington and more. Thus far the group hasn't banned the book about Marin Luther King Jr. but the Rosa Parks book ended up on the list.
"You know, all my friends were so angry, but I was heartbroken," said Meltzer. "I was heartbroken because it means that there are all these students that will never hear the story of Rosa Parks. And that's exactly why I started writing these books, is so kids can see these amazing members of history. They can learn empathy, and compassion, and kindness. They can call it a freeze, but when kids can't get these books, it's a ban. And these kids can't get the story of Rosa Parks or Malala [Yousafzai] or others, it breaks my heart."
He went on to say teachers are starting to say that they're "scared" to even talk about race now.
"Race is a hard subject matter, but nothing good comes from not discussing something that's hard," he said. "And to me, that's what these great leaders always stand for is you have to deal with these issues. If we don't, we can't go forward. What you're seeing now is a pushback against that boogeyman of critical race theory where they are scared of what to do."
"Listen," he continued, "you have an all-white school board who bans a list that is basically almost every person on there, is it a book about someone who's Black or by a Black author? Do the math on that. And when you hit Rosa Parks, a children's book about Rosa Parks, the reason I'm talking to you today is that you realize that in all the fighting back and forth and pointing fingers, we've lost common sense. It's Rosa Parks. You messed up if you're banning Rosa Parks."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/09/22/win-white-power-school-board-meeting-grapevine-tex/
Before all the procedural talk Monday — inspiring and dispiriting by turns — James Whitfield posted a picture on Twitter of himself with his wife, Kerrie, in front of the Grapevine-Colleyville school district administrative building: “Here we are! <3. Still standing strong in the promise that God has something great in store.”
The Midland, Tex., native and former basketball coach would need all the strength he could get. For what the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District’s board of trustees, which is majority-White, had in store for the district’s first Black principal and his supporters was a brazen display of cowardice and structural White power.
We were at a special school board meeting in the suburb of Grapevine, about 20 miles from Dallas — and the key agenda item was nothing less than Whitfield’s job. Whitfield has been on paid administrative leave since late August, a step taken after Stetson Clark, a former school board candidate, in July called for Whitfield’s firing over supposedly “extreme views” on race.
Clark accused Whitfield of promoting critical race theory — a loaded charge here in Texas right now — and the supposed “conspiracy theory” of systemic racism.
Whitfield denies this. “I am not the CRT Boogeyman," he wrote on Facebook. “I believe there is power in understanding varied voices and hearing people with other lived experiences than myself."
In the face of the abuse that followed, Whitfield said he was told to keep his head down and stay positive. But enough became enough, and ultimately he took to Facebook to answer the attack.
“Just because I am a school administrator,” he wrote, “that does not take away my rights and ability to be human and defend myself.”
No, it does not, and particularly not given that the school board never publicly came to his defense. In fact, it did the opposite, imposing that administrative leave — effective immediately.
“I was locked out from my school accounts. They took my keys and told me to have no contact with any students,” Whitfield told me. His profile and picture were removed from the school website, and he wasn’t permitted contact with colleagues. “I couldn’t even wish my best friend a happy birthday.”
It was a stunning way to treat an educator who Colleyville Heritage High School parents and kids alike attest is liked and respected and had done an excellent job in navigating the school through the difficulties of covid-19. One by one, regardless of race, speakers took to the podium Monday in Whitfield’s defense.
Whitfield got only the same one-minute allotment to speak given to the community members. He said he was still the same man the board hired and promoted twice in three years. “So I ask you, what has changed?”
His answer was a shocking picking-apart of his character. Superintendent Robin Ryan and Lance Groppel, the district’s executive director of instructional leadership, alleged that Whitfield “lacked situational awareness.” He was spreading “mistruths to the media.” He was “dividing large portions of the community” and broke the school board’s code of ethics. He was “disrespectful,” “unreasonable” and “insubordinate.”
The crowd half-laughed, half-gasped at the string of absurdities. And several minutes later came the verdict: a unanimous vote to give notice that Whitfield’s contract would not be recommended for renewal.
“It is not about critical race theory," Ryan claimed of the action of the board members, all but one of whom are White. Well, that much we can agree on. It was much worse than that. This was a Black man being punished for speaking in his own defense, and Whitfield saw it the same way. “Oh, 100 percent,” he told me. “But I had to speak out — no one was defending me.”
The officials accused Whitfield of bringing negative publicity to the district — ridiculous considering they seem dead set on making headlines for taking a page out of segregationist history.
What is happening in this affluent, majority-White Texas school district is indeed reminiscent of the White backlash to school integration in the 1950s and ’60s. Across the country then, many White families resisted having their children taught by Black teachers or led by Black principals, pushing dedicated and talented educators out of the profession.
Now, under the guise of combating critical race theory, we’re seeing the cycle play out again. In nearby Southlake, another wealthy White suburb, four administrators left the district after backlash over diversity plans. As such districts become more diverse, it’s clear that the critical race theory canard is part of a new wave from the same old sea of American white supremacy in education.
And at the end of the day, it will be Texas schoolchildren who will be left to drown in ignorance.
After the Grapevine-Colleyville meeting concluded, sophomore Rafaela Roa burst into tears. She was embraced by her mother, who also had tears in her eyes, and Roa’s father embraced them both. It was a family lesson in coping in the face of injustice. “It’s not over, honey,” her mother, Coco, said. “It’s just a process … the fight has just begun.” Indeed, Whitfield vowed to me that he would not resign.
I was impressed by Whitfield’s resolve, but I shared this family’s pain. There was no way around it. Injustice and white power had won the day, once again, in Grapevine-Colleyville.
Something I've noticed about racists is, they expect the people they dislike to part for them like the red sea everywhere they go. If a black man gets a job at a place full of racists, the ensuing conflict is the fault of the black man. He should have known his place and everything would have been fine.
How many times do you think something along the lines of 'I am not racist but I don't like them mixing with us' was said down there?Something I've noticed about racists is, they expect the people they dislike to part for them like the red sea everywhere they go. If a black man gets a job at a place full of racists, the ensuing conflict is the fault of the black man. He should have known his place and everything would have been fine.
Exactly. I've spent some time in east texas and the whole, "they do their thing over there and we do our thing over here" isn't something that's hidden, nor does it need to be inferred. They'll say it aloud, comfortably, because that's not what they think racism is. They think as long as you're not beating/murdering black people, you're all good.How many times do you think something along the lines of 'I am not racist but I don't like them mixing with us' was said down there?
That is another classic tell I find that racists do.Exactly. I've spent some time in east texas and the whole, "they do their thing over there and we do our thing over here" isn't something that's hidden, nor does it need to be inferred. They'll say it aloud, comfortably, because that's not what they think racism is. They think as long as you're not beating/murdering black people, you're all good.