DIY with Quantum Boards

dro-man80

Well-Known Member
I still can't get pictures to load but only have a week or two left of flowering
They look damn good
The Two plants directly under the 90 watt kit will be over a qp easy so I'm not mad
Room for improvement but these lights are the truth
U feel in ur opinion they match or are on par with the CXBs?
 

dro-man80

Well-Known Member
perfect,,after reading 100 plus pages on these QBs its going down.....Going to probably use these in new room..Waiting on @robincnn to get back with me,,,,but if all goes as I am hoping I will bang out 4 to 5 thousand watts of QBs in flower room...Very excited over here,very excited...This could possibly be the next game changer for me,,Just did NOT feel like building 70 plus CXBs again...Burnt myself out building those effing things lol,,,thanks for the fast reply,much appreciated...much love and peace..:peace::weed:
 

BobCajun

Well-Known Member
If people didn't mind a little less efficiency, higher price and longer thinner shape they could get the high power ones. The kind in the Quantums are the most lumens for the lowest price, just that they seem to be hard to find in stock. I think you could put 6 of these other ones on a HLG-320.
 

pop22

Well-Known Member
I don't see that they are higher power, and they are way, less efficient. At the same wattage, the QB puts out 50l/watt more! Thats almost 40% more for the QB

If people didn't mind a little less efficiency, higher price and longer thinner shape they could get the high power ones. The kind in the Quantums are the most lumens for the lowest price, just that they seem to be hard to find in stock. I think you could put 6 of these other ones on a HLG-320.
 

BobCajun

Well-Known Member
I don't see that they are higher power, and they are way, less efficient. At the same wattage, the QB puts out 50l/watt more! Thats almost 40% more for the QB
That was the warm white type I linked, the cooler ones have higher output, closer to 150 lm/w. It's just another option. It's high power because it takes a lot fewer LEDs to put out the same lumens.
 
Last edited:

robincnn

Well-Known Member
trying best to get boards and heatsinks soon. production scheduled for a big batch this month. Sorry will take a few weeks.
@Stephenj37826 and I have been trying improve board, heastink designs. Will have more flexibility with new boards, heatsinks and kits.
Along with high voltage old QB304 we will also testing a new

QB 288
18x16
pacman ate the center diodes so that it will work with 54V :hump:
upload_2017-3-1_22-25-1.png
 

ThaiBaby1

Well-Known Member
trying best to get boards and heatsinks soon. production scheduled for a big batch this month. Sorry will take a few weeks.
@Stephenj37826 and I have been trying improve board, heastink designs. Will have more flexibility with new boards, heatsinks and kits.
Along with high voltage old QB304 we will also testing a new

QB 288
18x16
pacman ate the center diodes so that it will work with 54V :hump:
View attachment 3897671
advantages of this design?
 

sixstring2112

Well-Known Member
trying best to get boards and heatsinks soon. production scheduled for a big batch this month. Sorry will take a few weeks.
@Stephenj37826 and I have been trying improve board, heastink designs. Will have more flexibility with new boards, heatsinks and kits.
Along with high voltage old QB304 we will also testing a new

QB 288
18x16
pacman ate the center diodes so that it will work with 54V :hump:
View attachment 3897671
i see 2700k designation along with 3000k,4000k,5000k on the bottom of the board,i would be mucho interested in the 2700k boards in the older bigger design :)
 
Top