srg.bigbud
Member
some people say it works and some says it doesnt work....i read where it only works on certain strains. what is everyone's opion.
Thing is others have done side-by-side comparisons with control groups of cloned plants (genetically identical) and found that the only reason the buds looked and in fact were frostier and heavier was the added 3 or 4 days before cropping, lights on or not. One would have to weigh out buds that seemed frostier in a controlled setting by comparison to determine if what seemed frostier actually translates into heavier or more resin to back up the assumption. The placebo effect can fool you thoroughly, much akin to a subject under hypnosis. So it requires far more than the buds looked or seemed frostier. Not meaning to dis your efforts, but too many who've done exacting comparisons repeatedly over successive crops say otherwise. Even the Guru of Ganga, Ed Rosenthal calims an extended darkness prior to harvest has no effect worth attempting.I've done 48 hours of darkness and none whatsoever and I can say the dark period makes your buds frostier.
NO.waste of time.some people say it works and some says it doesnt work....i read where it only works on certain strains. what is everyone's opion.
I didn't argue in favor or against flushing or darkness before harvest. I don't get into these silly arguments. I was stating to the OP that he was about to get a bunch of conflicting answers and that he should try them all himself to get his own answers. I know what happens in nature and what doesn't. I know what is common sense and what isn't. However, What I know has no bearing on other peoples ignorance.Amaximus-
But the numbers tip heavily on both issues in favor of just following what's happened in Nature for thousands of years. Nutes get depleted in the ground to zilch by harvest, so feeding up till the day of harvest is pointless. And there's no place on earth, ever, where plants experience several days of darkness. So when you tweak what happens in Nature so far out of the ballpark, it invariably amounts to a whole lot of placebo effect and nothing else. Some just are dying so much to make some high tech breakthrough or effect the genetics in surreal ways to get off the charts results they're willing to con themselves it actually works. No hard nosed scientific evidence has been able to support the idea extended darkness has any such effect. And, just like some are more easily hypnotized than others, some are more susceptible to being influenced by the placebo effect than others.
Think you misinterpreted where I was coming from with my comment. Reading it again I can see how you did.I didn't argue in favor or against flushing or darkness before harvest. I don't get into these silly arguments. I was stating to the OP that he was about to get a bunch of conflicting answers and that he should try them all himself to get his own answers. I know what happens in nature and what doesn't. I know what is common sense and what isn't. However, What I know has no bearing on other peoples ignorance.