Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
Dude, he said it. Facts, you know, they matter.
Hey dog, heres one for you. nitro




Former Attorney General Gonzales says Trump has right to question judge's objectivity
Published June 06, 2016
Fox News Latino



  • Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. (COURTESY ALBERTO GONZALES)
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says that Donald Trump should not be criticized for raising questions about a Latino judge’s impartiality in a lawsuit accusing the mogul of fraud in his Trump University program.

Gonzales, who served as White House counsel and U.S. attorney general in the George W. Bush administration, said that while a judge should not be questioned about his ability or integrity based on race or ethnicity alone, Trump does have basis for concern about Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s ability to treat him fairly.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Hey dog, heres one for you. nitro




Former Attorney General Gonzales says Trump has right to question judge's objectivity
Published June 06, 2016
Fox News Latino



  • Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. (COURTESY ALBERTO GONZALES)
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says that Donald Trump should not be criticized for raising questions about a Latino judge’s impartiality in a lawsuit accusing the mogul of fraud in his Trump University program.

Gonzales, who served as White House counsel and U.S. attorney general in the George W. Bush administration, said that while a judge should not be questioned about his ability or integrity based on race or ethnicity alone, Trump does have basis for concern about Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s ability to treat him fairly.
Ahhaaahaaahaaaaa, what a weak minded post. So now two people are defending Trump, you and him. So what? You are losing it Nitro.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I just report the facts from the latino news. The judge is toast. imo nitro
Wanna bet? Let's give it a month. If by July 8, the judge still presides over Trump's case, you end this thread and no longer say anything about Trump on RIU. If he is no longer on this case by July 8, I'll stop posting on RIU until the end of the election.
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
Wanna bet? Let's give it a month. If by July 8, the judge still presides over Trump's case, you end this thread and no longer say anything about Trump on RIU. If he is no longer on this case by July 8, I'll stop posting on RIU until the end of the election.
Thats funny. lol

This will never see the light of day this summer. And besides that I don't make bets with people I don't trust any farther than the door jam. nitro.
 

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
The problem with you is you want to think you are are smarter than people that disagree with you , but you over look common sense when you make up excuses for the facts. Like the young people just didn't sign up after the dems said thats what it would take to work.

Why would politicians choke down and ignore the fact that the one thing that was missing for Obamacare to work were the young sign ups? It didn't happen to work out like the dems wanted it to and somebody has to call bullshit, like the congress did. nitro
Young people, mostly, were now still on their parents health coverage and others who were Medicaid eligible and finally you just have rebels who refused to participate in the program and just pay the fine not enroll the ACA was new and not everyone was on board.

Look I'm sure many folks would happily trade off paying more money for having their child (teen) covered and pre-existing conditions covered.

Ever tried getting coverage with cancer under the old system?

I being a Christian man have no problem paying more to make sure you get what I have, coverage.

B4L
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
Young people, mostly, were now still on their parents health coverage and others who were Medicaid eligible and finally you just have rebels who refused to participate in the program and just pay the fine not enroll the ACA was new and not everyone was on board.

Look I'm sure many folks would happily trade off paying more money for having their child (teen) covered and pre-existing conditions covered.

Ever tried getting coverage with cancer under the old system?

I being a Christian man have no problem paying more to make sure you get what I have, coverage.

B4L
Hey B4L, To be honest with you, I have thought you have been more sensible than most here, and good explanation. When the government extended coverage for their children to the age of 26 that was great. But then the dems admitted that they needed those young people to pay as a sales point for Obamacare to become reality. The Obama admin, uses tactics like this for just about everything and it never ends well.

The old system was great in Oregon and people actually moved to Oregon with health issues that were taken care of no matter what their issues were. It was a program called OMIP, it had no pre existing condition policy's. And then after Obamacare all of the people that had wonderful healthcare through OMIP were kicked to the curb because of the ACA. Then the rates went through the roof after the first year and then the rates went through the roof on the second year and then it went bankrupt at the beginning of the third year.

My point being is why didn't the nation just have a program like Oregon had? I was on OMIP for five years with zero increases and I wish I had it back. nitro
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
Ah yes, Socialism in the Oregon Health Plan!

:mrgreen:
Rolli, I don't know if it was socialism. It was only available to people with pre existing conditions, and only after three other companies turned you down. And then you had to wait for six months before you qualified . And it wasn't free, but it was definitely better and cheaper than where we are at now. And it is not the oregon health plan it was called the "Oregon medical insurance pool". nitro
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rolli, I don't know if it was socialism. It was only available to people with pre existing conditions, and only after three other companies turned you down. And then you had to wait for six months before you qualified . And it wasn't free, but it was definitely better and cheaper than where we are at now. And it is not the oregon health plan it was called the "Oregon medical insurance pool". nitro
nothing socialist about socializing the costs of elderly, infirm weaklings like yourself.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Thats funny. lol

This will never see the light of day this summer. And besides that I don't make bets with people I don't trust any farther than the door jam. nitro.
Yeah yeah, not til the fall. LOL. The trial is scheduled for November. So you are a loudmouth with nothing to say then. Trump is screaming like the man baby he is about unfair treatment. Never mind deliberate fraud that he perpetrated. After Trump accused the court of witholding information about the "validity of his position", it was unfair to release the course and sales literature guiding people to target people that would be hurt the worst.

You say the judge will be toast but you have not the guts to stand by your words. Empty words and chickenshit is what some people might call that. Not me, but some people.
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
Yeah yeah, not til the fall. LOL. The trial is scheduled for November. So you are a loudmouth with nothing to say then. Trump is screaming like the man baby he is about unfair treatment. Never mind deliberate fraud that he perpetrated. After Trump accused the court of witholding information about the "validity of his position", it was unfair to release the course and sales literature guiding people to target people that would be hurt the worst.

You say the judge will be toast but you have not the guts to stand by your words. Empty words and chickenshit is what some people might call that. Not me, but some people.
Sorry about your luck dude. grab a hanky and quit crying. nitro
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top