WHODAT@THADOR
Well-Known Member
A market thread would be awesome who could make that happen??Awesome post man. I need more of that in my infancy.
There's a few of you guys here that I really could learn from.
We need a market thread here.
A market thread would be awesome who could make that happen??Awesome post man. I need more of that in my infancy.
There's a few of you guys here that I really could learn from.
We need a market thread here.
yea but the market and politics go pretty good togetherYou guys who want to talk about trading, go the the BLACK BRIEFCASE forum. There's already a few threads on it there.
https://www.rollitup.org/f/the-black-briefcase.95/
The only problem is, you will have a limited audience to share your "art" with.yea but the market and politics go pretty good together
Well, it is a good forum, and I know there are some novices in there who would appreciate your experience and enthusiasm.LOL...its all good i was just given a little H.B.O. ......I actually had never heard of the black briefcase till now
91.8 million unemployed
Since when did labour force statistics include children under 16?so all of these 91.8 million people are looking for work and can't find it?
you're literally trying to count 4 year old children as "unemployed"?
![]()
NO.........some have given up!so all of these 91.8 million people are looking for work and can't find it?
you're literally trying to count 4 year old children as "unemployed"?
![]()
Since when did labour force statistics include children under 16?
before we get into that, please look up the term "working aged american"then show me how you arrive at 91.8 million unemployed then.
i just assumed that since you counted a full 30% of the nation as unemployed, you must have been counting every child in the nation, even those fresh out of the womb.
before we get into that, please look up the term "working aged american"
I'm bewildered you would even mention children under 16 in a discussion regarding employment etc.
An example of staggeringly retarded would be to suggest that 4 year old children would be included in labour forces participation. Maybe in russia comrade, I tried to take you seriously until you mouth sharted that oneaccording to your own number of "91.8 million unemployed", that would have to include at least a few million children.
unless, of course, you think that retired people are "unemployed", which is staggeringly retarded, even by sock puppet standards.
Yes that seems to be the resounding consensus around here - and we all know consensus is the new scientific standardTaking Uncle Four Year Old seriously is not worth your effort earnest_voice.
Yes that seems to be the resounding consensus around here - and we all know consensus is the new scientific standard![]()
An example of staggeringly retarded would be to suggest that 4 year old children would be included in labour forces participation. Maybe in russia comrade, I tried to take you seriously until you mouth sharted that one
the WSJ told me soif you're not counting kids, then how do you get to "91.8 million unemployed" then?
are you counting retired people as unemployed?
are you counting students as unemployed?
are you counting people who are not even looking for work as unemployed?
go ahead and explain to me how you reach this magical number.