Economists thrilled at latest Obama jobs report

yea but the market and politics go pretty good together
The only problem is, you will have a limited audience to share your "art" with.
At least in the BB thread, you'll find more participants (who would probably gain from such discussion). But that's just a suggestion for your benefit, if your goal is to maximize the potential of discourse. Feel free to post away, I'll just gloss over it.
 
91.8 million unemployed

so all of these 91.8 million people are looking for work and can't find it?

you're literally trying to count 4 year old children as "unemployed"?

Desperation_of_Shearer.jpg
 
Since when did labour force statistics include children under 16?

then show me how you arrive at 91.8 million unemployed then.

i just assumed that since you counted a full 30% of the nation as unemployed, you must have been counting every child in the nation, even those fresh out of the womb.
 
then show me how you arrive at 91.8 million unemployed then.

i just assumed that since you counted a full 30% of the nation as unemployed, you must have been counting every child in the nation, even those fresh out of the womb.
before we get into that, please look up the term "working aged american"

I'm bewildered you would even mention children under 16 in a discussion regarding employment etc.
 
before we get into that, please look up the term "working aged american"

I'm bewildered you would even mention children under 16 in a discussion regarding employment etc.

according to your own number of "91.8 million unemployed", that would have to include at least a few million children.

unless, of course, you think that retired people are "unemployed", which is staggeringly retarded, even by sock puppet standards.
 
according to your own number of "91.8 million unemployed", that would have to include at least a few million children.

unless, of course, you think that retired people are "unemployed", which is staggeringly retarded, even by sock puppet standards.
An example of staggeringly retarded would be to suggest that 4 year old children would be included in labour forces participation. Maybe in russia comrade, I tried to take you seriously until you mouth sharted that one
 
Yes that seems to be the resounding consensus around here - and we all know consensus is the new scientific standard :)

Don't worry, by weeks end you'll probably have a dossier in Uncle Communists filing cabinet under "white supremist racists" like the rest of us. You'll give two shits about that as much as the rest of us do.
 
An example of staggeringly retarded would be to suggest that 4 year old children would be included in labour forces participation. Maybe in russia comrade, I tried to take you seriously until you mouth sharted that one

if you're not counting kids, then how do you get to "91.8 million unemployed" then?

are you counting retired people as unemployed?

are you counting students as unemployed?

are you counting people who are not even looking for work as unemployed?

go ahead and explain to me how you reach this magical number.
 
if you're not counting kids, then how do you get to "91.8 million unemployed" then?

are you counting retired people as unemployed?

are you counting students as unemployed?

are you counting people who are not even looking for work as unemployed?

go ahead and explain to me how you reach this magical number.
the WSJ told me so :clap: just like your unattributed copy and paste that kicked off the thread.
 
Back
Top