Flush or Fade?

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
I got asked about this in a PM by a member after seeing the disaster another thread became. He asked where to find books and papers on "flushing" and said he might try the "fade".

Here's my answer to him......I felt it needs to be seen,,,,,,again!

Your looking for post grad work. You would do better to search papers......The thing is, NOTHING in agriculture gets 'flushed" and that leads to little to no research in the area. You see, the thing is, the whole "idea" of "flushing is nonsense! Plants don't work that way! They do not take up nutrients or salts as most of you think of them! They do not "store" them in the sense you think of them! Not only that, but the nutritional "stores" in a plant are not in buds or budding or flowers! NO amount of "flushing" will "exchange" plant "stored" nutrition back "out" of the plant! Scientifically impossible by the way most of you guys understand......Ok, that's my word on "flushing". (No one listens to this in threads if they don't want to hear it or accept it.)

Now then, you propose the "FADE TO FINISH" method. Great idea in theory but, and this IS a BIG BUT! Remember when I said above that "the nutritional "stores" in a plant are not in buds or budding or flowers!" ? This shoots that theory in the ass right away. You see the main amount of stored nutrition is in either the roots and the rest in leaves and some in small amounts in transit in the phloam (the sap that actually moves the nutrients around the plant)......

Now when you "starve a plant" it will draw from it's self by actually breaking down the needed parts of it's self to do an "emergency" attempt to reproduce! (This can happen in certain plants even in veg! A kind of last ditch effort to continue the species.)

With that in mind you take the fact that the plant is not "moving" nutrients "out" of buds, but into them to speed growth and as fast as it can - "reproduce". This single minded process the plant now puts it's self on causes the plant to stress it's self. This self induced stress can, in many cases if done long enough, lead the plant to go bisexual, and produce "banana's" in a last ditch effort to reproduce and "carry on the line" and produce seeds...

Basically put, In reality you are moving nutrients that you're "attempting" to get rid of,,right to where your trying to remove them from! You are also stressing the plant in the way for "Herming" to actually happen easier!

I and many others that have tried to convey this actual plant science, are called everything you can think of and those 'impossible of understanding these facts", fight so hard against us that many of us have simply chosen to avoid the issue or don't fight to hard.

Anyway, there you are in as short and sweet and as simple/understandable as I can...

The thing is you have to understand Botany and Horticulture (and there are LOTS of subsections to those that are involved here) to truly put together the pieces of the puzzle to get your head wrapped around the idea that flushing and the "fade" don't work for what they are intended or alleged to actually do!

There you go Mods, nice, polite and to the point. (Sorry about the other thread Sunni)

There you go, Now have at it!
I'm stepping back to watch the circus.
 
Last edited:

zeddd

Well-Known Member
I got asked about this in a PM by a member after seeing the disaster another thread became. He asked where to find books and papers on "flushing" and said he might try the "fade".

Here's my answer to him......I felt it needs to be seen,,,,,,again!

Your looking for post grad work. You would do better to search papers......The thing is, NOTHING in agriculture gets 'flushed" and that leads to little to no research in the area. You see, the thing is, the whole "idea" of "flushing is nonsense! Plants don't work that way! They do not take up nutrients or salts as most of you think of them! They do not "store" them in the sense you think of them! Not only that, but the nutritional "stores" in a plant are not in buds or budding or flowers! NO amount of "flushing" will "exchange" plant "stored" nutrition back "out" of the plant! Scientifically impossible by the way most of you guys understand......Ok, that's my word on "flushing". (No one listens to this in threads if they don't want to hear it or accept it.)

Now then, you propose the "FADE TO FINISH" method. Great idea in theory but, and this IS a BIG BUT! Remember when I said above that "the nutritional "stores" in a plant are not in buds or budding or flowers!" ? This shoots that theory in the ass right away. You see the main amount of stored nutrition is in either the roots and the rest in leaves and some in small amounts in transit in the phloam (the sap that actually moves the nutrients around the plant)......

Now when you "starve a plant" it will draw from it's self by actually breaking down the needed parts of it's self to do an "emergency" attempt to reproduce! (This can happen in certain plants even in veg! A kind of last ditch effort to continue the species.)

With that in mind you take the fact that the plant is not "moving" nutrients "out" of buds, but into them to speed growth and as fast as it can - "reproduce". This single minded process the plant now puts it's self on causes the plant to stress it's self. This self induced stress can, in many cases if done long enough, lead the plant to go bisexual, and produce "banana's" in a last ditch effort to reproduce and "carry on the line" and produce seeds...

Basically put, In reality you are moving nutrients that you're "attempting" to get rid of,,right to where your trying to remove them from! You are also stressing the plant in the way for "Herming" to actually happen easier!

I and many others that have tried to convey this actual plant science, are called everything you can think of and those 'impossible of understanding these facts", fight so hard against us that many of us have simply chosen to avoid the issue or don't fight to hard.

Anyway, there you are in as short and sweet and as simple/understandable as I can...

The thing is you have to understand Botany and Horticulture (and there are LOTS of subsections to those that are involved here) to truly put together the pieces of the puzzle to get your head wrapped around the idea that flushing and the "fade" don't work for what they are intended or alleged to actually do!

There you go Mods, nice, polite and to the point. (Sorry about the other thread Sunni)

There you go, Now have at it!
I'm stepping back to watch the circus.
Passive aggression, flushing thread lol
 

Alexander Supertramp

Well-Known Member
I got asked about this in a PM by a member after seeing the disaster another thread became. He asked where to find books and papers on "flushing" and said he might try the "fade".

Here's my answer to him......I felt it needs to be seen,,,,,,again!

Your looking for post grad work. You would do better to search papers......The thing is, NOTHING in agriculture gets 'flushed" and that leads to little to no research in the area. You see, the thing is, the whole "idea" of "flushing is nonsense! Plants don't work that way! They do not take up nutrients or salts as most of you think of them! They do not "store" them in the sense you think of them! Not only that, but the nutritional "stores" in a plant are not in buds or budding or flowers! NO amount of "flushing" will "exchange" plant "stored" nutrition back "out" of the plant! Scientifically impossible by the way most of you guys understand......Ok, that's my word on "flushing". (No one listens to this in threads if they don't want to hear it or accept it.)

Now then, you propose the "FADE TO FINISH" method. Great idea in theory but, and this IS a BIG BUT! Remember when I said above that "the nutritional "stores" in a plant are not in buds or budding or flowers!" ? This shoots that theory in the ass right away. You see the main amount of stored nutrition is in either the roots and the rest in leaves and some in small amounts in transit in the phloam (the sap that actually moves the nutrients around the plant)......

Now when you "starve a plant" it will draw from it's self by actually breaking down the needed parts of it's self to do an "emergency" attempt to reproduce! (This can happen in certain plants even in veg! A kind of last ditch effort to continue the species.)

With that in mind you take the fact that the plant is not "moving" nutrients "out" of buds, but into them to speed growth and as fast as it can - "reproduce". This single minded process the plant now puts it's self on causes the plant to stress it's self. This self induced stress can, in many cases if done long enough, lead the plant to go bisexual, and produce "banana's" in a last ditch effort to reproduce and "carry on the line" and produce seeds...

Basically put, In reality you are moving nutrients that you're "attempting" to get rid of,,right to where your trying to remove them from! You are also stressing the plant in the way for "Herming" to actually happen easier!

I and many others that have tried to convey this actual plant science, are called everything you can think of and those 'impossible of understanding these facts", fight so hard against us that many of us have simply chosen to avoid the issue or don't fight to hard.

Anyway, there you are in as short and sweet and as simple/understandable as I can...

The thing is you have to understand Botany and Horticulture (and there are LOTS of subsections to those that are involved here) to truly put together the pieces of the puzzle to get your head wrapped around the idea that flushing and the "fade" don't work for what they are intended or alleged to actually do!

There you go Mods, nice, polite and to the point. (Sorry about the other thread Sunni)

There you go, Now have at it!
I'm stepping back to watch the circus.

And needs to be seen again. Well put Doc.
 

bgmike8

Well-Known Member
Nope
Not at all

Does it look like any of my plants are "suffering"?
Pics are day 69 from flip. Harvest day. No co2, no boosters. Feed, water, feed, water. Feed is 1480ppm. If I don't feed heavy, by week 5 my plants will look like above, maybe not as yellow. But you get the idea.

View attachment 3790789 View attachment 3790790
I wouldn't mind having those right now.

So what do you do to fade?
And although they look good, surely if the plant is starved then it will focus on survival more than bud production. No??
 

DemonTrich

Well-Known Member
20160707_132416.jpg
some tasty darlins net

It's not actually starving. It's using the stored nutes in the fans for food. Kind of like how a clone uses its stored nutes in its fans to feed the clone and start growing roots and what not. If I notice yellowing before my 2 week mark, I'll hit them with a 100% feed. But my last 2 weeks it's just plain 6.5ph bubbled h20. Just enough to see some run-off. 20 gallons is good for my 12 4.5gal pots, and 3 3.7gal side pots every 4th day. I also drop the temps like a mad man. 2 weeks until chop, 75 lights on, 70 lights off.
Last week, 70 lights on, 65 lights off. Brings out purples and pinks in nearly all my 15 strains
 

bgmike8

Well-Known Member
Your a smart dude. Tell me what you think of this study.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/41113/InTech-Plant_responses_to_sugar_starvation.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwimtfjdxKnPAhVDw4MKHf-6AgUQFggjMAE&usg=AFQjCNFDxjQKdjcPihYFjIMSgNhe1-Y9vQ&sig2=NAym89OZo1sGccTbf_0qng

I think that while it is eating it's stores its metabolism is gearing towards survival and not as efficient at growing bud....

Kinda like when we stop adding food to our bodies.
I don't like to anthromorphize but look at that research paper
 

DemonTrich

Well-Known Member
Honestly, I'm pretty high, although I have bad ass eyesight, it's hard to read. Lol. I'll give it a go tonorrow. Does it specifically say cannabis? It's all trial and error. It's taken me 4yrs and 10 different cloning gels to find the baddest one and cheapest at that. I cut 4 to 5 days off my cloning time every run the last 9 months, and with better root mass. But this is about fade. I've yet to have any of my 15 strains toss a nanner period, let alone from doing a water only last 2 weeks. Those who flush only give water last 2 weeks. Albeit a super flood of water, while you tell your plants "dont drown". Imo, drawing would be more stressful and cause even the baddest girl to throw nanners. Just my opinion


The buds are the "flowers", like a rose on a bush. No?
 

Indagrow

Well-Known Member
Your a smart dude. Tell me what you think of this study.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/41113/InTech-Plant_responses_to_sugar_starvation.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwimtfjdxKnPAhVDw4MKHf-6AgUQFggjMAE&usg=AFQjCNFDxjQKdjcPihYFjIMSgNhe1-Y9vQ&sig2=NAym89OZo1sGccTbf_0qng

I think that while it is eating it's stores its metabolism is gearing towards survival and not as efficient at growing bud....

Kinda like when we stop adding food to our bodies.
I don't like to anthromorphize but look at that research paper
Interesting read, reaffirmed my thoughts on the matter, I was interested to find this little bit... "At the cellular level, sugar starvation in senescent organs and in organs that have not initiated the senescence program causes similar or identical symptoms: degradation of cellular structures and degradation of many cellular components, such as proteins and lipids" could be utilized for making 'cleaner' concentrates as we aim to remove lipids with other processing steps

That's assuming bud falls into that category of course, which would certainly cover sugar leaves but I'm not sure if the flower itself would be. Either way the fade seems counter productive from what I've read including that paper
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
Your a smart dude. Tell me what you think of this study.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/41113/InTech-Plant_responses_to_sugar_starvation.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwimtfjdxKnPAhVDw4MKHf-6AgUQFggjMAE&usg=AFQjCNFDxjQKdjcPihYFjIMSgNhe1-Y9vQ&sig2=NAym89OZo1sGccTbf_0qng

I think that while it is eating it's stores its metabolism is gearing towards survival and not as efficient at growing bud....

Kinda like when we stop adding food to our bodies.
I don't like to anthromorphize but look at that research paper
If I didn't say so when you sent me that Mike - great paper and good find!

Interesting read, reaffirmed my thoughts on the matter, I was interested to find this little bit... "At the cellular level, sugar starvation in senescent organs and in organs that have not initiated the senescence program causes similar or identical symptoms: degradation of cellular structures and degradation of many cellular components, such as proteins and lipids" could be utilized for making 'cleaner' concentrates as we aim to remove lipids with other processing steps

That's assuming bud falls into that category of course, which would certainly cover sugar leaves but I'm not sure if the flower itself would be. Either way the fade seems counter productive from what I've read including that paper



Hmm, I considered the same aspect when I read that too. I came to the same conclusions based on the same Botanical reasons!


 
Last edited:
Top