Kassiopeija
Well-Known Member
For example, I can tell you that their claims of 3.2-3.4 umol/j for some of their products are not even backed up by a sphere or goniometer test – by their own admission!
Crescience PAR database
We put our LED products through their paces under real conditions. The measurements take place in a closed test environment. In contrast to tests in an integrating sphere, the results are therefore subject to losses that are also present in a normal installation environment. For example, reflection losses on the walls and the power loss of the power supply.
@Prawn Connery here in the german-speaking growlight market there are a number of manufacturers who have exactly the same narrative - they all ignore Ulbricht-integr.spheres measurements but instead calculate PPF and PPE from their own crudely fashioned PPFD-plots. And they all advocate that as proper, and the real test as ill...It is impossible to measure diode efficiency using a hand-held PAR meter. Unless you are God and can measure every single photon. Even spheres are not 100% accurate.
But, when they cross-test their products they get sometimes completely different readings, like 50% less light in the corner. Or, +-20% system efficacy.
Even the very same light driven with the same current gets differently raw photon output "calculated" when distance is changed or walls are removed.
They just want to save the money for a proper light-lab and thus tell this nonsense to their customers. And most there believe, even refer, that!