Guns & Gun Violence

2ANONYMOUS said:

I think they do not need to worry about guns but they need to up the retard hospitals in the USA
PS i just ordered a M4 carbon assault rifle 419 bucks with couple parts few more rails for to make it look real pretty threaded barrel for the silencer add on you know, for stealth and o course 5.56 green tip 62 grain Full metal jacket
I;ll make sure to post pictures when it arrives UPS lol

PS whats the odds i can find on the net how to DIY a M4 to fully auto anyone

Click to expand...

Can you post a link to your "M4 CARBON assault rifle" for, what I'm assuming you mean as $419.

You're new to guns. Enjoy! You'll have tons of fun!

Btw, you wont be receiving it via UPS. So there's that. Unless of course you are an FFL.

spandy said:

I've never heard a dog quack before.

But if a dog did quack, it should expect to get the attention it deserves.

Click to expand...

#Privilege

spandy said:

The "problem" of people owning firearms is what they want to solve.

Fuck em. You can't change the 2nd without a war and a new constitution, and we have all the guns.

Click to expand...

God, you sound tough. I'll bet you were looking in the mirror when you typed that.

desert dude said:

What "problem" are you trying to solve, exactly?

Click to expand...

Cool chart. Except it in no way draws a direct correlation between the two.

It is not, as if to say, "because more guns, therefore less crime rates".

2ANONYMOUS said:

PS whats the odds i can find on the net how to DIY a M4 to fully auto anyone

Click to expand...

very easily. m16 parts and a lightning link will do the trick quite easily.

but, you WILL get caught, and you WILL go to federal prison. no if ands or buts about it.

2ANONYMOUS said:

I think they do not need to worry about guns but they need to up the retard hospitals in the USA
PS i just ordered a M4 carbon assault rifle 419 bucks with couple parts few more rails for to make it look real pretty threaded barrel for the silencer add on you know, for stealth and o course 5.56 green tip 62 grain Full metal jacket
I;ll make sure to post pictures when it arrives UPS lol

PS whats the odds i can find on the net how to DIY a M4 to fully auto anyone

Click to expand...

you won't be getting a silencer unless you have a class III license. suppressor would be the correct term.

and just file down the sear and she'll rock and roll.

cannabineer said:

But you are speaking as if the "stricter checks" get anything DONE.
I contend that they do not and are playing into the disarmers' agenda, the death of our civil rights by ten thousand mouse bites.

You cannot simultaneously hold both views.

Click to expand...

I agree that upping checks is not the total answer. It may be only a small part of the answer, if that. The truth is, I don't know.

But it seems reasonable. And to oppose it seems unreasonable.

What do you think we should do in response to all the shootings? What would cannabineer's plan be to reduce them?

bearkat42 said:

Obviously speaking as someone who isn't regularly profiled.

Click to expand...

Yes, unfortunately you are absolutely right, and I would have no idea how it would feel to be the object of constant observation. And it's really tough, because it is solely based off appearance.

That's what makes terrorists [and crazy fucks] so scary. So how do we stop them?

rkymtnman said:

you won't be getting a silencer unless you have a class III license. suppressor would be the correct term.

and just file down the sear and she'll rock and roll.

Click to expand...

Silencer is a BATF term, so is suppressor; so both are correct.

And you don't need a Class III License, nor an SOT to own a silencer. I should know. I own 4.

And no, that's not how you get full auto.

bearkat42 said:

God, you sound tough. I'll bet you were looking in the mirror when you typed that.

Click to expand...

Did you have another way of doing away with gun ownership? Because it literally will never go away as long as the 2nd says fuck off.

bearkat42 said:

#Privilege

Click to expand...

hashtagdontbreakthelawandthelawwontbreakyou

see4 said:

Silencer is a BATF term, so is suppressor; so both are correct.

And you don't need a Class III License, nor an SOT to own a silencer. I should know. I own 4.

And no, that's not how you get full auto.

Click to expand...

i stand corrected. well played, sir!

Lord Kanti said:

Shove them all into your ass for safe keeping. Then America can finally be at peace. It's the only way to be sure.

Click to expand...

Girls comment on how nice an ass I have. I'd hate to ruin it by shoving things up there. Though I hear anal beads are all the rage these days.

Yes you are right suppressor See4 that is the price i got from buddy who is licensed FFL an its coming UPS lol i show you the box when it arrives he is placing orders in shortly but said i am getting it at his cost "_" he said he is lossing 700 bucks out of the deal i told him you will make it up with the mods i put on it the fucking ACOG optic sights cost more then the fucking gun unbelievable

ZaraBeth420 said:

I agree that upping checks is not the total answer. It may be only a small part of the answer, if that. The truth is, I don't know.

But it seems reasonable.

Click to expand...

That is good.
That is very, very good.
But "seems" is a world away from established fact.
All our lives we struggle with the disconnect between SHOULD and WHAT IT fkn IS.

And to oppose it seems unreasonable.

Click to expand...

Once the above disconnect is seen, no.
Opposing it now seems prudent.
Never accept someone else's evaluation of Right and Wrong without thinking about it yourself.

What do you think we should do in response to all the shootings? What would cannabineer's plan be to reduce them?

Click to expand...

This is a good question and has nothing at all to do with the above spin control effort.
My plan is to enable the Second Amendment as it was originally written.

A well-regulated militia being necessary to a free State, the rights of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Glossary.
well-regulated: able to hit the target.
militia: Those who can be called up for soldier duty
People: us. Individuals. Not corporations or the State.
Keep and bear: Own. Purchase. Operate. Maintain. Get ammo for. Sell. Bequeath without restriction.
Arms: Weapons. Any and all, from a chipped rock or the Death Star.
Infringed: fucked with in any way.

Terms disambiguated ... any questions?

cannabineer said:

That is good.
That is very, very good.
But "seems" is a world away from established fact.
All our lives we struggle with the disconnect between SHOULD and WHAT IT fkn IS.

Once the above disconnect is seen, no.
Opposing it now seems prudent.
Never accept someone else's evaluation of Right and Wrong without thinking about it yourself.

This is a good question and has nothing at all to do with the above spin control effort.
My plan is to enable the Second Amendment as it was originally written.

A well-regulated militia being necessary to a free State, the rights of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Glossary.
well-regulated: able to hit the target.
militia: Those who can be called up for soldier duty
People: us. Individuals. Not corporations or the State.
Keep and bear: Own. Purchase. Operate. Maintain. Get ammo for. Sell. Bequeath without restriction.
Arms: Weapons. Any and all, from a chipped rock or the Death Star.
Infringed: fucked with in any way.

Terms disambiguated ... any questions?

Click to expand...

This seems to be covered by the 2nd Ammendment.
Own. Purchase. Operate. Maintain. Get ammo for.

This does not seem to be covered.
Sell. Bequeath.

ZaraBeth420 said:

This seems to be covered by the 2nd Ammendment.
Own. Purchase. Operate. Maintain. Get ammo for.

This does not seem to be covered.
Sell. Bequeath.

Click to expand...

Your seems are showing. In Politics, go commando or go home.

see4 said:

Cool chart. Except it in no way draws a direct correlation between the two.

It is not, as if to say, "because more guns, therefore less crime rates".

Click to expand...

You are the one claiming a correlation. You said more guns yields more "gun violence". The data from DOJ obviously refutes that silly claim.

It could be that more guns yields less violence, as the chart implies, or the two could be completely unrelated. What the chart does prove, however, is that the assertion that "more guns leads to more violence" is hokum.

Facts matter.

cannabineer said:

Your seems are showing. In Politics, go commando or go home.

Click to expand...

Yeah I've seen a lot of commando posts here for sure. Not yours, but a lot from others. I'm just not a commando tho.

I come from a gun family and have had fun shooting myself growing up. I shot a 22 rifle with my dad lotsa times. Most my bf's have been into hunting or target shooting. Guns are not evil I know. But I think it's a new situation with all the shootings and I think some changes have to be made in keeping so many crazies from getting them so easy.