noham
Active Member
About what the hell were they doing if not comparing it to untouched plants? What else would define it a success, a working method, than having an improved yield COMPARED to what's produced with "regular" plant care.My feeling for the pro studies is that there are many influences on plant growth and if controlled side by side comparisons are not done then the results are inconclusive. As MJ growers in the Pro studies had not compared their defoliated plants to non defoliated plants (and I looked long and hard to find experiments that included both) there can't be any real basis for saying defoliation works however the interesting studies done on food crops makes me curious because their studies included both defoliated and non defoliated plants. Decide for yourself.
What possibly was the point?
Other than that, the flower pictures in the Pro thread are quite awesome...