Capitalism is about who controls the means of production. Either the private individual does or the government does in some form or another.It is because some people think Capitalism is about money and it is not,
Capitalism is about trustworthiness, credit, social standing and the ability to REPAY DEBT.
yes, I'm as opposed to nationalization as I am to privatizationAC,
Are you a proponent of anarcho-syndicalism? I forgot what type of socialism you were in favour of.
I forgot the question already but this is always an acceptable answer.The best answer to the OP is this:
"...No, Mr. Bond... i expect you to die!"
the system is rigged and EVERYONE is getting the shaft..however, the righties can humpf, humpf all they want..they have the much better deal.Capitalism isnt broken, you just see it as unfair.
I see socialism as unfair.
We agree to disagree.
Same here.The best answer to the OP is this:
No
The best answer to the OP is this:
"...No, Mr. Bond... i expect you to die!"
Ahh...okay. Then your prior logic makes sense.yes, I'm as opposed to nationalization as I am to privatization
Did you just "who will build the roads?" me?Ahh...okay. Then your prior logic makes sense.
Perhaps this a reflection of my ignorance but I don't understand how society properly functions under such a system without some manner of democratic decision making on a large scale (e.g. Internet-Democracy, at least).
Do you seriously envision a world of COOPs being able to manage all those details we take for granted, like roads, water, etc. ?
Where does the concept of public goods fit into your schema? Is there a judicial system, and how is it managed?
Absolutely.Did you just "who will build the roads?" me?
No.Absolutely.
Seriously...help me understand the larger infrastructure of an anarcho-syndcalist society, please.
Oh I've read some publications on anarcho-syndicalism, but is there perhaps one or two sources of info you could recommend which may address the concern I raise?No.
There are plenty of sources for information on anarchosyndicalism. I will only go so far as to say that I am an anarchosyndicalist, it goes against my views to push my views. I sure love criticizing capitalism though.
you're a dumb piece of shit.Why does that statement have you rolling around on the floor laughing? I have marketable skills, I can choose who I work for, I can go to the highest bidder if that's my mission or I can contract my work and work when I want. If I wanted real money I could franchise but the hours suck. The biggest pain and largest hurdles to overcome are government regulations that require x,y and z first before I can do all of this, and a,b and c while I'm doing this.
Your socialism is actually an impediment to my way of life. Why is yours more important than mine? How bout we leave each other alone and help out who we want?
People can opt out of jobs, they can't opt out of socialism if that's the rule of the land. My way depends on me and mine and has nothing to do with you and yours. Your way can't exist without other people doing the work for you.
I started with Chomsky, On Anarchism piqued my interest in anarchosyndicalism particularly. Anything by Malatesta is good. Conquest of Bread by Kropotkin is good. Alexander Berkman is good.Oh I've read some publications on anarcho-syndicalism, but is there perhaps one or two sources of info you could recommend which may address the concern I raise?
Surely there must have been something in particular which drove you to embrace the ideology.
I found Rocker's book (with the Chomsky preface)...that's precisely the type of work I was looking for.If you just want a concise work specifically about Anarchosyndicalism, the primary source is Rudolph Rocker. Anarcho-Syndicalism: Theory & Practice, complete with criticism of Marx and with the Spanish revolution as a real life model for the study is going to be the best bet.
It is because some people think Capitalism is about money and it is not,
Capitalism is about trustworthiness, credit, social standing and the ability to REPAY DEBT.
Help! I'm being repressed!You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. ..... A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--
I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.
But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs,-- --but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more--
Listen -- strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
Well you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!
I mean, if I went around sayin' I was an emperor just because some moistened bink had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!