Impeach the so called President?

Should President Barack Obama II be impeached for treason?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 57.4%
  • No

    Votes: 16 34.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 4 8.5%

  • Total voters
    47

Doer

Well-Known Member
Yes impeached and imprisoned if not publicly hung from the top of the Washington monument.
left to rot for months until his body decays and all his bones fall and collect at the bottom of the monument making for perfect doggy chew toys.
Yes, the good old days....when Britannia ruled the Seas.
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Has fb360 always been a retard?

Complaining that a president doesn't uphold the constitution when he himself doesn't even know what is IN the constitution.
 

LadyZandra

Active Member
the "warning prior to 9-11" were the sort of inane threats the US had been receiving for decades from sandland. clinton also received those same dire predictions and did nothing about them. Edit: and rightly so, since the CIA and NSA had been saying for decades that a plot was afoot, and then saying "but dont worry, we got this shit" or "but they cant do shit to us from all the way over there". nobody saw 9-11 coming, since the threatrs have been NON STOP and (almost) 100% baseless puffery for 50 years.

the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" were NOT a pretext. check your Wikileaks for more information on mustard saran and VX filled artillery shells, chemical sprayers with saran residue, loaded scuds hidden in junkyards, and jets buried in the desert all found after 10 years of Hans Blix's searches. even Hans Blix's report which has been widely characterized as saying "There aint shit in iraq" actually says "We didnt find shit in iraq but we werent allowed to look in any of the places we think the shit was hidden"

the "multiple wars" are pure bullshit. one of them was ONGOING since 1989, since we only had a cease fire with iraq (same with north korea since the 50's BTW) and saddam didnt abide by one single stipulation of that treaty for even one day. in reality the cease fire shouldnt have lasted a afternoon, much less ten years of bush 1 and clinton's waffling. the war with afghanistan was richly deserved, and was only concurrent with iraq, because clinton and bush1 failed to do their fucking jobs.

the "surplus" never existed, it was a fiction based on long term projections that assumed the internet bubble would never burst. thats why despite the "surplus" the national debt still kept climbing . if you have a "surplus" you do not have to add to the debt since you can use the "surplus" to pay for shit interest free.

the "Economic Hole" has been 60 years in the digging, and cannot be blamed on any one party or any one person. but we can say, that Barrack is the hardest working man the Hole Factory has seen for 60 years, and he digs like he was born with a shovel in his hand. in his 5 years at the coal face, obama has moved us much deeper into the earth than all the previous diggers combined, including reagan and carter who were both a mean hand with a pick and shovel themselves. if you really want to stop the hole from getting any deeper, then i suggest giving obama some time off. hes a fiscal John Henry, laying down more debt than even the most powerful steam driven debt machine can.


ohh yeah, and obama's black too. thats the only reason im not a Barrack Booster.
Thats also why im such a HUGE FAN of jimmy carter, cuz he's not black, and why i think clinton is so great, because he too is like totally not black.
woodrow wilson is the best president EVER because he is so not black.

Warren G Harding, yeah he sucks, because he is in fact an Octoroon.

ohh wait, i hate clinton wilson and carter and LIKE Harding! wow, there went that theory,
Thank You for so openly proving my point that most of these arguments are based on what Conspiracy-believers and political "baiters" WANT to believe and try to FORCE others to agree with instead of holding intelligent and CALM conversations....REGARDLESS of whether you are Right-wing, left-wing, Centrist, Separatists etc....

I referred to BOTH sides as being "over the top"... becaue the people bitching about BUSH were just as bad as those now bitching about OBAMA...

has there EVER been a President some people didn't hate?
Any Presidency where there wasn't SOME controversy, conspiracy theories etc???

My "Obama Being Black" reference and the "John McCain" reference were aimed at those who already made these references earlier in this dialogue.. (He's a Muslim, not a real American Citizen etc..)

Did I hit a nerve- or you just so wound up that you'll "poke a stick" at anyone and everyone you don't agree with or don't understand??

I am intelligent enough to see both sides, read the 'facts" that are available from ALL sides of the argument and make my own decisions.... non-partisan, split ticket-- I vote my beliefs, views and conscious.... I don't just check "Vote All Republican/Democrat" and walk away -- and even if I VOTED for a certain Senator, Governor, President- doesn't mean I'll back him.her up no matter what they do/don't do after elected!

Again-- too many people are sheeple-- and I refuse to be 'herded' by conspiracy theorists, doomsayers, bigots and haters.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Has fb360 always been a retard?

Complaining that a president doesn't uphold the constitution when he himself doesn't even know what is IN the constitution.
not sure about the retard stuff, but he almost always leaves himself in an imminently trollable position.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
gonna have to disagree with the smirk police here.

that comes up on a simple google search for romney smirk. hell, i present to you exhibit B:



this is just another example of why you shouldn't try to push your definitions as the one and only definition, empirical evidence be damned.

that's why your hatred for "multiculturalism" is so retarded and out of touch with reality. just because you have concocted in your own silly, bircher mind a definition for multiculturalism that leads us to a "singular mindset" does not grant your definition any basis in reality whatsoever.

if things worked in the manner in which you seem to think they work, i could just define my lawn as cannabis and get rich selling my lawnmower clippings. but alas, grass does not have any THC, just as multiculturalism is not secret commie code speak for hitler children of a singular mindset, no matter how much you try to insist it is.

that is just your bircher delusion, and your logically retarded modus operandi.
[h=3]smirk[/h]/smərk/
Verb

Smile in an irritatingly smug, conceited, or silly way.

Noun
A smug, conceited, or silly smile: "a self-satisfied smirk".





no matter how it gets tagged by google, romney's pedosmile does not convey superiority or smugness, and definitely not silliness.

if you showed that image to a group of people who had NO IDEA who he is, and asked "what do you think is on this man's mind" i betcha 2/3 of the respondents would say "Sex."

romney's grin fairly screams "You Want Some Candy?" not "I'm better than you"

the obama smirk is the very definition of smug superiority


Romney's was just creepy and a little frightening.

 

Doer

Well-Known Member
not sure about the retard stuff, but he almost always leaves himself in an imminently trollable position.
Ruh Roh....how many Demerits is that?

Or, are playing with Humilitrons, this time, or is it Himbareass tokens, again.
 

LadyZandra

Active Member
Again-- tryingtogrow89 proving the point that when people are not intelligent enough to hold a calm adult conversation concerning a subject they THINK they understand with other people who have conflicting views reduce themselves to infantile name-calling and degrading....

welcome back to 5th grade folks....
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
Again-- tryingtogrow89 proving the point that when people are not intelligent enough to hold a calm adult conversation concerning a subject they THINK they understand with other people who have conflicting views reduce themselves to infantile name-calling and degrading....

welcome back to 5th grade folks....
Well shows how well you comprehend ANYTHING!
He started with a personal attack, and i can't keep it adult because i had differing views?
I am pretty sure i threw in my opinion on this thread and buck took right off with a personal attack because of my opinoin.

lol don't make me laugh.
Sorry no time for your stupidity...
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Again-- tryingtogrow89 proving the point that when people are not intelligent enough to hold a calm adult conversation concerning a subject they THINK they understand with other people who have conflicting views reduce themselves to infantile name-calling and degrading....

welcome back to 5th grade folks....
You must be new here, infantile name calling is what the politics section is all about.

Sincerely,

Desert Douche, AKA Desert Rat, AKA Dastardly Dan...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
smirk

/smərk/
Verb

Smile in an irritatingly smug, conceited, or silly way.
Noun
A smug, conceited, or silly smile: "a self-satisfied smirk".





no matter how it gets tagged by google, romney's pedosmile does not convey superiority or smugness, and definitely not silliness.

if you showed that image to a group of people who had NO IDEA who he is, and asked "what do you think is on this man's mind" i betcha 2/3 of the respondents would say "Sex."

romney's grin fairly screams "You Want Some Candy?" not "I'm better than you"

the obama smirk is the very definition of smug superiority


Romney's was just creepy and a little frightening.
still gonna have to disagree, but luckily this one is subjective, so we can actually do that here neither one of our worldviews is destroyed.

still wish you would just come out and say uppity.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well shows how well you comprehend ANYTHING!
He started with a personal attack, and i can't keep it adult because i had differing views?
I am pretty sure i threw in my opinion on this thread and buck took right off with a personal attack because of my opinoin.

lol don't make me laugh.
Sorry no time for your stupidity...
dude, i've been waiting a while to let you know how maniacally i laughed at those pics.

you could have waltzed into the politics section and mentioned that you love obama nd boobs are great and i would have done the same.
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
i saw the pics you posted of yourself in the other thread and did all i could not to express my maniacal laughter in that thread itself. thought it would be more polite if i waited to do it here.

i'm gonna have to go ahead and guess that your daddy abandoned you or mistreated you something fierce. am i about right on that one?
Also you must be utterly obsessed with me, i have not posted pictures for weeks, you are a stalker freak!
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
dude, i've been waiting a while to let you know how maniacally i laughed at those pics.

you could have waltzed into the politics section and mentioned that you love obama nd boobs are great and i would have done the same.
Sounds like you have some in the closet homosexuality.
An image of a guy should not make someone so insecure as you are displaying.
My appearance sure has your panties in a bunch.
 

LadyZandra

Active Member
Jeeze dude-- (tryingtogrow89) You just can't help yourself can you? You just prove my point over and over and over..... regardless of your views- it is your childish demeanor that shows your ignorance- regardless of who or what you believe in.... no one even KNOWS your point anymore, because you have basically erased it through all the baiting & name-calling....

say what you want hun.... I know where I stand, what I believe in, and I am confident enough to not have to resort to the "fatty- stinky-ugly" childish remarks..

at least TRY get back to the subject at hand sonny-- or fuck off! You are hijacking a political thread for your own childish pissing contest.

You do KNOW who Obama, Bush, Clinton and Bush Senior are-- yes??? Good!
Do you know what the Constitution is- and understand at least part of it? Good!
Do you have the ability to make informed decisions on political subjects and discuss them with other adults without taking it as a personal attack that you feel just must be escalated and turned into a schoolyard "Your Mamma" pissing match.......???

well........????
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Thank You for so openly proving my point that most of these arguments are based on what Conspiracy-believers and political "baiters" WANT to believe and try to FORCE others to agree with instead of holding intelligent and CALM conversations....REGARDLESS of whether you are Right-wing, left-wing, Centrist, Separatists etc....

I referred to BOTH sides as being "over the top"... becaue the people bitching about BUSH were just as bad as those now bitching about OBAMA...

has there EVER been a President some people didn't hate?
Any Presidency where there wasn't SOME controversy, conspiracy theories etc???

My "Obama Being Black" reference and the "John McCain" reference were aimed at those who already made these references earlier in this dialogue.. (He's a Muslim, not a real American Citizen etc..)

Did I hit a nerve- or you just so wound up that you'll "poke a stick" at anyone and everyone you don't agree with or don't understand??

I am intelligent enough to see both sides, read the 'facts" that are available from ALL sides of the argument and make my own decisions.... non-partisan, split ticket-- I vote my beliefs, views and conscious.... I don't just check "Vote All Republican/Democrat" and walk away -- and even if I VOTED for a certain Senator, Governor, President- doesn't mean I'll back him.her up no matter what they do/don't do after elected!

Again-- too many people are sheeple-- and I refuse to be 'herded' by conspiracy theorists, doomsayers, bigots and haters.
so, instead of disputing my arguments point by point, you simply declare moral victory and assert that im a sheep for actually knowing what went on in the gulf war and it's interminable afterbirth?

how very mature, unbiased and non-sheep like you are.

i have no intention of FORCING you to agree with shit. you however cannot make broad sweeping and categorically incorrect statements then pretend that the truth is irrelevant, or in this case, the truth despite being counter to your claims, actually PROVES YOU WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG...

what you mean is you FEEL certain ways, and you have the right to FEEL that way, and the facts are irrelevant to your FEELINGS, and im a meanie for bringing up facts when youre busy FEELING WAYS ABOUT THINGS.


sadly however, your FEELINGS are irrelevant to the facts, and as much as you might like to assert that Obama's not so bad, because the last guy sucked too, that doesnt change the simple fact that the CURRENT GUY SUCKS, and until you invent a Feelings Powered Time Machine the last guy's suckiness is still pretty much locked in. all we can hope to do is keep the CURRENT guy, and future guys from sucking as badly.

endlessly insisting that as much as the current guy sucks, he is only slightly more sucky than the last guy so thats OK, only creates an endles cycle of suck, very much like the federal reserve has done with inflation, so your dollar ONLY loses 1.5-3% of it';s value every year, and thats not so bad cuz it could be worse... your dollar is still 1.5-3% less than it was last year and will continue to circle the drain until it achieves singularity and implodes becoming worse than valueless and you have to pay people to haul away your money.

now is the time to draw the line, to stand up and shout "The Line Must Be Drawn, This shitty, No Shittier!" and refuse to allow any further slouching into ignominy for the office of the president.

our presidents have been progressively smaller men since the start of the 20th century, each one less powerful in his personality, and less representative of the american character. likewise their policies have been less founded on our constitution and more geared towards appeasing the bureaucracy. even reagan who was uncommonly charismatic, and carter who was uncommonly honest were not the men that Theodore Roosevelt or Warren Harding were. the treend reached it's nadir with bush 1's limp wristed response to numerous affronts which so emboldened saddam that he just assumed he could do as he wished, to clinton's personal failures and even MORE limp wristed responses to saddams actions.

obama may be an inveterate liar, a chicago style politician and entirely unqualified for the office of the president, but at least he's not an embarrassment to the nation like bush1 and clinton.
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
Jeeze dude-- (tryingtogrow89) You just can't help yourself can you? You just prove my point over and over and over..... regardless of your views- it is your childish demeanor that shows your ignorance- regardless of who or what you believe in.... no one even KNOWS your point anymore, because you have basically erased it through all the baiting & name-calling....

say what you want hun.... I know where I stand, what I believe in, and I am confident enough to not have to resort to the "fatty- stinky-ugly" childish remarks..

at least TRY get back to the subject at hand sonny-- or fuck off! You are hijacking a political thread for your own childish pissing contest.

You do KNOW who Obama, Bush, Clinton and Bush Senior are-- yes??? Good!
Do you know what the Constitution is- and understand at least part of it? Good!
Do you have the ability to make informed decisions on political subjects and discuss them with other adults without taking it as a personal attack that you feel just must be escalated and turned into a schoolyard "Your Mamma" pissing match.......???

well........????
A. I am cynical
B. A nihilist
C. What you have to say, has nothing to do with anything.
D. You are in your own world
 
Top