Iran Update...

medicineman

New Member
Did you folks catch the Obama speech to the Iranian ppl and their "leaders"? It was a hoot!! Cropped flags and all. That sure is going to change their minds!! :mrgreen:

Iran just basically laughed at him....they smell a wet dog infidel!


out. :blsmoke:
Hey cracker, your side lost, get over it.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Why is it that you can clearly see any mistake made by democrats, but when it comes to a conservative or republican, anytime anyone brings up anything they fucked up on, you either deny it or try to justify it in some completely ridiculous way? Do you think republicans and conservatives don't screw up in our government? Are you at least aware of you're insane amount of bias towards the right? Everything you post condemns the left and sides with the right, seemingly, no matter what. Is there any example you can give me where you would side with the left in any situation over the right?

This is one of the major points I've been talking about this entire thread, if you go into the game with the mindset of "our team is better than your team", your judgment on issues becomes extremely clouded, all you ever want is your team to win, so you couldn't give a damn about the actual issue. This is a HUGE problem you have CJ. I would seriously suggest you work on it, it's clear to everyone whose read this thread.

...Me on the other hand, I don't give a damn who says what, if somethings stupid, I'm calling whoever said it out on it, right, left, doesn't mean shit to me. Republicans can come up with good ideas just like democrats can, in contrast, they can BOTH come up with some pretty fuckin' shitty ideas. That's the power of the two party system. Get the fuck over thinking your team is always right, ALWAYS, no matter what, because nobody is always right about everything and the more you follow either side without a sense of skepticism, the easier it is for them to keep abusing their power and steal more of our money. It's not right vs left, it's not me vs you, it's US vs THEM! You and I are on the same team CJ, whether you like it or not, how about you start playing on our team?

Bush did fight terrorism, he did win. he recognized it for what it was, exposed it to the light, gave them shock and awe, and sent them scurrying from the central front to hide in the caves of Afghanistan. Now thanks to his policies, we are even now smoking them out, until Obama drops the ball that is.
If he won, why is there still terrorism? Like I said before, and if you'd like, I can easily get you some statistics (but we both know you won't believe them), the only thing Bush did regarding terrorism is ensure there's more of it for future generations. He didn't defeat it, he didn't suppress it, he didn't stop it, it's still going strong, and getting stronger, you CANNOT eliminate terrorism, it is IMPOSSIBLE.

Yes Sue, Paddy only likes evidence which supports his position. That is where we differ. I don't formulate my position until i have gone over the data.
Speak for yourself, asshole.

Side Note - I seriously doubt you're an atheist.

Paddy is probly some piece of shit sitting in his college(liberal indoctrination) class learning about how horrible the US is and believing every bit of it. GO FUCKING JOIN THE ARMY BEFORE YOU TALK SHIT ABOUT THE BOND FORMED WHEN YOU ARE SITTING THERE NIGHT AFTER NIGHT WATCHING SHIT FIRST HAND!! Fuck you faggot, and yess i DID enjoy offing those fucktards, every fucking one because i know that for every one of them i killed i saved countless innocent Iraqis and American soldiers. I was a 240B gunner the first time and SDM the second, i probly killed more people than you have sitting in your American History class, and i say good. Good that there are people like me out there not afraid to get a little blood on their hands to defend people like you and your right to spew that bullshit. At month 5 of my second tour my wife sent me and my AG/spotter each a new K-BAR, in the last 4 months before i got hurt i put 17 notches on its' backstrap, one for every confirmed shot. How many K-BARs do you think i would have needed if i kept count my whole time paddy?
Keep talking shit about our soldiers and see what happens when they stop caring about you.
So college is 'liberal indoctrination' now? Did you ever stop to think that maybe, just maybe the reason so many universities, including top Ivy League institutions, MIT, Harvard, Princeton, etc.. are liberal is because people teaching at those universities, ya know, doctors... generally smart people (much smarter than you and me) have sat down and thought through all the bullshit this American government has produced the past few decades and realized that's probably not the best way to be doing things...

You're essentially proud of being an idiot when you slander 'liberal' like it's a negative term, look up the definition of 'liberal' and don't be surprised by how many ideologies you agree with. Individual rights, equal opportunities... You like that stuff right? Dang, you might be a liberal!!

There's a big difference between realizing that your country is not perfect and believing everything negative ever said about it is true. You and CJ on the other hand believe this country has never done one damn thing that was wrong. So whose being the hypocrites now? Somehow if I believed the country is evil and everything America has ever done was wrong (which I don't), that makes me a liberal (because you both clearly don't understand the definition of the word), but then when you guys believe the country is great and everything America has ever done was right (which you DO!), that makes you patriotic Americans... Give me a fuckin' break...

That's the beauty of living in this country, I can talk any amount of shit I want without any requirements, get the fuck used to it pal. Exactly how religious nuts deserve to be criticized, so do you, there's absolutely nothing you can do about it.

No, you THINK you saved Iraqi's and American soldiers, you don't know shit. Big difference. You're superiors told you killing the 'terrorists' or 'insurgents' would save American soldiers and Iraqi's, that doesn't mean you did. You can consider yourself a hero all you want, but to me and millions of other people around the world, you're a coward with superior weapons, fighting an enemy with a lot more determination than you have, personally, I'd probably throw in - whose also mentally disturbed, as you say you liked killing people. You should be glad there is no God, otherwise your ass would have a lot to answer to on judgment day...

If you take anything away from this interaction, make sure it's this next thing I'm going to say. You're not defending SHIT, you're not protecting SHIT. What you're doing is INVADING, OPPRESSING, and LYING. Did I ask you and the rest of the American military to go fight for me in the middle east? No. I would feel MUCH SAFER if the invasion never took place, the only thing you and your idiot coworkers did is produce more terrorists, get that through your fucking head.

You're not protecting my rights, you're not spreading democracy, I have no obligation to ever thank any of you for shit, all you did was make the world a worse place than it was, congratulations, if that makes a psycho like yourself feel proud, so be it, but you'll NEVER get a thank you out of me.

The soldiers clearly don't care about the American people, if they did they would realize this shit is beyond morally wrong and actually listen to what millions of us are actually saying, instead the only thing they care about is one mans opinion.

Some foreign policy. Now go back to falling in line and follow your leader with unquestioned loyalty.
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
Aid? Where were the Masses of troops? Where were the Billions of Dollars of Military Hardware? I don't think your argument really holds up.

I'll be talking a lot before May 5th, Nice pictures by the way, I wonder how the Islamic society of Nottingham would feel about them?
I thought you would like em;-)
Hell, im sure most of the real muslims who have/can read the koran would agree that these terrorist fucks are a disgrace and would be right along with me. Maybe you should look up the demographics for muslims in america by % then the muslims in the military by %, you might be surprised.
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
Why is it that you can clearly see any mistake made by democrats, but when it comes to a conservative or republican, anytime anyone brings up anything they fucked up on, you either deny it or try to justify it in some completely ridiculous way? Do you think republicans and conservatives don't screw up in our government? Are you at least aware of you're insane amount of bias towards the right? Everything you post condemns the left and sides with the right, seemingly, no matter what. Is there any example you can give me where you would side with the left in any situation over the right?

This is one of the major points I've been talking about this entire thread, if you go into the game with the mindset of "our team is better than your team", your judgment on issues becomes extremely clouded, all you ever want is your team to win, so you couldn't give a damn about the actual issue. This is a HUGE problem you have CJ. I would seriously suggest you work on it, it's clear to everyone whose read this thread.

...Me on the other hand, I don't give a damn who says what, if somethings stupid, I'm calling whoever said it out on it, right, left, doesn't mean shit to me. Republicans can come up with good ideas just like democrats can, in contrast, they can BOTH come up with some pretty fuckin' shitty ideas. That's the power of the two party system. Get the fuck over thinking your team is always right, ALWAYS, no matter what, because nobody is always right about everything and the more you follow either side without a sense of skepticism, the easier it is for them to keep abusing their power and steal more of our money. It's not right vs left, it's not me vs you, it's US vs THEM! You and I are on the same team CJ, whether you like it or not, how about you start playing on our team?



If he won, why is there still terrorism? Like I said before, and if you'd like, I can easily get you some statistics (but we both know you won't believe them), the only thing Bush did regarding terrorism is ensure there's more of it for future generations. He didn't defeat it, he didn't suppress it, he didn't stop it, it's still going strong, and getting stronger, you CANNOT eliminate terrorism, it is IMPOSSIBLE.



Speak for yourself, asshole.

Side Note - I seriously doubt you're an atheist.



So college is 'liberal indoctrination' now?
No, you THINK you saved Iraqi's and American soldiers, you don't know shit. Big difference. You're superiors told you killing the 'terrorists' or 'insurgents' would save American soldiers and Iraqi's, that doesn't mean you did. You can consider yourself a hero all you want, but to me and millions of other people around the world, you're a coward with superior weapons, fighting an enemy with a lot more determination than you have, personally, I'd probably throw in - whose also mentally disturbed, as you say you liked killing people. You should be glad there is no God, otherwise your ass would have a lot to answer to on judgment day...

If you take anything away from this interaction, make sure it's this next thing I'm going to say. You're not defending SHIT, you're not protecting SHIT. What you're doing is INVADING, OPPRESSING, and LYING. Did I ask you and the rest of the American military to go fight for me in the middle east? No. I would feel MUCH SAFER if the invasion never took place, the only thing you and your idiot coworkers did is produce more terrorists, get that through your fucking head.

You're not protecting my rights, you're not spreading democracy, I have no obligation to ever thank any of you for shit, all you did was make the world a worse place than it was, congratulations, if that makes a psycho like yourself feel proud, so be it, but you'll NEVER get a thank you out of me.

The soldiers clearly don't care about the American people, if they did they would realize this shit is beyond morally wrong and actually listen to what millions of us actually said, instead the only thing they care about is one mans opinion.

Some foreign policy. Now go back to falling in line and follow your leader with unquestioned loyalty.
Maybe you shoul dlook at the definition of a liberal and see where it is now... the democrats of the 60'-80's are the republicans now. As a conservative not only do i NOT think our government is perfect, infact its quite the oposite which is why I(conservatives) want less and smaller government, I think if you really read up you would be a conservative. The liberals/democrats are no longer democrats, they are the socialist party just look at their mandates.

As for colleges being places of indoctrine, yes they are and its due to a little thing called tenure, the dean gets to decide who he wants to offer tenure too(someone who criticizes his ideologies or another lib?) then once in a proffessor can almost not be fired.

And no i dont think i saved people because others told me so i KNOW i saved people because which is more, the 1 suicide bomber and maybe a few of his buddies or the 180 civilians dead plus another couple hundred injured??? You really need to read statistics first buddy. Of all of the bombings that have happend in this war aprox 5500 soldiers have been killed, aprox 19,000 insurgents, and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians(including only those killed by insurgents) so yes for every insurgent we smoke, 5.2 inoccents are saved. seems like a fair trade to me.
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
by the way I went to college, I got my bachelors in political science while in the service and am working towards a masters in constitutional law at the moment.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Med man, I have no side. I am neither dem or rep. Can you say the same?

Bush won in Iraq paddy. Why do I have to explain every little detail to you? You seem to be quite a typist and yet empty of content and common sense. :lol:

volume doesn't equal intelligence. We're not writing books here. Although certainly I could.


out. :blsmoke:
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Med man, I have no side. I am neither dem or rep. Can you say the same?

Bush won in Iraq paddy. Why do I have to explain every little detail to you? You seem to be quite a typist and yet empty of content and common sense. :lol:

volume doesn't equal intelligence. We're not writing books here. Although certainly I could.


out. :blsmoke:
I type out everything I need to say in these responses, knowing anyone else reading them wont be confused about any of my positions. You on the other hand keep your posts ambiguous and vague without ever releasing any solid statements, so that when we dissect them and rip them to shreds and show you point by point exactly where you're wrong, you can always fall back on the "oh you must have been confused, that's not what I thought, can't you read?" reaction any self righteous smug American would have, then act like it's our fault for misunderstanding... then you just move on to another zany post that doesn't make any sense to anyone but max and drgreenz, you know, the only people in here who are proud of KILLING other INNOCENT people (don't kid yourself, it's likely not every one of them was a 'terrorist').

So how's it feel? You're the ringleader in opposition to peace and equal opportunity around the world and the only other people in this entire thread who are backing you up are murderers. Clearly your position is the one that's preaching peace and not death, right?

Ignorance and arrogance are bad enough alone, throw in the self righteousness, bias views and talking points, and advocation of war, death and destruction and you have one sad, empty, pointless individual.

This is the part where I question if there's even any hope for you at this point... :neutral:

...and one more thing, you don't post long coherent explanations detailing your opinion because you know I'll be here to RIP it apart, like I always do, and after I do that, you wouldn't have shit to lean on.
 

Woomeister

Well-Known Member
If the kurds were so important to the Americans then why wasnt action instant rather than years and years later. They had no WMD, they wanted to hide the fact they didnt have them so that Iran wouldnt attack them, not to be difficult with the west.
 

Woomeister

Well-Known Member
wow woomeister another SW UK argument jsut like the others, they must really raise you all right out there. The argument wmd's? well im sorry to say but yes Iraq had used wmd's in the past, recall tens of thousands of kurds being killed by syrin gas in the late 90's and early 2000? wtf do you think syring gas inside a missle is?
as for not going into sudan, rwanda ext here
sudan= http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/africa/darfur/origins.html
the first bush did send military aid to the RFP in Rwanda= http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8189
US un ambassador Petoria said "the top US envoy for Africa, Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi Frazer was due to begin a tour of the region from Wednesday" zimbabwe= http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/23/8474
Although the Hutu extremists facilitated their onslaught of power upon the Tutsi, the countries that watched this horrific tragedy unfold also played a key role in the savagery of this genocide. They stood by silently while more than a million people were brutally murdered. The United States sought to play down this affair by instructing its officials to use the phrase, “acts of genocide,” rather than acknowledging that a deliberate policy of genocide was being implemented. “The alleged reason for this word-play was the US government feared that acknowledging this would oblige it to undertake more vigorous action under the UN’s Convention on Genocide” (Vassal 43). David Rawson, U.S. ambassador to Rwanda, for example, stated that “as a responsible government, you don’t just go around hollering ‘genocide.’ You say that acts of genocide may have occurred and they need to be investigated.” The administration equivocated from implementing this identification from May until mid-June, when congressional outrage and a rash of critical articles in the press forced Secretary of State Warren Christopher to finally invoke the term (Douglas).

After the genocide had escalated, and foreign intervention was vital, President Clinton agreed to sign a document entitled PDD 25, Presidential Decision Directive. This document aims to limit U.S. military involvement in international peacekeeping operations, not only in Rwanda, but also in peacekeeping affairs worldwide (Triumph). Decision Directive 25 (PDD 25) required that for U.S. participation, A U.N. mission must be a response to threats to international peace and security, must advance American interests at acceptable risk, and must have adequate command and control procedures and an exit strategy” (Burkhalter 20). The directive was in marked contrast to Bill Clinton’s campaign vision of U.N. operations.

During the 1992 presidential campaign, candidate Clinton expressed strong support for international operations to shield threatened countries from foreign invasion, to provide humanitarian assistance and protection for civilians in civil war, and to combat terrorism and drug trafficking. Indeed, Clinton even called for development of a U.N. “rapid deployment” force to respond quickly to such situations. Yet after 16 months in office, Clinton’s plan was the embodiment of what Rep. David Obey (D-WI) called the American people’s hope for “zero degree of involvement and zero degree of risk and zero degree of pain and confusion (Wolf ). Clinton used this word play as a medium through which he can emphasize his interest in foreign affairs and conflicts. However in 1992, he forgot to mention that he is only interested in affairs that serve a domestic importance to the United States. This human rights disaster, according to Clinton, does not classify.

Over the following weeks and months, U.S. parsimony and insistence on the utmost caution impeded the dispatch of UN troops to Rwanda. In fact, all the troops involved were African, and the U.S. financial commitment amounted merely to a contribution to the UN peacekeeping budget. In the first place, the U.S. refusal to commit its own troops to the effort reduced the prestige of the mission and discouraged troop-contributing nations who would have been eager to join an American-led effort (Burkhalter 26). This action of the U.S. revealed their inertia towards the disaster. They stood passively behind the scenes donating a small monetary supplement to the cause, instead of aggressively using force to end the disaster quickly.

By Mid-May, when the genocide had reached a climax, the United States further displayed its passivity by stalling on its commitment to provide equipment for the force. Troops were theoretically available from Ghana, Senegal, Ethiopia, and other nations. But only the rich countries had the resources to equip them, and the process of settling on appropriate equipment, and on what the United States would pay, took months. According to congressional staff, Ghana’s “outrageous” request included demands for tanks, helicopters, and howitzers (Burkhalter 31). The American response was to quarrel over costs with the U.N. bureaucracy and to stall in making military items available.

A mission involving a rescue and a total termination of genocidal activities had been constructed, but needed the assistance of 50 armored vehicles. On May 19, 1994, the UN asked for the compliance by the US, but there were arguments over the costs of such measures and the rescue mission had been delayed once again (Triumph). The Pentagon and the United Nations reportedly negotiated for weeks over such details as whether to buy tank-like (tracked) or wheeled vehicles, and whether the United Nations should buy or lease the vehicles. Even when the negotiations were in the final phase, the administration had “taken no steps to refurbish...or move the APCs from their bases in Germany” because “Pentagon regulations stipulate that no steps to carry out a contract can be taken until a lease is signed, and the White House never pressed to waive the restrictions (Gordon ). Over a million lives were taken as the United States debated expenditures that may have ultimately ended the genocide. Long live American foreign policy, consistent, righteous and...........errrmmm BULLSHIT!!!!
 

Jointsmith

Well-Known Member
I thought you would like em;-)
Hell, im sure most of the real muslims who have/can read the koran would agree that these terrorist fucks are a disgrace and would be right along with me. Maybe you should look up the demographics for muslims in america by % then the muslims in the military by %, you might be surprised.
Good then, you won't mind posting your room number so we can come and 'thank you' appropriately.

by the way I went to college, I got my bachelors in political science while in the service and am working towards a masters in constitutional law at the moment.
BWAHAHA!!! An American College 'Education' in the service. you must be very proud lol.

I'm sure you learned a lot about unbiased critical analysis of information, lolololol.

(The US Education system is a Joke, do you even know your world standing? It's like you are BRED to mindlessly believe what you are told....like a good grunt)
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
the US university system is the best in the world.
if people from other countrys can afford to send their children to university in the USA they do it every single time.
our public education system is lacking.\
and the over all test scores are brought way down by inner city youth's
all if the worlds finest minds scientists doctors .ect ect all come to america to work and live?
why is that?
are you aware of how many americans win the nobel prize in science and mathamatics..the only two prizes that count on the nobel commitee,
you seem to be another liberal talking out your ass ..yet again
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
some people are sooo fucking sorry and evil they deserve to die.
the ones who would steal our freedom damn sure deserve it.
 

Jointsmith

Well-Known Member
the US university system is the best in the world.
if people from other countrys can afford to send their children to university in the USA they do it every single time.
our public education system is lacking.\
and the over all test scores are brought way down by inner city youth's
all if the worlds finest minds scientists doctors .ect ect all come to america to work and live?
why is that?
are you aware of how many americans win the nobel prize in science and mathamatics..the only two prizes that count on the nobel commitee,
you seem to be another liberal talking out your ass ..yet again
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! According to WHO!?!

Sorry Max but you're deluding yourself.

The American college system is a Joke, your 'degree's' equate to 'A Levels' in the UK (our equivilent of High School).

What does it even mean to 'Major' in a Subject? in UK universities you spend 3 years intensively studying ONE SUBJECT in order to become an EXPERT in your field. (not study a group of subjects to gain a good general Education, that is done during A Levels Age 16 - 18 usually)
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
if that were the case your surgeons would be the best in the world..and they are not..your DENTISTS would be the best in the world..and they obviosly are not.your engineers would be the best in the world and your scientists..and they are not..
just like everyone else from the Uk all full of yourself and not worth a shit at much of anything but banking anymore. your country used to have some of the finest machinists in the world and engineers in the world.WHAT THE FUCK HAPPEND TO THE UK? what kind of space program does the Uk have? what kind of super collider program to you have? OH YEA.I FORGOT.NONE.
what about bilogical and nano technolegy engineering? chemical engineering ,mechanical engineering ,
you are just full of shit ..i can start naming the best universitys in what ever field you want to name and they are here in the USA.
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
Good then, you won't mind posting your room number so we can come and 'thank you' appropriately.


BWAHAHA!!! An American College 'Education' in the service. you must be very proud lol.

I'm sure you learned a lot about unbiased critical analysis of information, lolololol.

(The US Education system is a Joke, do you even know your world standing? It's like you are BRED to mindlessly believe what you are told....like a good grunt)
as far as the room number goes I already told you i would post it as soon as i get the number ass read all my posts to you.

You do realize that the military urges all of their soldiers to go to school while serving, Over half of my company(103 Grunts) had at least a 2 year degree. They are not military schools either, i went to theuniversity of minnesota, and the University of southern colorado, as well as some online while deployed. So unless you are trying to say that State Colleges are owned by the military your entire point is once again null in void.
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
the US university system is the best in the world.
if people from other countrys can afford to send their children to university in the USA they do it every single time.
our public education system is lacking.\
and the over all test scores are brought way down by inner city youth's
all if the worlds finest minds scientists doctors .ect ect all come to america to work and live?
why is that?
are you aware of how many americans win the nobel prize in science and mathamatics..the only two prizes that count on the nobel commitee,
you seem to be another liberal talking out your ass ..yet again
Besides, the only reason our public school system(k-12) is lacking is because of all the liberalism in dealing with the schools, instead of forcing the teachers to teach and get results, they just throw more and more money at them thanks to the all powerful teachers union.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Besides, the only reason our public school system(k-12) is lacking is because of all the liberalism in dealing with the schools, instead of forcing the teachers to teach and get results, they just throw more and more money at them thanks to the all powerful teachers union.
"Give the schools more money"

"Uh, the schools are still sucking"

"Throw more money at them"

"They're still sucking"

"MORE MONEY!"
 

Woomeister

Well-Known Member
the US university system is the best in the world.
if people from other countrys can afford to send their children to university in the USA they do it every single time.
our public education system is lacking.\
and the over all test scores are brought way down by inner city youth's
all if the worlds finest minds scientists doctors .ect ect all come to america to work and live?
why is that?
are you aware of how many americans win the nobel prize in science and mathamatics..the only two prizes that count on the nobel commitee,
you seem to be another liberal talking out your ass ..yet again
[SIZE=-1] Rank [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]University [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]1[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Harvard University, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]2[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Yale University, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]3[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] University of Cambridge, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]4[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] University of Oxford, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]5[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] California Institute of Technology, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]6[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Imperial College London, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]7[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] University College London, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]8[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] The University of Chicago, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]9[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]10[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Columbia University, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-2] As you are far larger and far more wealthy I believe that makes 6:4 in your favour makes The UK come out on top!![/SIZE]
 

Drgreenz

Well-Known Member
[SIZE=-1] Rank [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]University [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]1[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Harvard University, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]2[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Yale University, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]3[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] University of Cambridge, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]4[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] University of Oxford, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]5[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] California Institute of Technology, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]6[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Imperial College London, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]7[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] University College London, UK [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]8[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] The University of Chicago, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]9[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]10[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Columbia University, USA [/SIZE][SIZE=-2] As you are far larger and far more wealthy I believe that makes 6:4 in your favour makes The UK come out on top!![/SIZE]
LOL UK come out on top? That makes no sense, your colleges have been around for 500 years compered to our 150 with harvard and less than 100 on the others, Your last sentance makes absolutely no sense.... "You have the best universities but because i want to, yours dont really count...."
cmon bro grow up.
 

Woomeister

Well-Known Member
WORLD EDUCATION RANKINGSUNICEF rankings of educational systems in the world's richest countries, indicating the percentage of 14 and 15 year olds scoring below a minimum level in literacy, math and science. 1. South Korea 1.4 percent
2. Japan 2.2
3. Finland 4.4
4. Canada 5
5. Australia 6.2
6. Austria 8.2
7. Britain 9.4
8. Ireland 10.2
9. Sweden 10.8
10. Czech Republic 12.2
- (tie) New Zealand 12.2
12. France 12.6
13. Switzerland 13
14. Belgium 14
- (tie) Iceland 14
16. Hungary 14.2
- (tie) Norway 14.2
18. United States 16.2
19. Germany 17
- (tie) Denmark 17
21. Spain 18.6
22. Italy 20.2
23. Greece 23.2
24. Portugal 23.6


LOL!!!!!!!!!
 
Top