It's All The Fault Of Fox News

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2014

BigNBushy said:
Has Sean Hanity, probably, has Brett bair (sp?), britt Hume, negative.

HUME: That's right. Well, then, the New Deal -- everybody agrees, I think, on both sides of the spectrum now, that the New Deal failed.

wooops, that's a lie.

SirGreenThumb · Feb 4, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
Do you believe the ratings make it the best, most credible, most entertaining show ever produced? Because that's the shit FOX implies when they tout their ratings, in the words of Immortal Technique;

"Technique chemically unstable, set to explodeforetold by the dead sea scrolls written in codes
so if your message ain't shit, fuck the records you sold
'cause if you go platinum, it's got nothing to do with luck
it just means that a million people are stupid as fuck"

-Immortal Technique - Industrial Revolution

Naw, I could care less about their ratings. I just enjoy the humor, hunting and family aspect of the show.

Padawanbater2 said:
Replace "broadcast" with "produce". I feel this is negligible as I think it's clear you knew what I meant

I know they cant produce it there, but it was said that they arn't allowed to broadcast.. I didn't make him say that I just debunked it with a definition. :wink:

Padawanbater2 said:
No, I meant that Obama metaphorically reached into his pants, pulled out his cock, and slathered it all over O'Reilly's big balding dome before pissing into his mouth, in other words, he got fucking owned, just like this 16 kid, Jesse Lang, owned him;

Padawanbater2 said:
From where I was sitting, he didn't dodge any questions, he treated a kid just like a little fuckin' kid, which was actually even more funny because Bill O himself knows he can't speak to the president of the United States the way he normally speaks to his guests, he had to sit there and take it like a little bitch.

The best part of the interview was when O'Reilly kept saying "well your detractors say.." and the president kept replying "you and your organization say...", as nobody BUT the FOX news channel is saying the bullshit that consistently comes out of O'Reilly and Hannity's cock-sockets.

I'm not saying I agree with anything o'reilly or any other talking head, I was pointing out that he avoided the same questions he always has..

I didn't see him get owned by obama, but I did see what obama always does, which is avoid giving a straight answer.. Hell if I was interviewing him and he kept trying to give me long winded bullshit I would interrupt him also and tell him to stop avoiding the question. Where some see him keeping his head down, thinking he is getting owned and he cant treat the president like he does his other guests is because he will be in some major shit if he makes it where the president wont sit down with them any longer.

I would bet any amount of money that obama would never sit down with an independent that wasn't tied down to any network. He wouldn't be able to avoid questions like he did with o'riley, but he would more than likely walk off the interview.

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2014

http://mikeb302000.blogspot.com/2013/04/bret-baier-lies-through-his-teeth.html

wooooops, brett baier lies about public opinion polls.

woooooooops.

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2014

beenthere said:
17 pages and not one of these left wing idiots could come up with any proof, 17 pages!

wooooops, you lied too.

Padawanbater2 · Feb 4, 2014

beenthere said:
17 pages and not one of these left wing idiots could come up with any proof, 17 pages!

How can you call anyone a "left wing nut" when they agree with you that the democratic party is full of fuckin' retards, is it that they don't agree with you that the GOP is full of super heroes?

BigNBushy · Feb 4, 2014

Hume and baier are not perfect.

Which seems to be the standard you demand from them, probably all while thinking Dan Rather is a fair reporter.

GOD HERE · Feb 4, 2014

UncleBuck said:
bettedavisthere,

Padawanbater2 · Feb 4, 2014

SirGreenThumb said:
I'm not saying I agree with anything o'reilly or any other talking head, I was pointing out that he avoided the same questions he always has..

I didn't see him get owned by obama, but I did see what obama always does, which is avoid giving a straight answer.. Hell if I was interviewing him and he kept trying to give me long winded bullshit I would interrupt him also and tell him to stop avoiding the question. Where some see him keeping his head down, thinking he is getting owned and he cant treat the president like he does his other guests is because he will be in some major shit if he makes it where the president wont sit down with them any longer.

I would bet any amount of money that obama would never sit down with an independent that wasn't tied down to any network. He wouldn't be able to avoid questions like he did with o'riley, but he would more than likely walk off the interview.

What questions did he avoid answering?

beenthere · Feb 4, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
How can you call anyone a "left wing nut" when they agree with you that the democratic party is full of fuckin' retards, is it that they don't agree with you that the GOP is full of super heroes?

I'll clear that up, I'm not talking about you Pada,

BigNBushy · Feb 4, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
How can you call anyone a "left wing nut" when they agree with you that the democratic party is full of fuckin' retards, is it that they don't agree with you that the GOP is full of super heroes?

I like this post.

budleydoright · Feb 4, 2014

beenthere said:
Speaking of morons, I've been asking for anyone to prove that Fox News is any less accurate than any other TV news source.
There's been 15 pages in this thread, not one of you dolts have come up with a thing other than typical left wing opinions.

Actually Beenthere is correct. When fox does report the news, they report the same news as everybody else. I think that is about 8% of their programming. The other 92% is what they call opinion programming where all the bullshit happens.

Bill O'Rielly, are you kidding me. He's glorified papperazzi. How would one expect Obama to respond to complete BS and made up fox news hysteria. He dumbed down his answers so that even you "I don't believe the liberal media" idiots could understand.

Padawanbater2 · Feb 4, 2014

beenthere said:
I'll clear that up, I'm not talking about you Pada,

BigNBushy said:
I like this post.

Thank you both, it's a breath of fresh air to cross the party lines and agree on the same shit sometimes, am I right?

SirGreenThumb · Feb 4, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
What questions did he avoid answering?

All of them.
Its not that hard to give a straight answer and all he did was stretch out an answer that he didn't give.

It would be like me going for a job interview for a network admin position and they ask me to explain how I would go about changing a users login in active directory, but instead of me telling them how to change a users login I explain how to install a hard drive. You think I would get the job?

What if I smelled like perfume from my mom, and my fiancee smelled it on me and asked me about it, but instead of saying I gave my mom a hug before I left I go on some wild tangent and start talking about how I was standing in line at starbucks and there was this chick in front of me with some strong perfume, blah blah... You think my lady will say ok that makes sense.. no she wouldn't.

budleydoright · Feb 4, 2014

I like my news delivered with a side of funny, Jon Stewart and The Daily Show as well as Colbert are probably better than the real news.

SirGreenThumb · Feb 4, 2014

BigNBushy said:
That's intolerant.

You will say no.

I would point that you think those you hate are useless, I, meanwhile, don't think black people are useless, nor do I hate them. You fail.

What makes it even better is that he was proven wrong about his bullshit in this very thread. :lol:

Hence the reason I have no reason to reply to him any longer. Yet he will still holler about me being this and that even though he was shown to be a liar.

SirGreenThumb · Feb 4, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
Thank you both, it's a breath of fresh air to cross the party lines and agree on the same shit sometimes, am I right?

I have no issues with you either pada, we go way back to your original work out thread. :wink:

Fun being able to debate with you on an issue with disagree on though. You are a lot better sport than the others.

budleydoright · Feb 4, 2014

SirGreenThumb said:
All of them.
Its not that hard to give a straight answer and all he did was stretch out an answer that he didn't give.

Give one example of a question he asked that was not full of stinky fox new BS. In other words, what questions did he ask about REAL events, not manufactured BS? NONE.

headwrappedturtle · Feb 4, 2014

rollitup said:
I can answer that for him:

a tiny one!

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to rollitup again.

beenthere · Feb 4, 2014

budleydoright said:
Actually Beenthere is correct. When fox does report the news, they report the same news as everybody else. I think that is about 8% of their programming. The other 92% is what they call opinion programming where all the bullshit happens.

Bill O'Rielly, are you kidding me. He's glorified papperazzi. How would one expect Obama to respond to complete BS and made up fox news hysteria. He dumbed down his answers so that even you "I don't believe the liberal media" idiots could understand.

Thanks for being honest about the news reporting part.
Actually, 55% of Fox News is opinion, 45% is hard news.

But we do have a difference of opinion on the interview though.
Obama dodged each question and was caught in three lies.

headwrappedturtle · Feb 4, 2014

rollitup said:
I can answer that for him:

a tiny one!

HWT likes this

It's All The Fault Of Fox News

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

Similar threads