The law is vague regarding "case" that meds must travel in, although it is clearly without wording about locks thus "case" is a loose definition that could include most anything (not legal advice!). It does say in trunk, but also mentions vehicles without and that in those situations, the "case" must be out of access to those in the interior of the vehicle.
Another few things that were mentioned: Usable Marijuana, means dry. Label your meds accordingly. Dry leaf is usable and regardless of common belief, will count against your limit. The new proposed bill, would changes a few things about medibles. The amount of medication inside must be labeled, but then does not count against your limit. Go figure... Also, provisioning centers have "agents" as employees. Those "agents" do not need to be a card holder what so ever.. Testing facilities will be a part of this. Local municipalities can opt to control "safety" by requiring testing, and for what. The test facilities can be run by non card holders.
(close business for the little guy, open the door for anyone with money, allow locals to call the shots) got it?
Let there be no question about my stance. I am a patient, and all sorts of fucked up. (Sorry I don't often swear). But the war on drugs is the real crime against humanity here that needs a fix. I do support legalization over this bill.
If it matters: It was also said that according to Jorge Cervantes, 15% moisture is ideal smoking material, and the definition of dry is "without moisture". Who judges "dry" is anyones guess. Maybe the judge, maybe the jury. In my situations, an officer would have to tamper with evidence to remove the label that says WET / UNUSABLE, and the humidity guage proving it.
Ill guide!