MAGA The ani-anifa therad.

twostrokenut said:

Get a grip you fucking woman. Literally noone here supports Richard Spencer's views.

Click to expand...

Olive Drab Green said:

So is wearing a peace armband to school. Tinker v. Des Moines says acts can be symbolic exercises of free speech, right? If that guy can advocate ethnic cleansing, someone else should legally be able to punch him in the face.

And I'm not the one stalking all your posts for intimate details.

Click to expand...

SneekyNinja said:

The Supreme Court seem to think differently about that one.

Click to expand...

twostrokenut said:

putting a pen to paper is an act, so is typing on a keyboard. playing a guitar or drums is an act as well. i suppose vibrating your vocal chords is an act and perhaps even the electrical synapses that lead to these acts are acts as well.

if I play hateful violent music is your mangina going to tug your feels so hard that you attempt to redefine and thus destroy the first amendment that you fought to protect?

it is.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

speaking of destroying the first amendment, tell me how we ban all muslims constitutionally, nazi boi.

Click to expand...

twostrokenut said:

I support open borders, can't help you ban all Muslims. I think Obama left you a list of the most threatening Muslim countries though so you should start there.

Click to expand...

twostrokenut said:

post up

Click to expand...

SneekyNinja said:

The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.

Click to expand...

twostrokenut said:

you attempt to redefine and thus destroy the first amendment.

Click to expand...

heckler73 said:

This is some serious fake news of highly informative value.

Click to expand...

SneekyNinja said:

The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.

Click to expand...

SneekyNinja said:

The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

freedom of religion does not mean you can build a mosque.

Click to expand...

twostrokenut said:

zoning.

Click to expand...

srh88 said:

62 pages and I still don't know who Ani Anifa is.

But I've learned about a bunch of adults who like to fantasize about being from a fake internet country who doesn't like antifa.
But honestly I don't think anyone likes antifa... It's a bunch of whiny college kids who hide behind masks who are really just making working Democrats look bad. But then again I'd like to punch a white supremacist too. I just wouldn't hide behind a mask and hide behind women if shit hits the fan

Click to expand...

srh88 said:

62 pages and I still don't know who Ani Anifa is.

But I've learned about a bunch of adults who like to fantasize about being from a fake internet country who doesn't like antifa.
But honestly I don't think anyone likes antifa... It's a bunch of whiny college kids who hide behind masks who are really just making working Democrats look bad. But then again I'd like to punch a white supremacist too. I just wouldn't hide behind a mask and hide behind women if shit hits the fan

Click to expand...

twostrokenut said:

wurd

Click to expand...