Men's Rights (cough)

dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
budman111 said:
What's it like to beyond the point of desperate futility that you are resorted to spend hours and hours trolling through dozens and dozens of years and years worth of pages to find a comment to troll with?
Click to expand...
Yeah. That probably is how you'd approach it.

Free clue. Using the tools available here for anyone to use, it was easy to narrow your non-growing posts down and filter out your recent posts. The "Twin Flame" post was at or near the top of my search results. Two minutes tops. I can see how someone like you might spends "hours and hours" performing a fairly simple task. LOL! Dolt.

Just let me in, dude! I want to twin your flame! I can tell you're the one!
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Observe & Report said:
Maybe there are very good reasons why custody cases that go to trial usually result in the mother getting custody instead of 50/50 or some other outcome, or whatever it is. I don't know. However, is the logic of your counter argument sound? Just because most cases are settled in the mothers favor doesn't mean that MRAs don't have a point about the remainder or about some other issue entirely.

Imagine you were innocently hanging out at a friends house when he was busted by the DEA and you were hauled into court as an accomplice to a major trafficking case. Would you accept an unfair trial, biased jurors, improper evidence, no presumption of innocence, etc... just because more than 95% of all federal criminal defendants plead guilty?
Click to expand...
dude,

You post is devoid of facts, just a collection of what ifs, maybes and fiction.

The facts are, 91% of all custody decisions are made by the couple, mediation or by a custody evaluation. In most marriages, the mother spends more time with the children. These are facts, not one of your fake scenarios. It only makes sense that the parent who is most engaged with the children should have custody.

Your argument is that there might be a few cases where the custody decision isn't the right one. OK. I'll buy that. In only 1.5% of all custody decisions that are decided in court, it is possible that the verdict is unjust. What slice of 1.5% is that? Even if courts were wrong 20% of the time, it would mean 0.3% of custody goes to the wrong person.

You complain about a system that is fair 99.7% of the time.

Give me a break. What these men are complaining about is loss of power and control. No wonder their marriage is breaking up. Nobody should live with an asshole once they are revealed for who they are and their children shouldn't be raised by them either..
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
Choomer. I just want you to know: if a thought pops up in your head -- literally any kind of thought -- it's completely misguided and wrong and probably toxic. An "Opposite George" scenario (or "Opposite Georgette" as the case may be) would be your best move at this juncture. It's probably your last chance for at least a semblance of happiness. Please, help me help you. Take this lifeline I offer.
Click to expand...
You don't think a woman has a fairly good understanding of feminism and "how toxic" a men's right's movement is?
Again, are you a woman?

....and using Phyllis Schlafly as a rebuttal is a bit like saying the goals of these 2 famous feminists are shared by the entire feminist community -

 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
You don't think a woman has a fairly good understanding of feminism and "how toxic" a men's right's movement is?
Again, are you a woman?

....and using Phyllis Schlafly as a rebuttal is a bit like saying the goals of these 2 famous feminists are shared by the entire feminist community -

Click to expand...
Politifake is news to you.

LOL

At least I could read and understand the meme of fakeness you copied and pasted. Surely, english isn't your native tongue. What is your first language? It's your only one, near as I can tell.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
You don't think a woman has a fairly good understanding of feminism and "how toxic" a men's right's movement is?
Again, are you a woman?

....and using Phyllis Schlafly as a rebuttal is a bit like saying the goals of these 2 famous feminists are shared by the entire feminist community -

Click to expand...
You seem obsessed with Hillary Clinton. Are you aware that she is not potus? Did you know she is actually not very relevant in the real world aside from in your heart and mind?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
Yeah. That probably is how you'd approach it.

Free clue. Using the tools available here for anyone to use, it was easy to narrow your non-growing posts down and filter out your recent posts. The "Twin Flame" post was at or near the top of my search results. Two minutes tops. I can see how someone like you might spends "hours and hours" performing a fairly simple task. LOL! Dolt.

Just let me in, dude! I want to twin your flame! I can tell you're the one!
Click to expand...
I don't feel like spending even two minutes. Care to share a link to the post he's whining about you finding?

"my wife did it" LO fucking L

He doesn't have a wife. Just a collection of centerfolds.
 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
I don't feel like spending even two minutes. Care to share a link to the post he's whining about you finding?

"my wife did it" LO fucking L

He doesn't have a wife. Just a collection of centerfolds.
Click to expand...
It's even his, excuse me, her (cough) thread:

https://www.rollitup.org/t/any-one-ever-met-their-twin-flame.785918/

The part that makes me laugh the hardest is:

"It is way more than a sole (sic) mate, think amplified by about 100 times!!!"

I think of Marky Mark's stupid confused face when reading, "think amplified by about 100 times!!!"!
 
Last edited:
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top