Michael Brown: Killed by racism

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
It seems like you are trying hard to create a belief for me, so that you can then dismantle it. That's not necessary to a discussion and sort of fouls the exchange of ideas.

I'm in favor of a market that allows individuals to chose their service providers, which also means they are not or should not be bound to pay for a so called service they don't chose or don't want. Competition begets innovation and creates choice.

A blind monopoly on force does not care about customer feedback, since their "customers" are in actuality captives.

So, tell me, why do you think consensual exchanges are a manifestation of cronyism?
I only masturbate with the invisible hand of the free market.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I only masturbate with the invisible hand of the free market.
In a free market you could likely find somebody to help you masturbate on a voluntary and consensual basis, but if you got carried away and it wasn't consensual then you'd be a kind of a rapist.

Some people like to masturbate when they see penis clouds....to each their own.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The best thing that can happen to a bully is when the targeted victim, turns the tables.
If the store owner had fucked up the punk chip thief, it would have been justified. If the thug has superior size and strength, the store owner would have been justified in tazing his ass.

Don't take shit that ain't yours.
rob, do you realize that we know exactly what word you mean when you use "thug"? uncleben gave away the game a while back on that little dog whistle you racists use.

maybe you should ask yourself why the store owner never even reported a robbery in the first place, racist.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
In a free market you could likely find somebody to help you masturbate on a voluntary and consensual basis, but if you got carried away and it wasn't consensual then you'd be a kind of a rapist.

Some people like to masturbate when they see penis clouds....to each their own.
robroy, in your little utopia, why do you think that little kids can consent to sexual activities?

why does your utopia include pedophilia?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
rob, do you realize that we know exactly what word you mean when you use "thug"? uncleben gave away the game a while back on that little dog whistle you racists use.

maybe you should ask yourself why the store owner never even reported a robbery in the first place, racist.
You might have missed that I called the white cop a thug too. So you are barking up the wrong tree again....Fido.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You might have missed that I called the white cop a thug too. So you are barking up the wrong tree again....Fido.
nice try.

why do you think that pedophilia is a "voluntary agreement" between a small child and an adult pedophile?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
robroy, in your little utopia, why do you think that little kids can consent to sexual activities?

why does your utopia include pedophilia?
You are persistent in your false allegations, I'll give you that.

When the bad man touched you, in the hypothetical situation, the lil bucky character consented to the act. You seem to have excerpted that from your narrative poopy pants. Although a person acknowledging that some acts can be consensual is not the same as that person approving of those acts is it?

For instance a person can consent to many things, you could consent to letting someone shit on your floor and that's your right, it doesn't mean that I approve of it, does it? No, it doesn't. Of course, you as a child could have consented to any number of things I wouldn't approve of, just as you as an adult could. If your consent was not under duress, it's between you and the bad man sweetie.

My utopia doesn't allow people to engage in forcing people to do things, yours does....rapist.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Except wage slavery.
Not really. People would be free to be employers, employees , self employed or unemployed. Each of those situations
would not include slavery, the individual would be free from a central authority and would be able to determine how or if they interact with others.

Perhaps you could give an example of why you think individuals making free choices is "wage slavery".
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Therefore we should get rid of the civil rights act and go back to segregation...
Erroneous conclusion. I THOUGHT your critical thinking skills were better than that.

If you get rid of a coercive central authority, especially one that has PERPETRATED racism and genocide there is no evidence that people would devolve into a bunch of thugs. In fact logic says if you end systemic thuggery....
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Erroneous conclusion. I THOUGHT your critical thinking skills were better than that.

If you get rid of a coercive central authority, especially one that has PERPETRATED racism and genocide there is no evidence that people would devolve into a bunch of thugs. In fact logic says if you end systemic thuggery....
That's exactly what I'm saying. If we get rid of the gov't, the invisible hand will no longer be encumbered from delivering everyone from strife and making anime real. We need the ruling class to go completely John Galt on our foil hat wearing asses for liberty and in order to create jobs and voluntary consensual pedophilia.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Not really. People would be free to be employers, employees , self employed or unemployed. Each of those situations
would not include slavery, the individual would be free from a central authority and would be able to determine how or if they interact with others.

Perhaps you could give an example of why you think individuals making free choices is "wage slavery".
That's exactly why we need the free market, so we can ALL be job creators.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
That's exactly why we need the free market, so we can ALL be job creators.
I know "job" and "sub" might sound the same to someone special like you, but if we wanted opinions on how to make a shitty sammich we'd ask.

Since that's all you'll ever be, please don't wade into conversations about things you don't understand.

"ICE CORES!! SCIENCE!!"
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Erroneous conclusion. I THOUGHT your critical thinking skills were better than that.

If you get rid of a coercive central authority, especially one that has PERPETRATED racism and genocide there is no evidence that people would devolve into a bunch of thugs. In fact logic says if you end systemic thuggery....
but what about the chaos from humans natural greed
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
but what about the chaos from humans natural greed
what about the brutal and oppressive order imposed by human's natural greed?



freedom and markets which are only restrained lightly, or not at all prevents the rise of dictatorial emperors, while domination of the economy ensures that we will be dominated in turn by whichever shit currently holds the orb and scepter.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Erroneous conclusion. I THOUGHT your critical thinking skills were better than that.

If you get rid of a coercive central authority, especially one that has PERPETRATED racism and genocide there is no evidence that people would devolve into a bunch of thugs. In fact logic says if you end systemic thuggery....
translation:
Anarchy Anarchy Anarchy!
Roadwarrior style bandit gangs roaming the countryside preying on any who try to build something more permanent than a brush kraal and a mud hut will result in Utopia

That's exactly what I'm saying. If we get rid of the gov't, the invisible hand will no longer be encumbered from delivering everyone from strife and making anime real. We need the ruling class to go completely John Galt on our foil hat wearing asses for liberty and in order to create jobs and voluntary consensual pedophilia.
Translation:
we need a benevolent dictator who will dominate and control every facet of life, ensuring that everyone is equal in their misery (except the ruling class of course)
returning to the dark days of feudalism and Divine Right will result in Utopia

youre both dead ass wrong.

anarchy results in nothing but Anarchy, and socialist dictatorships result in nothing but feudalism with different titles.
 

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
what about the brutal and oppressive order imposed by human's natural greed?



freedom and markets which are only restrained lightly, or not at all prevents the rise of dictatorial emperors, while domination of the economy ensures that we will be dominated in turn by whichever shit currently holds the orb and scepter.
Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.

Amen.
 

Wilksey

Well-Known Member
If you get rid of a coercive central authority, especially one that has PERPETRATED racism and genocide there is no evidence that people would devolve into a bunch of thugs.

No evidence?

How about Mexico, central, and damn near most of South America?

They're lopping heads off in Mexico like it's the 12th century...or they're in the modern day middle east....anyway, they've been gunning each other down now for what, 40 years?

Why?

Because there is NOBODY willing or able to COERCE those motherfuckers NOT to kill / butcher whoever the hell they want to in support of their cartel drug efforts. No government. No citizen. Those motherfuckers do whatever the hell they want.

Somalia is similar, as is every other "nation" that doesn't have the ability to coerce / kill shitheads like that.

Your idea of "everybody just do what you're supposed to" land is just that, an idea.

You keep on believin' though.

 
Top