More Freedom Loving Lefties On The March

R

redivider

Well-Known Member
i'm not glad that the government is telling people what they can and cannot eat.

i'm glad that there's teachers and educators with enough balls to do something when they notice that their classroom's average weight has gone up significantly in the past 15-20 years. a 9th grade teacher or a principal who's been doing it for 25 years always looks at high school kids. they used to look at a healthy classroom. now they look at a classroom or a school where almost half of the kids are overweight and an alarming number of their students are becoming obese before the age of 18.

it's not pretty, but society is failing our youth and somebody has to step in and give these kids a chance to have a healthy life.
 
R

redivider

Well-Known Member
anybody know why they can't take vending machines out of schools??????????????

because the schools need the money. they 'rent' out the hall space.... just like a school district was planning on putting advertisements on the side of school buses to make up a budget short fall.......
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
The Ruiner said:
But at the very least this would restrict access, which is the overall point of the legislation.
Click to expand...
Restricting access doesn't restrict jack shit, it just makes a otherwise legal action illegal. Drugs are restricted, but I can get any that I desire. Guns have restrictions, but the most cold blooded murderer/rapist out on parole can pick one up any day and start killing. Restricting the use of things doesn't make them go away.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
Did any of you dopes even read the attached documentdocuments? The Mayor of Boston outlawed sweets. IN BOSTON. libtards, total libtards. I am going to apply for sweet policpolice.
 
Nitegazer

Nitegazer

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
Did any of you dopes even read the attached documentdocuments? The Mayor of Boston outlawed sweets. IN BOSTON. libtards, total libtards. I am going to apply for sweet policpolice.
Click to expand...
Er, as I read it, it is for city owned properties, not all of Boston-- this would include schools as well as city worker offices mostly. I would assume you don't want to pay for the health care of obese public servants for their many years of retirement.

Nice Ann Coulter imitation, btw. Keep reading!

--edit: Ok, I eat humble pie. It IS for all public sale-- not public spaces. Guilty as charged, lol!

--edit of my edit: I regurgitate the humble pie (for now). No other news source backs the claim of the link you provided. The AP, Boston Globe and other News Sources state the ban is for CITY OWNED PROPERTIES. So, double conservi-retard on you!
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
Maybe we should make under age drinking a crime. That will stop teenage drinking. Let's outlaw obessity, and fatty food, and spandex, after all, these cost all of us.....

you lib do gooders still don't get it.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
Maybe we should make under age drinking a crime. That will stop teenage drinking. Let's outlaw obessity, and fatty food, and spandex, after all, these cost all of us.....

you lib do gooders still don't get it.
Click to expand...

I was under the impression that the right wanted local control over local things but when ever we see some local government doing something they believe is good for their citizens the right is STILL upset about something. Can they never be happy?
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
I am going to guess that since the tyrannical mayor banned sugar that the collective weight of bostonians will be plummeting. See how smart I am.?

See all the good he is doing?

I can't wait till the first diabetic sues his ass cuz he went ininto a coma and couldn't find a candy bar.
 
R

redivider

Well-Known Member
they're not making it a crime. they're banning certain foods from school. if you hadn't noticed parents seemed to have stopped feeding their kids right. kids are getting fat.

it's a slight nudge to help guide them in the right direction...
 
PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
I am going to guess that since the tyrannical mayor banned sugar that the collective weight of bostonians will be plummeting. See how smart I am.?

See all the good he is doing?

I can't wait till the first diabetic sues his ass cuz he went ininto a coma and couldn't find a candy bar.
Click to expand...
That's what you want? You are fucking pathetic!
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
jeff f, how do you explain the explosion in child and teen obesity? You figure that parents just, for some odd reason quit feeding their children correctly? What happened? and how would YOU correct it?
 
PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
I think you wanna cut medicare,,,Social security,,,Women's right's,,and getting rid of Uninon's and strugglin on with the GOP's agenda. While bitching about a fucking candy bar,,I think I'm right.
 
BudMcLovin

BudMcLovin

Active Member
canndo said:
jeff f, how do you explain the explosion in child and teen obesity? You figure that parents just, for some odd reason quit feeding their children correctly? What happened? and how would YOU correct it?
Click to expand...
My guess game consoles and computers keep children sitting on their ass these days.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
BudMcLovin said:
My guess game consoles and computers keep children sitting on their ass these days.
Click to expand...

Nothing to do with halving again the caloric intake of the average teen? Nothing to do with foods specificly designed to hit the more primitive "eat me now" buttons in a human? Nothing to do with billions in ad campaigns and marketing to teens and youngsters? Nothing to do with the fact that Ronald McDonald is the most well known figure in the U.S. for children? Nothing to do with big gulps and corn sweetner put in everything? Nothing to do with bags of salt and fat and carbs hawked to every child from every billboard and tv show?

Nahh, it must be computer games.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
canndo said:
Nothing to do with halving again the caloric intake of the average teen? Nothing to do with foods specificly designed to hit the more primitive "eat me now" buttons in a human? Nothing to do with billions in ad campaigns and marketing to teens and youngsters? Nothing to do with the fact that Ronald McDonald is the most well known figure in the U.S. for children? Nothing to do with big gulps and corn sweetner put in everything? Nothing to do with bags of salt and fat and carbs hawked to every child from every billboard and tv show?

Nahh, it must be computer games.
Click to expand...
There were fat kids back in 1850, what McDonalds were they eating at and how many sodas were they drinking from the school cafeteria? Junk food does not make people fat.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
There were fat kids back in 1850, what McDonalds were they eating at and how many sodas were they drinking from the school cafeteria? Junk food does not make people fat.
Click to expand...
Sure, there were a few, but that is the point, there were a FEW. Want figures or can I just urge you to just look around? You don't really believe that things are the same as in 1850 do you? Realy?
 
Nitegazer

Nitegazer

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
There were fat kids back in 1850, what McDonalds were they eating at and how many sodas were they drinking from the school cafeteria? Junk food does not make people fat.
Click to expand...
You had to ask...

Here is a couple lines from Advertising Age - no it's not a liberal rag, but a valued trade periodical.

In Technomic's 2009 Kids and Moms Consumer Trend Report, kids "overwhelmingly chose McDonald's as their favorite fast-food restaurant," with 37% of kids surveyed choosing it as their favorite. The second-most chosen was Subway, with 10% of kids claiming it as a favorite. About 8% of kids surveyed said Burger King was their favorite fast-food restaurant.

More important is why they are choosing it. According to Technomic's report, the "influence of a toy is much stronger for kids than parents in a kids' meal-purchasing decision." About 87% of six- and seven-year-old kids and 80% of kids ages eight and nine said they enjoyed getting a toy with their kids' meals, according to the report. "The Happy Meal has become a staple in the American family lifestyle, " said Mr. Tristano.
...

McDonald's has been upping its U.S. measured media spending on Happy Meal, according to WPP's Kantar Media. In the first half of 2010, the fast feeder has spent $45.6 million on the product. In 2009, it spent $69.5 million, compared with $65.3 million in 2008. But that's still a comparatively small slice of its budget. McDonald's total U.S. ad spending for 2009 was $873.3 million, compared with $814.2 million in 2008. In 2009 and 2008, Happy Meal spending accounted for about 8% of all U.S. measured-media spending. For the first half of 2010, it accounted for 10%.

Here is a link to the article:
http://adage.com/article/news/marketing-mcdonald-s-happy-meal-bigger-panera-ihop/147271/

Now, you might say that it is the family's choice to buy McDonalds for their kids, but that isn't what you asked. Check this link for the growth in obesity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_States

In 1850, kids were not bombarded with advertising nearly the size of some states' annual budgets. The dollars work at changing people's purchasing habits-- otherwise they wouldn't spend it. AND they know their food is bad for kids when eaten regularly. Not too different from cigarettes a few years back...

Couple of films you should check out: Super Size Me (Followed up by Super High Me), The Corporation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top