desert dude
Well-Known Member
If its cyclical, how is it irreversible?
Shhhhhh. We are hunting wabbits.
If its cyclical, how is it irreversible?
If its cyclical, how is it irreversible?
what? Cyclical, the previous civilization collapsed, people managed to create another, that one collapsed, and so on. Ours is next.
That isn't what it says.
It says too many people have more shit than the rest.
The world has always distributed resources unevenly. Always will. Civilizations have risen and fallen. Always have, always will. A bunch of geeks making "predictions" of the obvious and pretending they "got it all figured out" doesn't impress me in the slightest.
Its hardly irreversible, as stated in the title, that would be paradoxical.
It could also be argued that we will merely evolve into a more civilised society, for example, the poor of this generation are hardly comparable to the poor of previous generations.
Its hardly irreversible, as stated in the title, that would be paradoxical.
It could also be argued that we will merely evolve into a more civilised society, for example, the poor of this generation are hardly comparable to the poor of previous generations.
The world has always distributed resources unevenly. Always will. Civilizations have risen and fallen. Always have, always will. A bunch of geeks making "predictions" of the obvious and pretending they "got it all figured out" doesn't impress me in the slightest.
Skimmed through the article. Did they say when? I'm still prepped from the Mayan thing. Bring it on.![]()
How many tax "dollars" did this study cost again?
we better spend a lot more to figure out why some people have more shit than others while preaching collapse and resource distribution; tragic.
My opinion is the same as theirs. Trying to stir up controversy where there is none? I just don't pretend I made some monumental discovery, predicting the obvious. Was this group led by Capt. Obvious?Well shit, I'll take your uneducated opinion over a group of mathematicians with advanced degrees working at NASA any day.
That is the point, there is nothing new, we have seen this sort of collapse for the last 5 thousand years. I just don't like living on the cusp of the end. I have always wondered, when I was seeing the remains of ancient, advanced civilizations, just what it must have been like to be living in the last days of one of those civilizations. Did the people know where they were in time? Is even knowing about this sort of impending disaster any consolation? I imagined folks living in the shadow of the collesium, wondering what the hell it was for or thinking that the time of their great grandfather must have been a glorious one.
My opinion is the same as theirs. Trying to stir up controversy where there is none? I just don't pretend I made some monumental discovery, predicting the obvious. Was this group led by Capt. Obvious?
And then there is this. A study called preaching if it does not match one's philosophy. Why do you figure that some people have thousands of times more shit than others?
Why are you trying to start an argument? They "discovered" nothing new. Civilizations have risen and fallen throughout history over the scarcity of resources. "Tomorrow will be much like yesterday" is hardly worth shouting from the headlinesYou didn't read the story did you.
So in other words the government gets to big, people become too greedy and hungry for power and before you know it, BOOM Zombie apocalypse. Kinda sorta.![]()
I also cannot imagine how it would have been like to go through a collapse way before the information age without knowing wtf is happening, but it would seem like they would know what was happening, I would say that the people of the past were not stupid, we evolved from them, so I would think they would know it was coming though word of mouth, carrier pigeon a mother flippen fox... Yea... What are we talking about again?