i see no contradiction.You have managed to completely contradict yourself in less than 2 posts, congratulations they may be a record.
aww shit son! i luvs me sum sgetti rasslin!I agree you have that portion that would rather watch honey boo boo than learn anything but the people watching the news actually believe what they say that’s truly disconcerting.
Tyranny is the result of a failed democracy, not the cause.
Both slavery and government have at their core initiated aggression. They are very similar, and it is only a matter of degrees that separate them.Yes, but was there ever an actual vote? My point was that slavery isn't the result of democracy, not that they can't co-exist. Slavery was the norm long before there was any form of government at all.
I am willfully ignorant based on the fact that I vote with my interests. Beyond that it does not change the system. You are getting fucked by someone. Corporations make the laws....and I am not supporting the ones I dont care for. I am not preaching ignorance to politics I just have lost faith. There are wedge issues that win the elections...
aww shit son! i luvs me sum sgetti rasslin!
i cant believ that shit is on The Learning Channel.
That is how I feel because I see so many that are voting against theirs and with fervor. My interests include peace and communication, along with that political discourse and eventuall debate. There is no way around it, but you are right...I justify it because they are socially motivated but am also used to that street going in both directions.When you vote for your own interests, sometimes you inflict them onto people who do not share those interests. That's not the most peaceful approach to human relations is it?
You're equating demagoguery with democracy. But democracy, by definition, means the majority forcing the minority. unless safeguards are built in.Tyranny is the result of initiated aggression. Democracy relies upon aggression as a primary ingredient in most instances.
Almost all democracies fail, because they assume a majority consensus is somehow equated with "fair". Which is of course not always or even often the case.
It's more peaceful than beating them into submission. No?When you vote for your own interests, sometimes you inflict them onto people who do not share those interests. That's not the most peaceful approach to human relations is it?
True Story.It's more peaceful than beating them into submission. No?
It's not a perfect system but it happens to be the best so far from what I can tell...Everyone deciding their own individual laws I believe is called Anarchy. Can't have that shit.When you vote for your own interests, sometimes you inflict them onto people who do not share those interests. That's not the most peaceful approach to human relations is it?
only two laws. no initiation of force, respect for private property.True Story.
It's not a perfect system but it happens to be the best so far from what I can tell...Everyone deciding their own individual laws I believe is called Anarchy. Can't have that shit.
he killed Chick Garibaldi in the ring.
how so?
we have a record number of border patrol agents and deportations right now. net migration is at a standstill or a negative.
how is that not them trying their best to carry out their duty?
The only thing worse than something that shouldn't be illegal being so, is when the entity that enforces law declares it won't enforce some and will enforce others.so you think obama should do more to shut down cannabis in colorado and washington then?
what fundamental duties is the government not carrying out?
don't sell yourself short. you're plenty stupid.Buck..
The people are not that stupid. Brighten up a little bit.