President Jackson cut the deficit by 100%.no one has ever cut the deficit as much as obama has.
Moron.
pro tip: 100% in mathematical terms means all of it. I know how percentages are not your favorite part of simple math, so confusing and all.
President Jackson cut the deficit by 100%.no one has ever cut the deficit as much as obama has.
President Jackson cut the deficit by 100%.
Moron.
pro tip: 100% in mathematical terms means all of it. I know how percentages are not your favorite part of simple math, so confusing and all.
Obama GREW the deficit after Bush you idiot. Because he is the biggest deficit spender in the history of history. He didn't reduce jack shit, he spends spends spends and then goes to play golf. its all he does.in raw numbers, obama is the biggest deficit reducer of any president in history. no one has ever done more to reduce the deficits they were left with than obama.
in raw numbers, obama is the biggest deficit reducer of any president in history. no one has ever done more to reduce the deficits they were left with than obama.
in raw numbers, obama is the biggest deficit reducer of any president in history. no one has ever done more to reduce the deficits they were left with than obama.
Obama GREW the deficit after Bush you idiot.
President Barack Obama: Total Deficits So Far = $5.073 trillion.no he didn't.
President Barack Obama: Total Deficits So Far = $5.073 trillion.
President George W. Bush: Total = $3.294 trillion.
- FY 2013 - $901 billion.
- FY 2012 - $1.327 trillion.
- FY 2011 - $1.299 trillion.
- FY 2010 - $1.546 ($1.293 trillion plus $253 billion from the Obama Stimulus Act that was attached to the FY 2009 budget).
- FY 2009 - $1.16 trillion. ($1.416 trillion minus $253 billion from Obama's Stimulus Act)
- FY 2008 - $458 billion.
- FY 2007 - $161 billion.
- FY 2006 - $248 billion.
- FY 2005 - $318 billion.
- FY 2004 - $413 billion.
- FY 2003 - $378 billion.
- FY 2002 - $158 billion.
Tell me my math handicapped friend, is 1.546 Trillion , 1.327 trillion and 1.299 trillion all individually more than 1.16 trillion?
Yes, yes they are.
Obama GREW the deficit you inspid little loser.
http://useconomy.about.com/od/people/fl/Deficit-by-President.htm
Moron.
Buck, you can't see because you gobbled Obama's cock with such ferociousness that you blinded yourself to reality.
Moron.
You mean a BLOG?????contradicted by post #1.
Does your fat ass ugly wife know? How about her Slave owning parents?i'm gay, so you win.
I would let her, but I would hold a Playboy magazine over her faceif being a cock gobbling blogger is a disqualifier, than your link is also shit heap material.
![]()
you know that bitch has gobbled plenty of cock in her day.
She has 20 years senior-level experience in economic analysis and business strategy working for major international corporations.if being a cock gobbling blogger is a disqualifier, than your link is also shit heap material.
![]()
you know that bitch has gobbled plenty of cock in her day.
in raw numbers, obama is the biggest deficit reducer of any president in history. no one has ever done more to reduce the deficits they were left with than obama.
So, prior to 2009 there hadn't been a deficit over $500 billion. It then skyrocketed to over $1.5 trillion in 2010, then $1.29 trillion in 2011 and then $1.32 trillion in 2012. It comes in at $901 billion in 2013 and you claim a reduction because it's less than the insane deficits he was running for three years prior?
Are we at a mattress store? Where they jack the price up the day before a sale so they can claim 50% off? That's awesome. Obama the shoe salesman in chief.
"Carnies. Circus folk. Nomads, you know. Smell like cabbage. Small hands."
garble, garble, garble, glug-glug-glug, garble garbleyou are off by a year on some of your numbers.
your bad record keeping aside, are deficits structural, or do they just vary willy nilly from year to year?
last time i checked, deficits don't just go from record setting deficits to surpluses and then back from one year to the next. they basically go in one direction or another over time.
the direction is the important part. if it goes from a record setting deficit and keeps going down and down over time, like it does under obama, that is a good thing.
if the direction goes from basically 0 or a surplus and goes up and up and up to a record setting deficit over time, like it did under bush, that is a bad thing.
this logic even seems to apply when i dig or refill a hole.
when i dig a hole, i have to keep adding to the width and depth of the hole scoop by scoop. when i refill a hole, i have to keep replacing dirt into the hole scoop by scoop.
you seem to expect that obama can magically dig holes and undig holes in negative three fell swoops, rather than one shovel full of stinky republican shit at a time. is that why you keep referring to him as a "savior" and "the one" and other such retarded things which only republicans say?
good luck, rawn pawl faboi.
you are off by a year on some of your numbers.
your bad record keeping aside, are deficits structural, or do they just vary willy nilly from year to year?
last time i checked, deficits don't just go from record setting deficits to surpluses and then back from one year to the next. they basically go in one direction or another over time.
the direction is the important part. if it goes from a record setting deficit and keeps going down and down over time, like it does under obama, that is a good thing.
if the direction goes from basically 0 or a surplus and goes up and up and up to a record setting deficit over time, like it did under bush, that is a bad thing.
this logic even seems to apply when i dig or refill a hole.
when i dig a hole, i have to keep adding to the width and depth of the hole scoop by scoop. when i refill a hole, i have to keep replacing dirt into the hole scoop by scoop.
you seem to expect that obama can magically dig holes and undig holes in negative three fell swoops, rather than one shovel full of stinky republican shit at a time. is that why you keep referring to him as a "savior" and "the one" and other such retarded things which only republicans say?
good luck, rawn pawl faboi.
you are off by a year on some of your numbers.
your bad record keeping aside, are deficits structural, or do they just vary willy nilly from year to year?
last time i checked, deficits don't just go from record setting deficits to surpluses and then back from one year to the next. they basically go in one direction or another over time.
the direction is the important part. if it goes from a record setting deficit and keeps going down and down over time, like it does under obama, that is a good thing.
if the direction goes from basically 0 or a surplus and goes up and up and up to a record setting deficit over time, like it did under bush, that is a bad thing.
this logic even seems to apply when i dig or refill a hole.
when i dig a hole, i have to keep adding to the width and depth of the hole scoop by scoop. when i refill a hole, i have to keep replacing dirt into the hole scoop by scoop.
you seem to expect that obama can magically dig holes and undig holes in negative three fell swoops, rather than one shovel full of stinky republican shit at a time. is that why you keep referring to him as a "savior" and "the one" and other such retarded things which only republicans say?
good luck, rawn pawl faboi.