Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
How does our study of animals constitute a distinct difference? Animals study other animals and even humans. How do pets learn where the food is stored or when their keeper is leaving to go outside? This is not training, it is observing behavior and learning from it; study. So then your only distinction is that we use computers, laboratories, and keep written data. I am unable to see the logical connection here, and wonder how that makes me close minded.How? What animal studies US in laboratories with Computers and Massive Databases of stored information?? Or did I miss that part?
Civilization represents the idea that we are advanced in our intellect, record keeping, social behavior, and material development. As stated before, these are not unique to humans, just more refined.Sure do. Civilization, Culture, War, Poverty....name an animal that comes close to replicating any of that.
Animals engage in learned behavior that is taught to peers and offspring, such as the use of tools or communication methods, which are used for greater well being. IOW culture.
Ants wage war for territory and food. Bacterial colonies have been known to engage in warfare as well when they send a 'poison' member of the colony over to join an adjacent one.
Poverty is a term that reflects the need for nutrition, health care, clean water, ect. Poverty was invented to describe the conditions of humans not having these things, but animals can obviously lack these things as well.
There are certain concepts which arise only in the presents of higher intelligence, such as sentiment, but again, animals have intelligence, just not as advanced as ours.
The objective claim is that there is an afterlife. This afterlife would exist or non exist independent of you or your feelings. You said you feel there is something to it and indicated that this feeling is 'good enough'. I only pointed out that intuition can and often does lead us to false beliefs, which is worse than nowhere. A feeling is not good enough for anything but the beginning of inquiry. BTW you will not find one post of mine on here where I insult someone for grammar or spelling errors.It's thinking like that which leads us nowhere. And since you seem so high on proper grammar, a slight correction for you: I clearly said " I haven't definitely settled on any possibility after physical death..but I feel as if there's something" The fact that I'm relying on feeling makes this a subjective claim...not objective.
You can go by your feelings and it is indeed the only thing you have to go on, but that is not justification for drawing any sort of conclusions....mmmmkay...So, tell me then how I'm supposed to go off anything BUT my feelings in regards to the Afterlife?? Unless you have some kind of research stashed away that Humanity doesn't know about..