Brazko
Well-Known Member
This wasn't a post to say evolution is invalid, it was more to the point that diverse life appeared at once.., Those factors you mentioned have little revelancy to the fact that these fossils have been found all over the world, and although the subtle variance in like species the basic blueprint of differing structures took place all over the planet.., The subject of algae you speak of including the bacteria and so forth is part of it but it's not saying evolution is false just the way it may of happened, as suggested instead of there being 1 common ancestor, that there was a field of ancestors, but all at once (not abracadabra once), geologocially speaking. Also, that's the question as to why we don't have no trace of transitional fossils at this stage, when we have identified embryos of microscopic level and soft tissue, prior to the cambrian fossils, but no transitional fossils from single cellular to the many multicellular species that inhabitated the water around the world at once. The evolution Phylum theory still remains quite reasonably true, but it just wasn't one phylum, but a field!! It doesn't mean the transitions didn't happen, but the information and evidence points differently.
I've watched a little over halve of the full length movie, and it goes into detail of how the information must be passed along through the membrane of the cell (before DNA plays a role) within the single cell, which begins it's mutation into the more complex multicellular organisms.., And that is the ponder now as to where this information must have come from ie. ID, or if not through selective transitional mutations (which are not evident, yet). I would have posted the movie as well but, it hasn't been put up on the web and is only available by DVD now. I just happened to catch it on t.v. last night scrolling and began looking into it further.
Darwin's Dilemma: the Cambrian explosion
The information I watched looked pretty solid, although I have seen from both sides of the arguements through researching, of people making non-sensical statements and assumptions with regards to the information, while disallowing competent reasoning and logic within the components of the evidence provided. (ie. everybody sticking to their faith)
And what was the point? 
