I hate how people believe in karma, yet can't even explain the basic idea behind it. Shit really gets on my nerves..
I agree. Karma is the belief that the nature of our deeds determines the nature of our luck. The problem is that most people can not explain how the deeds turn into luck, nor have they tried. When they do try, they use science sounding language and cite thermodynamic laws and quantum theory, despite their explanations directly contradicting those laws. A variation of this idea has recently gained new attention with the release of the book 'The Secret', which was endorsed by Oprah. Now we have tens of thousands of housewives out there who believe that they can get their husbands to stop cheating on them if they just want it hard enough. My questions to you are; what do you suppose the harm in this sort of belief is, and why do you suppose it has pervaded multiple cultures and persisted for so long?
Have any of you smoked dmt?
I have not but I do accredit MJ and LSD for some of the early inclinations I had towards critical thinking. I remember tripping one time as a teen watching TV by myself and every commercial seemed to be saying "hey you, buy this product! You'll love it! This guy loved it! These people are happy! It's a fuckin great product!". I think a lot of teens who experiment with drugs have a tendency towards skepticism via their desire to rebel, they just lack the focus and wisdom to utilize it properly.
I find most conspiracy theories silly. Most of them need such a high level of cooperative silence on so many levels that just isn't possible. I think the ancient alien stuff is so easily refuted. The people that believe it, want to believe, they stretch the evidence to make it fit their beliefs while all of the time dismissing the more rational explanations.
Ah but the fact that so many people keep quiet on such a large scale is just indication of how grand the conspiracy is! But really, it is hard to believe conspiracies which require thousands and thousands of people to have had knowledge, but never produce one deathbed confession or one member who found Jesus and wants to come clean. All conspiracy theories have this in common, as well as the luxury of being able to turn any criticism of the theory into support for the theory, via the conspiracy. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and conspiracy theories provide nothing but an extraordinary lack of proof.
Being a magician helped me learn how we can intentionally fool the mind. Misdirection takes many forms, including verbal, visual, auditory, time-based. Some of the oldest magic books have ideas in them that neuroscientists are now just confirming. People have known for a long time before science that the mind can be fooled and taken advantage of this. When done outside the stage and passed off as real, even those of high intelligence have been fooled. People still believe in witchcraft and shaminism and other sorts of magic. I find that credulous as well.
Yep magicians often demonstrate artful critical thinking skills. (with perhaps the exception of David Blaine) and some of them are quite vocal about promoting skepticism. Magicians demonstrate that it is possible, even when you are fully aware of the trappings of human perceptions and biases, to be fooled simply and completely right in front of your eyes. I am curious, as a magician and mentalist are you often fooled by other performers tricks when you first see them?
Another profession which produces a lot of critical thinkers is comedy, particularly stand ups. Writing stand up comedy often entails not taking things at face value and dissecting the reasons why humans do and think certain things. Comedians spend a lot of time thinking deeply about subjects like religion and political and emotional motivation. Interesting that so many of them have come to similar conclusions as skeptics, magicians and scientists.
what i am very curious about is why cant atheists just let believers be, well at least myself? Why do they hold my beliefs against me?
How is possible to be guilty by association?
Well Oly here you were given a chance to steer the topic away from theistic examination, and you seem to wish to persist, but fair enough, lets look at the reasons we think passive beliefs do or do not hurt society. I actually asked these questions a few pages back, but people were distracted. How about you take a shot at answering them from your perspective?
If a person believes something and keeps it to themselves while tolerating other mindsets, is it possible for this belief to harm society? Do we automatically find fault in a persons conduct if we find fault in their beliefs? Is a belief really passive if you refuse to work with others unless the keep quiet about it?