veggiegardener
Well-Known Member
Can't read or think for yourself?Hear hear!!!
Can't read or think for yourself?Hear hear!!!
Thats ridiculous. You can't prosecute 215 patients under 19, read the prop.... sections 6, 7 and 8 specifically exclude patients under 215. 19 specifically states that provisions of 19 DO NOT apply to patients under 215. How much clearer can the language be? 19 opens up rights to those not involved in 215. Plain and simple.They wouldnt be brought up under 215, they would be brought up on violations of 19. Law enforcement knows they cant win a lot of cases battling against 215, but 19, you-fucking-betcha they can and will be prosecuting people under the new provisions of 19.
I wish I'd said that first.You are qualified to comment how again? Yes, I have a constitutional right to grow my cannabis. If you dont understand that, then you have absolutely no understanding of medical marijuana laws.
Where do you live again?
Vote YES on 19 and lead the nation in formulating sensible marijuana laws.
Post 177 is a self serving post by you that does not address a single fact or item in prop 19. You are doing nothing more than gazing into a crystal ball and making the most dire of predictions.I guess you ignore what you can't respond too?
Address post #177.
Were does it state anywhere that one overrides the other? It doesnt, so they dont. 215 applies to MMJ card holders and 19 applies the the remainder.They wouldnt be brought up under 215, they would be brought up on violations of 19. Law enforcement knows they cant win a lot of cases battling against 215, but 19, you-fucking-betcha they can and will be prosecuting people under the new provisions of 19.
If you read more carefully. I mean like you actually went to school, you might realize that cultivation was NEVER mentioned, other than referring to 420 and 215, WHICH CURRENTLY INCLUDE NO RESTRICTION ON GROW SIZE.Thats ridiculous. You can't prosecute 215 patients under 19, read the prop.... sections 6, 7 and 8 specifically exclude patients under 215. 19 specifically states that provisions of 19 DO NOT apply to patients under 215. How much clearer can the language be? 19 opens up rights to those not involved in 215. Plain and simple.
I bet that response took all the thought process you could muster.Can't read or think for yourself?
It doesn't matter where I live, and for you to ask that and dismiss my arguments FRO prop 19 because of it is ridiculous. This upcoming vote has become a national discussion and those of you with 215 cards that are suffering terrible pain and terminal illness in california do not own the discussion.You are qualified to comment how again? Yes, I have a constitutional right to grow my cannabis. If you dont understand that, then you have absolutely no understanding of medical marijuana laws.
Where do you live again?
Well if lawyers are saying it, then it MUST be true! That's some truly impeccable logic and reasoning there.Your logic and reasoning are flawed here. Why would a court of law, in deciding a 215 issue, refer to prop 19, which has nothing to do with compassionate medical usage? Several lawyers have already made this case, and you and others against 19 refuse to accept that. In fact, your arguments perfectly orchestrate what I have been saying all along; ""the only smokers fighting 19 are medical marijuana smokers."" That in and of it's self tells me 215 is abused.
Oh yes, the "exemptions" how could I forget those!?! The "exemptions" that wouldnt even need to be written into the bill if they had added the CUA in section 2C (2)... where the ACTUAL laws to be exempted from the reach of 19 are listed...thats right....thanks serapis for your out of state inside track on 19.Thats ridiculous. You can't prosecute 215 patients under 19, read the prop.... sections 6, 7 and 8 specifically exclude patients under 215. 19 specifically states that provisions of 19 DO NOT apply to patients under 215. How much clearer can the language be? 19 opens up rights to those not involved in 215. Plain and simple.
DUDE!Were does it state anywhere that one overrides the other? It doesnt, so they dont. 215 applies to MMJ card holders and 19 applies the the remainder.
Let's see where it says that. I have a hard time believing anything you say. But wait, if California's constitution has the power to override laws in propositions, what's stopping them from overriding prop 215?DUDE!
You need to read more than what the authors wish to spoon feed you.
The fact is, the STATE CONSTITUTION includes the language empowering referendums(propositions) to override all other laws.
THINK!
I'm not going to result to tossing insults around like you have, but for your info, I'm pursuing a masters degree and am sure that my education far outperforms yours. Let me explain something to you regarding law.... have you heard of the term precedent? I suggest you look it up and apply it to 215 and then take a look at prop 19. Those of you that are making the stretch that 19 supersedes 215 are the ones that have no informed opinion.If you read more carefully. I mean like you actually went to school, you might realize that cultivation was NEVER mentioned, other than referring to 420 and 215, WHICH CURRENTLY INCLUDE NO RESTRICTION ON GROW SIZE.
By mentioning 25 square feet, Prop 19 brings restrictions to state law, WITHOUT EXEMPTING MMJ GROWS.
If you can't understand that, you don't understand the issues well enough to have an informed opinion.
as far as as being in California, you can see from my location, i'm in NYDo you live in California? Do you read?
It took over a decade to settle most of the many issues left open by 215 and 420.
19 is far muddier than they were.
The justice system went to great lengths to ignore both statutes until the CA Supreme Court had a moment of clarity.
I'm betting that no DA's office in California has spent the necessary to study this bill.
They're short handed, and very busy, prosecuting everybody they can, in support of the prison system.
California has lots of prisons that need to remain full, if all those employees are to keep their jobs.
It's about the only growth industry in California, right now.
Go rob a liquor store if you want to help.
If you won't, they'll probably get you for having 30 grams, or your grow takes 26 square feet.
I posted all my reasons a bunch of times.
I've only written about 1700 posts.
Search, and you will find.
Again, you are making jumps of logic, huge ones. And I could care less where i live. Last time I checked, California is one of the US states and marijuana laws have been i the news about as much as gay marriage. I have just as much right to spread facts as you do dis-information about 19.Oh yes, the "exemptions" how could I forget those!?! The "exemptions" that wouldnt even need to be written into the bill if they had added the CUA in section 2C (2)... where the ACTUAL laws to be exempted from the reach of 19 are listed...thats right....thanks serapis for your out of state inside track on 19.
Let's see where it says that. I have a hard time believing anything you say. But wait, if California's constitution has the power to override laws in propositions, what's stopping them from overriding prop 215?
Again, you absolutely missed the point.Let's see where it says that. I have a hard time believing anything you say. But wait, if California's constitution has the power to override laws in propositions, what's stopping them from overriding prop 215?
A masters dont mean shit dude...and you better hope your ass never gets busted because your career as a server with a masters degree might get ruined.I'm not going to result to tossing insults around like you have, but for your info, I'm pursuing a masters degree and am sure that my education far outperforms yours. Let me explain something to you regarding law.... have you heard of the term precedent? I suggest you look it up and apply it to 215 and then take a look at prop 19. Those of you that are making the stretch that 19 supersedes 215 are the ones that have no informed opinion.
So if you want to start tossing around insults, go visit a school yard and feel free to do so with your peers. If you want to have a debate on actual issues like an adult, bring your facts.....