Renewable Energy + Battery Storage = Fossil Fuels Obsolete, Even Natural Gas

doublejj

doublejj

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
That will sell well.

They just need to figure out how to build a lot of them quickly and well.

The car business is much more difficult and involves much more technological expertise than most people give it credit for, including one Elon Musk.
Click to expand...
Shanghi will build Model y's......
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
doublejj said:
Shanghi will build Model y's......
Click to expand...
I think their cost and sourcing issues have a lot more to do with batteries than labor.

China is more willing to invest in the future than the United States is these days.

That's a sad commentary on the state of our nation, right there.
 
Last edited:
doublejj

doublejj

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
I think their cost and sourcing issues have a lot more to do with batteries than labor.

Cons is more willing to invest in the future than the United States is these days.

That's a sad commentary on the state of our nation, right there.
Click to expand...
Chinese banks are 100% funding Teslas Shanghi factory....
 
Stink Bug

Stink Bug

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Stink Bug said:
http://www.kin152.org/climatologie/CO2.pdf

Not the sort of paper globalists who use climate change as a scare tactic to push an agenda want us to see.
Click to expand...
I just skimmed the summary, but I've come across this claim before. The scientific conclusion that supports climate change is not based on a few individual studies, it's based on the collective of studies gathered since climate change was discovered. The overwhelming scientific evidence points to an anthropogenic factor being the main contributor to climate change since the beginning of the 20th century
 
Buddha2525

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I just skimmed the summary, but I've come across this claim before. The scientific conclusion that supports climate change is not based on a few individual studies, it's based on the collective of studies gathered since climate change was discovered. The overwhelming scientific evidence points to an anthropogenic factor being the main contributor to climate change since the beginning of the 20th century
Click to expand...
Why do only those who believe in climate change 110% get funding to "research" a forgone conclusion, while those who express doubt get fired or their research denied? That's not how science works but it's how scientism works.

Scientism starts with a conclusion and uses back propagation to find a cause.

Science starts with a proposed cause and uses forward propagation to support a conclusion.

I believe in science but despise climate scientism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top