Roger Stone

warmer..you're getting warmer..

Indicting Roger Stone, Mueller Shows Link Between Trump Campaign and WikiLeaks


The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, revealed on Friday the most direct link yet between the Trump campaign’s and WikiLeaks’ parallel efforts to use Democratic Party material stolen by Russians to damage the election campaign of Hillary R. Clinton.

In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election.

The indictment makes no mention of whether Mr. Trump played a role in the coordination, though Mr. Mueller did leave a curious clue about how high in the campaign the effort reached: A senior campaign official “was directed” by an unnamed person to contact Mr. Stone about additional WikiLeaks releases that might damage the Clinton campaign, according to the court document.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/us/politics/roger-stone-trump-mueller.html

schuylaar said:

warmer..you're getting warmer..

Indicting Roger Stone, Mueller Shows Link Between Trump Campaign and WikiLeaks


The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, revealed on Friday the most direct link yet between the Trump campaign’s and WikiLeaks’ parallel efforts to use Democratic Party material stolen by Russians to damage the election campaign of Hillary R. Clinton.

In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election.

The indictment makes no mention of whether Mr. Trump played a role in the coordination, though Mr. Mueller did leave a curious clue about how high in the campaign the effort reached: A senior campaign official “was directed” by an unnamed person to contact Mr. Stone about additional WikiLeaks releases that might damage the Clinton campaign, according to the court document.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/us/politics/roger-stone-trump-mueller.html

Click to expand...

Nice citation.

Seems people here can't be bothered with those much anymore.

ttystikk said:

Nice citation.

Seems people here can't be bothered with those much anymore.

Click to expand...

Says the guy who wants big money out of election but fails to understand what HR1 is about.
Low information voter

schuylaar said:

warmer..you're getting warmer..

Indicting Roger Stone, Mueller Shows Link Between Trump Campaign and WikiLeaks


The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, revealed on Friday the most direct link yet between the Trump campaign’s and WikiLeaks’ parallel efforts to use Democratic Party material stolen by Russians to damage the election campaign of Hillary R. Clinton.

In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election.

The indictment makes no mention of whether Mr. Trump played a role in the coordination, though Mr. Mueller did leave a curious clue about how high in the campaign the effort reached: A senior campaign official “was directed” by an unnamed person to contact Mr. Stone about additional WikiLeaks releases that might damage the Clinton campaign, according to the court document.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/us/politics/roger-stone-trump-mueller.html

Click to expand...

Thanks for posting from a credible source.

Many of your kind don't do that.

Fogdog said:

Thanks for posting from a credible source.

Many of your kind don't do that.

Click to expand...

Poor Tty, he's grasping at straws.

I loved the picture he was in that gave the I'm not a crook Nixon pose.

ttystikk said:

Nice citation.

Seems people here can't be bothered with those much anymore.

Click to expand...

we'll never change their minds all we can do is bring the info and hope someone questions their incorrect belief (non-facts) and wish to get it right-

schuylaar said:

we'll never change their minds all we can do is bring the info and hope someone questions their incorrect belief (non-facts) and wish to get it right-

Click to expand...

Like the non-fact of you foregoing a six figure income to be a taxi driver?

schuylaar said:

we'll never change their minds all we can do is bring the info and hope someone questions their incorrect belief (non-facts) and wish to get it right-

Click to expand...

It turns out that lots of people read these threads but don't post because they don't want to put up with the clowns here.

They PM me regularly to tell me they appreciate my posts, especially the links supporting my points.

Unclebaldrick said:

Like the non-fact of you foregoing a six figure income to be a taxi driver?

Click to expand...

No, like the endless non sequitur that is your entire life here.

ttystikk said:

It turns out that lots of people read these threads but don't post because they don't want to put up with the clowns here.

They PM me regularly to tell me they appreciate my posts, especially the links supporting my points.

Click to expand...

Did methigan buy your account after he got banned again

UncleBuck said:

Did methigan buy your account after he got banned again

Click to expand...

Do you actually have anything to say about Roger Stone's indictment?

ttystikk said:

Do you actually have anything to say about Roger Stone's indictment?

Click to expand...

it was a serious question

lots of people PM privately to tell me they think you are a sexual deviant but don't want to risk getting locked in a dog cage by posting here openly

UncleBuck said:

it was a serious question

lots of people PM privately to tell me they think you are a sexual deviant but don't want to risk getting locked in a dog cage by posting here openly

Click to expand...

They're more than welcome to their opinions.

That said, you aren't entitled to your own facts.

UncleBuck said:

Did methigan buy your account after he got banned again

Click to expand...

You really never leave this room.

ttystikk said:

It turns out that lots of people read these threads but don't post because they don't want to put up with the clowns here.

They PM me regularly to tell me they appreciate my posts, especially the links supporting my points.

Click to expand...

People pm me with or to get dirt on Buck and the few amigos.

UncleBuck said:

it was a serious question

lots of people PM privately to tell me they think you are a sexual deviant but don't want to risk getting locked in a dog cage by posting here openly

Click to expand...

I received a call at my office from a very credible source that confirmed this.

ttystikk said:

No, like the endless non sequitur that is your entire life here.

Click to expand...

Hmmm, I point out your non sequitur in your opening Novichok rant and now you accuse me of ... Lol. That's so Tty.

UncleBuck said:

it was a serious question

lots of people PM privately to tell me they think you are a sexual deviant but don't want to risk getting locked in a dog cage by posting here openly

Click to expand...

This is one of the most interesting and revealing things Tty has said in a long time. It exposes the depths of his narcissism better than any dozen other posts. It also exposes him as hopelessly naive and easily manipulated.

It isn't enough for Tty to take a stand and have some sort of misguided pride in his beliefs, it is very important to him to portray himself as respected by others. Or maybe he just needs to fool himself into thinking he is.

So he expects us to believe that many people are reading these pages and are just too afraid to "like" his posts. They need to maintain their safety by secretly PMing him to encourage him. Maybe it is a delusion or maybe it has some truth to it. Either way, with Tty's unswervable belief that he is a superior intellect, he would never, ever question the source, he would just accept it in a way that makes him feel best about himself.

This is one of the problems with the Progressives. The idea that they are being manipulated to play a major role in the Trumpian takeover of the country is beyond them and there is no assistance that they wouldn't gladly take without considering the consequences.

If Trumpians want to encourage Tty to do their bidding, all it will cost them is a couple of PMs that help Tty preen himself. One PM will be good for a hundred ridiculous posts.

Would Progressive candidates turn down substantial assistance from unknown forces if it served their purposes? Oh hell no, no more than Trump himself would.

These people are just another symptom of the disease we are all fighting.

Feds zero in on Roger Stone's "shady" condo purchase | Salon.com

Feds zero in on Roger Stone's "shady" condo purchase
The government claims they have the right to seize Roger Stone's recently purchased condo

Veteran Republican operative Roger Stone is yet again in the crosshairs of the Department of Justice, this time over after a questionable mortgage deal that is the centerpiece of an ongoing civil case which alleges he owes millions in back taxes.

"The government's complaint lays out a complicated scheme. It describes the condo purchase as an overt act of fraud, and claims a right to seize the property. Essentially, prosecutors say, Stone and his wife Nydia used $140,000 from a private company they already held (Drake Ventures) for a down payment on a condo," The Daily Beast reported on Friday. "Picking up the rest of the tab—almost exactly $400,000—was a mortgage lender."

The lender who provided Stone the loan in question spoke to the outlet and said they had been misled, adding that they "likely wouldn't have granted the loan if he had known the full picture."

Former IRS criminal investigator Martin Sheil cast doubt upon the idea that any lender could overlook the Stone's hefty legal problems, let alone miss them entirely while researching a potential deal.

"For this transaction, I'd use the term 'shady.' I don't know why anybody would loan them money," Sheil said. "The ignorance is profound, and I almost can't believe what you're telling me."

A lawyer representing Stone responded to the news, arguing that "nothing whatsoever improper" occurred. Following the publication of the Beast's story, the self-described "dirty-trickster" took aim at Roger Sollenberger, the Daily Beast reporter who penned the original piece.

"The trail of smears from the haters at the Daily Beast continue. There was nothing improper or illegal with my wife's down payment on a small condominium where she could live if I was railroaded to prison. Now Roger Sollenberger is attacking a woman battling stage four cancer," Stone wrote on the far-right social media site Gab. "Too many outrageous falsehoods in this piece to address here," he added, without citing a single one of those falsehoods.

Stone didn't return a Salon request for comment.