Should the US shed blood for Ukraine

Should the USA along with NATO defend Ukraine with troops.

  • Yes

    Votes: 40 40.4%
  • No

    Votes: 59 59.6%

  • Total voters
    99

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
With President Biden’s top security adviser warning that Russia could invade Ukraine “any day now,” a new poll shows that Donald Trump voters are now more than twice as likely as Joe Biden voters to say “the conflict is none of America’s business” — a striking role reversal after decades of right-wing hawkishness toward Moscow.

The shift presumably reflects the influence of GOP figures such as Trump and top Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who have long rationalized & supported Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The poll of 1,628 U.S. adults, which was conducted from Feb. 3 to 7, found that a full 42 percent of Trump voters now say the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is none of America’s business — 6 points more than the share who say “it’s in America’s best interests to stop Russia and help Ukraine” (36 percent).

In contrast, 60 percent of Biden voters now insist that it is in America’s best interests to help Ukraine, while just 20 percent disagree and claim the conflict doesn’t concern the U.S.

By the same token, more Trump voters now say the U.S. should take “neither” country’s side in the clash (49 percent) than say the U.S. should side with Ukraine (46 percent). Biden voters say the opposite, with more than two-thirds (67 percent) insisting the U.S. should side with Ukraine, compared with just 29 percent who prefer neutrality.

To some degree, this gap may arise from America’s usual partisan patterns. As more than 130,000 Russian troops mass on the Ukraine border, it has been Biden, not Trump, who has been trying to defuse the situation by threatening “swift and severe” economic sanctions and sending arms and troops to the region. It is not surprising that Americans who voted for the current president would be more inclined to favor his approach than those who backed his predecessor.

Yet the new poll results also suggest that partisanship isn’t the only — or even the major — force at work here. Conservatives are also divided among themselves, signaling a larger rift between traditional Republicans and their TrumpTard counterparts that could complicate America’s efforts to respond to Russia.

By and large, Republican leaders in Congress have encouraged Biden to get tougher on Russia by imposing immediate sanctions on Russian energy exports and sending more lethal aid to Ukraine’s military.

But Fox’s Carlson has repeatedly questioned U.S. support for Ukraine, asking on Nov. 10 why the U.S. would take Ukraine's side and arguing in December that Putin was justified in building up troops along the border.

"Ukraine is not strategic for America's interest" (unlike Vietnam, right?) Carlson added in January. “No rational person could defend a war with Russia over Ukraine.”

Sure enough, poll respondents who name Fox as their most-watched cable news network say the U.S. should take neither country’s side rather than Ukraine’s by 48 percent to 44 percent. Among those who watch CNN, the split is 53 percent to 37 percent in favor of Ukraine; MSNBC viewers, meanwhile, are 70 percent pro-Ukraine to 24 percent pro-neutrality. As Carlson steers rank-and-file Republicans toward Russia, his liberal counterpart, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, appears to be having the opposite effect on her audience.

Another important factor is the strength of party identification. On the question of which side to take in the confrontation between Russia and Ukraine, self-described Democrats look a lot like independents who lean Democratic. Less than a quarter of both groups — 22 percent and 24 percent, respectively — say the conflict is none of America’s business.

But on the right it’s a different story. There, independents who lean Republican (57 percent) are 7 points more likely than self-described Republicans (50 percent) to insist that the U.S. should stay neutral. They’re also 9 points less likely — 30 percent vs. 39 percent — to say it’s in America’s best interests to help Ukraine and stop Russia.

The implication is clear: On the right, the less strongly someone identifies as a Republican, the more skeptical they tend to be of intervening on Ukraine’s behalf.

Age and income seem to contribute as well. Hawkishness prevails among older Republicans, with those over 45 favoring Ukraine (51 percent) over neutrality (48 percent) and those under 45 favoring neutrality (53 percent) over Ukraine (32 percent)

The same goes for Republicans who make more or less than $50,000 a year; the former side with Ukraine by 4 points, while the latter side with “neither” by 24.

The picture that emerges is of a significant faction of non-establishment-oriented conservatives — younger, less wealthy and less engaged with Washington politics — who now favor a softer stance toward Russia.

Their views were likely shaped by several years of sympathetic statements from Trump, who said in 2016 that Putin “has been a leader far more than” then-President Barack Obama, and who continued to defend and praise his Russian counterpart throughout his presidency, particularly as evidence emerged that Putin had meddled in the 2016 election to benefit him.

As political commentator William Saletan recently pointed out in Slate, “In Gallup polls before 2016, Republicans generally viewed Russia less favorably than Democrats did. Now it’s the other way around.”

Polls taken in June of last year also showed that Putin enjoys a better net favorable rating among Republicans than Biden does, by anywhere from 16 to 22 percentage points. In a January survey 62 percent of Republicans said Putin was “a stronger leader” than Biden. (God I would LOVE to choke a Republican)

As a result, there is little consensus among Americans as a whole about how to proceed. Just 40 percent, for instance, say it’s in America’s best interests to stop Russia and help Ukraine, while 33 percent say the conflict is none of America’s business and 27 percent are unsure. Similarly, more Americans now say the U.S. should stay neutral (49 percent) rather than take Ukraine’s side (46 percent).

Meanwhile, not one of a list of potential U.S. policy responses garners majority support. The most popular — “continue diplomacy with Russia to avoid an invasion” (43 percent) and “implement severe economic sanctions to counter an invasion” (39 percent) — fall short by several points. None of the rest — “send arms to Ukraine” (24 percent); “send troops to the region to bolster defenses, including to Ukraine” (19 percent); “send troops to the region to bolster defenses, but not to Ukraine” (19 percent); “avoid further foreign conflict by agreeing to Putin’s demands” (6 percent) — appeal to more than a quarter of the public.

Yet on the question of Putin’s demands for NATO to withdraw from Eastern Europe and bar Ukraine from joining the alliance, Trump voters (14 percent) are nearly twice as likely as Biden voters (8 percent) to describe them as “reasonable.”

So, Tucker Carlson & his listeners are having a major influence on US foreign policy

Holy fuck

We're fucking doomed.

Thanks Murdoch/Fox, you singlehandedly have fucking ruined the USA

Was that your purpose/goal?

Sorta fitting in a way that just a corperation for profit/ratings was willing to and able to Divide/Destroy the US

Corporations win and we the sane get fucking obliterated.

Fox wins.

America loses.

If you're interested, I say Putin has to either back off or be stopped by any means necessary.

He can't be allowed to succeed.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
With President Biden’s top security adviser warning that Russia could invade Ukraine “any day now,” a new poll shows that Donald Trump voters are now more than twice as likely as Joe Biden voters to say “the conflict is none of America’s business” — a striking role reversal after decades of right-wing hawkishness toward Moscow.

The shift presumably reflects the influence of GOP figures such as Trump and top Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who have long rationalized & supported Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The poll of 1,628 U.S. adults, which was conducted from Feb. 3 to 7, found that a full 42 percent of Trump voters now say the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is none of America’s business — 6 points more than the share who say “it’s in America’s best interests to stop Russia and help Ukraine” (36 percent).

In contrast, 60 percent of Biden voters now insist that it is in America’s best interests to help Ukraine, while just 20 percent disagree and claim the conflict doesn’t concern the U.S.

By the same token, more Trump voters now say the U.S. should take “neither” country’s side in the clash (49 percent) than say the U.S. should side with Ukraine (46 percent). Biden voters say the opposite, with more than two-thirds (67 percent) insisting the U.S. should side with Ukraine, compared with just 29 percent who prefer neutrality.

To some degree, this gap may arise from America’s usual partisan patterns. As more than 130,000 Russian troops mass on the Ukraine border, it has been Biden, not Trump, who has been trying to defuse the situation by threatening “swift and severe” economic sanctions and sending arms and troops to the region. It is not surprising that Americans who voted for the current president would be more inclined to favor his approach than those who backed his predecessor.

Yet the new poll results also suggest that partisanship isn’t the only — or even the major — force at work here. Conservatives are also divided among themselves, signaling a larger rift between traditional Republicans and their TrumpTard counterparts that could complicate America’s efforts to respond to Russia.

By and large, Republican leaders in Congress have encouraged Biden to get tougher on Russia by imposing immediate sanctions on Russian energy exports and sending more lethal aid to Ukraine’s military.

But Fox’s Carlson has repeatedly questioned U.S. support for Ukraine, asking on Nov. 10 why the U.S. would take Ukraine's side and arguing in December that Putin was justified in building up troops along the border.

"Ukraine is not strategic for America's interest" (unlike Vietnam, right?) Carlson added in January. “No rational person could defend a war with Russia over Ukraine.”

Sure enough, poll respondents who name Fox as their most-watched cable news network say the U.S. should take neither country’s side rather than Ukraine’s by 48 percent to 44 percent. Among those who watch CNN, the split is 53 percent to 37 percent in favor of Ukraine; MSNBC viewers, meanwhile, are 70 percent pro-Ukraine to 24 percent pro-neutrality. As Carlson steers rank-and-file Republicans toward Russia, his liberal counterpart, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, appears to be having the opposite effect on her audience.

Another important factor is the strength of party identification. On the question of which side to take in the confrontation between Russia and Ukraine, self-described Democrats look a lot like independents who lean Democratic. Less than a quarter of both groups — 22 percent and 24 percent, respectively — say the conflict is none of America’s business.

But on the right it’s a different story. There, independents who lean Republican (57 percent) are 7 points more likely than self-described Republicans (50 percent) to insist that the U.S. should stay neutral. They’re also 9 points less likely — 30 percent vs. 39 percent — to say it’s in America’s best interests to help Ukraine and stop Russia.

The implication is clear: On the right, the less strongly someone identifies as a Republican, the more skeptical they tend to be of intervening on Ukraine’s behalf.

Age and income seem to contribute as well. Hawkishness prevails among older Republicans, with those over 45 favoring Ukraine (51 percent) over neutrality (48 percent) and those under 45 favoring neutrality (53 percent) over Ukraine (32 percent)

The same goes for Republicans who make more or less than $50,000 a year; the former side with Ukraine by 4 points, while the latter side with “neither” by 24.

The picture that emerges is of a significant faction of non-establishment-oriented conservatives — younger, less wealthy and less engaged with Washington politics — who now favor a softer stance toward Russia.

Their views were likely shaped by several years of sympathetic statements from Trump, who said in 2016 that Putin “has been a leader far more than” then-President Barack Obama, and who continued to defend and praise his Russian counterpart throughout his presidency, particularly as evidence emerged that Putin had meddled in the 2016 election to benefit him.

As political commentator William Saletan recently pointed out in Slate, “In Gallup polls before 2016, Republicans generally viewed Russia less favorably than Democrats did. Now it’s the other way around.”

Polls taken in June of last year also showed that Putin enjoys a better net favorable rating among Republicans than Biden does, by anywhere from 16 to 22 percentage points. In a January survey 62 percent of Republicans said Putin was “a stronger leader” than Biden. (God I would LOVE to choke a Republican)

As a result, there is little consensus among Americans as a whole about how to proceed. Just 40 percent, for instance, say it’s in America’s best interests to stop Russia and help Ukraine, while 33 percent say the conflict is none of America’s business and 27 percent are unsure. Similarly, more Americans now say the U.S. should stay neutral (49 percent) rather than take Ukraine’s side (46 percent).

Meanwhile, not one of a list of potential U.S. policy responses garners majority support. The most popular — “continue diplomacy with Russia to avoid an invasion” (43 percent) and “implement severe economic sanctions to counter an invasion” (39 percent) — fall short by several points. None of the rest — “send arms to Ukraine” (24 percent); “send troops to the region to bolster defenses, including to Ukraine” (19 percent); “send troops to the region to bolster defenses, but not to Ukraine” (19 percent); “avoid further foreign conflict by agreeing to Putin’s demands” (6 percent) — appeal to more than a quarter of the public.

Yet on the question of Putin’s demands for NATO to withdraw from Eastern Europe and bar Ukraine from joining the alliance, Trump voters (14 percent) are nearly twice as likely as Biden voters (8 percent) to describe them as “reasonable.”

So, Tucker Carlson & his listeners are having a major influence on US foreign policy

Holy fuck

We're fucking doomed.

Thanks Murdoch/Fox, you singlehandedly have fucking ruined the USA

Was that your purpose/goal?

Sorta fitting in a way that just a corperation for profit/ratings was willing to and able to Divide/Destroy the US

Corporations win and we the sane get fucking obliterated.

Fox wins.

America loses.

If you're interested, I say Putin has to either back off or be stopped by any means necessary.

He can't be allowed to succeed.
Putin will not invade Ukraine.

Save it for some other time.
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Fully agree with you. I think the US is obligated to assist any nation that is not an aggressor and is being invaded, no matter the cost.
This is fucking black & white
Support an Authoritarian regime over a Democratically elected government?
No-brainer to me.
No one ever stopped Franco/Mussolini/Hitler or Stalin & how did that work out?
Don't make the same mistake.
Fuck Putin up
He's a fucking snake
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
This is fucking black & white
Support an Authoritarian regime over a Democratically elected government?
No-brainer to me.
No one ever stopped Franco/Mussolini/Hitler or Stalin & how did that work out?
Don't make the same mistake.
Fuck Putin up
He's a fucking snake
History and wisdom says that you don't fuck around with this type of thing. Face it head-on today, or you'll suffer greatly tomorrow.

It all comes with an asterisk of *as long as independence is what the Ukrainian people want. In Crimea, they mostly wanted to be annexed, so...it's whatever. But, the percentages of Ukrainians is significantly different than Crimea, so I'd guess it's not what the masses want. I suspect many see the EU as the future and the RU as a doomed past.
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Ukraine first. Then who will be next if Putin isnt stopped? If nothing is done, its only a green light for whomever Putin decides to invade next. Stop the motherfucker at all costs. Sanction the fuck out of him. Cut off their food supply. Let them eat cake. Spare him no quarter.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”

Putin will not waste his ability to wage war on a useless invasion of Ukraine.
Nor will Biden initiate war in Ukraine.

The war everybody talks about will not happen.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
History and wisdom says that you don't fuck around with this type of thing. Face it head-on today, or you'll suffer greatly tomorrow.

It all comes with an asterisk of *as long as independence is what the Ukrainian people want. In Crimea, they mostly wanted to be annexed, so...it's whatever. But, the percentages of Ukrainians is significantly different than Crimea, so I'd guess it's not what the masses want. I suspect many see the EU as the future and the RU as a doomed past.

This is why Ukraine will not accept Russian hegemony. They don't have to. Putin won't invade.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
Fully agree with you. I think the US is obligated to assist any nation that is not an aggressor and is being invaded, no matter the cost.
In a perfect world- yea. America and the world ain't perfect.
Russia cannot let Ukraine join Nato. Its as simple as that. Hence all the demands and negotiations.
There will be no war. Russia would of just invaded a week or two ago otherwise.

Complication could be the few hundred US troops in Ukraine. If one of those dies then will the US use that as an excuse to go in boots and all IF Russia invades?

Did you know Russia wanted to join Nato in the 50's? US and England said no.
 
Last edited:

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Putin will not invade Ukraine.

Save it for some other time.
Now with the backing of China, I think Putin will take the opportunity, a once in a lifetime opportunity, to expand into Ukraine.
China has agreed to allowing a 40% increase in gas supply thru the Trans-Siberian pipeline, almost negating the effects of an EU embargo on Russian gas.
1st thing, and I don't think but know that Trump, as fucking always fucked it up & started this ball rolling.,
Before Trump, things weren't great between Russia/China (we've been fucking with them both for decades, deservedly so), & the US, but nothing like today.
Trump allowed Russia to take Crimea because he's a loud-mouthed cunt that Russia laughed at because Putin knew the very obvious fact that Trump was a loud-mouthed cunt & all they had to do was kiss Trumps ass/tell him he's a genius & give him a soccer ball and they could & did do whatever the fuck they wanted.
And then there's China, whom in their eyes was insulted by Trump's ineffective tariff, and one thing you do not do is cause them to lose face.
They will not forgive or forget.
So that fucking idiot Trump set the stage for all of this, the threat of the invasion of Ukraine & creating a situation that united our two main adversaries against us.
This is fucking huge.
Oh yea, & then there is the little matter of Taiwan.
If Russia takes Ukraine, say goodbye to Nationalist China.
The allure/opportunity of taking both Ukraine & Taiwan I think will be too good to pass up.
If I was a madman like Putin I would invade
He'll never get another opportunity like this.

1644403256664.png
 
Last edited:

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I think this war will be up to NATO to initiate if Putin attacks again his neighbors again.

In a perfect world- yea. America and the world ain't perfect.
Russia cannot let Ukraine join Nato. Its as simple as that. Hence all the demands and negotiations.
There will be no war. Russia would of just invaded a week or two ago otherwise.

Complication could be the few hundred US troops in Ukraine. If one of those dies then will the US use that as an excuse to go in boots and all IF Russia invades?

Did you know Russia wanted to join Nato in the 50's? US and England said no.
America may not be perfect, but right now, we might just be the one thing that is keeping Chinese elites from Peng Shuai'ing your country.
 

CCGNZ

Well-Known Member
This is all the result of Putin's recent modernization of Russia's military which started in 08, time to show off.Gen Wesley Clark claims that they are chest pumped and very arrogant about their capabilities. I believe that Russia is a key player in the looming competition w/China and if this crisis can be solved the West should convince Putin to tilt westward away from China by investing in his country and modernizing his economy. Sit him down, tell him that his country is respected but other than weaponry and petroleum is backward. We actually supplied your country in WW2 and were allied, since then mistakes have been made on both sides, bit as adversaries at lest you know the West has never attacked you,so that being said do you want to go w/the known quantity(the West) or cast your lot w/the unknown(China), your a cagey and wise man Vlad and you see how they operate. They turn poor countries into indentured servants through their Belt and Road investment con game. So Vlad you decide
 

Offmymeds

Well-Known Member
Our Ukrainian friend Sedan thinks Putin won't invade but he also thinks of Fox as an "opposition channel" & I'm influenced by propaganda. Trump f'd up the US & the EU by blowing Putin and arm-twisting our ally for his personal benefit. He threw out the leverage that protected Ukraine and gave Putin a green light.

130k that close to the border is more than military exercises. A retired Russian general speaking out is more than a hint. He talks with the other generals. He knows.

I think Putin & his oligarchs need a big taste of sanctions right now, not after an invasion. We can just call them exercises in economic policy and call Putin and critics "crazy" for suggesting their is any bad intent. The Cold War never ended. Putin stepped it up years ago with the interference in elections here & every democracy around the world, Brexit propaganda, Crimea annexation, and hacking attacks. He'd love to break NATO and have the entire globe destabilized.

We have no idea what's going on behind the scenes but, as usual Russian and American oligarchs win out. It's a game for the ultra-wealthy.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
In a perfect world- yea. America and the world ain't perfect.
Russia cannot let Ukraine join Nato. Its as simple as that. Hence all the demands and negotiations.
There will be no war. Russia would of just invaded a week or two ago otherwise.

Complication could be the few hundred US troops in Ukraine. If one of those dies then will the US use that as an excuse to go in boots and all IF Russia invades?

Did you know Russia wanted to join Nato in the 50's? US and England said no.
Russia is welcome to use sanctions and whatever other political means to pressure Ukraine from joining, but this method should not be tolerated.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
In a perfect world- yea. America and the world ain't perfect.
Russia cannot let Ukraine join Nato. Its as simple as that. Hence all the demands and negotiations.
There will be no war. Russia would of just invaded a week or two ago otherwise.

Complication could be the few hundred US troops in Ukraine. If one of those dies then will the US use that as an excuse to go in boots and all IF Russia invades?

Did you know Russia wanted to join Nato in the 50's? US and England said no.
Thank you US and England for standing up for Democracy
Pre GQP Americans all supported Democracy
 
Top