So who among you can make a legitimate argument for no government?

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
DiogenesTheWiser said:
Whaaaa? Really????

Obama was trying to end use of private prisons, and Jeff Secessions has increased it.

Obama had a lenient policy on immigration enforcement, and Trump is orchestrating huge dragnets, sweeping up American citizens in the process.

Obama had a policy of hands off when it came to pot legalization, and Jeff Secessions has doubled down on the drug war.

Typical cop believes that the "slavery is freedom" mantra Trump is preaching really works.
Click to expand...

Did Obama's budget include funding for the DEA and the continued incarceration of "pot criminals" or not ?
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Still waiting for the legitimate arguement for no government.

All I heard from so far are an ex-con lying snitch, a lying race changing sock, and a moron who thinks he shouldn't have to pay taxes.

I wonder why that is?
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Funny thing about family lineage is it assumes nobody in the family line got sired by the milkman. The likelihood of that happening increases the farther back we go.
Click to expand...
?? because of less govt. more rape...unhappy at home? why the increase?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
Still waiting for the legitimate arguement for no government.

All I heard from so far are an ex-con lying snitch, a lying race changing sock, and a moron who thinks he shouldn't have to pay taxes.

I wonder why that is?
Click to expand...

I'll type slower for you.

If no person has any right to initiate force upon another person, the entire basis of an involuntary government which purports to protect you from people who would force you is a contradiction and a fraud.


Since no person has any right to initiate force upon another person, that right is nonexistent. You with me so far dolt?

You can't create a right which doesn't exist in any person by adding more people to the equation. none of whom have any right either. It is impossible to aggregate a sum of zeroes and come up with anything besides zero.

0 + 0 to the millionth power still equals zero doesn't it ?

So, there's your mathematical proof, that an involuntary government is illegitimate. I win.


I'm still waiting for anybody to refute what I said...it's impossible.
 
Last edited:
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
?? because of less govt. more rape...unhappy at home? why the increase?
Click to expand...
False assumption. It assumes that government doesn't use rapists tactics. It does.

Also, it assumes that an out of marriage affair was not consensual, many are.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'll type slower for you.

If no person has any right to initiate force upon another person, the entire basis of an involuntary government which purports to protect you from people who would force you is a contradiction and a fraud.


Since no person has any right to initiate force upon another person, that right is nonexistent. You with me so far dolt?

You can't create a right which doesn't exist in any person by adding more people to the equation. none of whom have any right either ?

0 + 0 to the millionth power still equals zero doesn't it ?

So, there's your mathematical proof, that an involuntary government is illegitimate. I win.


I'm still waiting for anybody to refute what I said...it's impossible.
Click to expand...
TL;DR

known pedophile, known idiot, known racist.

I have to go buy some paneling. 7% sales tax to fix roads.
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'll type slower for you.

If no person has any right to initiate force upon another person, the entire basis of an involuntary government which purports to protect you from people who would force you is a contradiction and a fraud.


Since no person has any right to initiate force upon another person, that right is nonexistent. You with me so far dolt?

You can't create a right which doesn't exist in any person by adding more people to the equation. none of whom have any right either ?

0 + 0 to the millionth power still equals zero doesn't it ?

So, there's your mathematical proof, that an involuntary government is illegitimate. I win.


I'm still waiting for anybody to refute what I said...it's impossible.
Click to expand...
Enforce it. sounds good.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
How does it feel to be unable to refute the logic of an "idiot", dolt?
Click to expand...
You logic is from around 1200 AD moron.

You are absolutely fucking clueless to the complexities of the modern world with your Dick and Jane 1st grade reading primer examples.

what's the age of consent, pedophile?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
You logic is from around 1200 AD moron.

You are absolutely fucking clueless to the complexities of the modern world with your Dick and Jane 1st grade reading primer examples.

what's the age of consent, pedophile?
Click to expand...
The statutory age of consent varies from Plantation to Plantation. The actual age varies from person to person, and generally speaking the older a person is the more likely they would have developed the wherewithal to consent.


Also, regarding my example where I prove an involuntary government is contradictory. I accept your white flag of surrender. Your "logic" requires an inconsistent rationalization, thus not logic.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
The statutory age of consent varies from Plantation to Plantation. The actual age varies from person to person, and generally speaking the older a person is the more likely they would have developed the wherewithal to consent.


Also, regarding my example where I prove an involuntary government is contradictory. I accept your white flag of surrender. Your "logic" requires an inconsistent rationalization, thus not logic.
Click to expand...
The classic rationalization of a pedophile.
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
False assumption. It assumes that government doesn't use rapists tactics. It does.

Also, it assumes that an out of marriage affair was not consensual, many are.
Click to expand...
Rob Roy said:
Funny thing about family lineage is it assumes nobody in the family line got sired by the milkman. The likelihood of that happening increases the farther back we go.
Click to expand...
Wont you honor me enough to allow me to assume too? Why you want to take my rights?
 
Last edited:
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
The classic rationalization of a pedophile.
Click to expand...
Which part did you disagree with ?



I'm glad you didn't try to refute my proof that an involuntary government is illegitimate. I would have felt sorry for you trying to argue that a sum of zeroes can create a positive number.

What happened to that Diogenes guy anyway ? It didn't take him very long for him to runaway and hide.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Which part did you disagree with ?



I'm glad you didn't try to refute my proof
Click to expand...
You try to act intelligent, but you don't know the difference between distorted opinion and proof.

Hanging any racist signs today?

I'm still waiting for the age of consent. Let's stick to a 21st century answer since most of us are actually in the 21st century, OK?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
DiogenesTheWiser said:
YES!

When was there a time when human beings lived on earth and there was no government? What do we know about that time period?

Thinking society could exist without government is fantasy.
Click to expand...

If people are evil, why would you champion a system that centralizes power in the hands of a few who have legal immunity to do things which are wrong when you and I do them ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
You try to act intelligent, but you don't know the difference between distorted opinion and proof.

Hanging any racist signs today?

I'm still waiting for the age of consent. Let's stick to a 21st century answer since most of us are actually in the 21st century, OK?
Click to expand...
Then refute what I said. Prove me wrong, genius.

Flash your brilliant intellect.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
You try to act intelligent, but you don't know the difference between distorted opinion and proof.

Hanging any racist signs today?

I'm still waiting for the age of consent. Let's stick to a 21st century answer since most of us are actually in the 21st century, OK?
Click to expand...
I don't care which race is a person is. I judge people on their deeds. Fail.

So, how come you can't refute my math example of why involuntary government is illegitimate? Does simple math from the 12th century become inaccurate in the 21st century ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top