stop being mean to poor rend pawl!

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
The guy who knows went to jail for not knowing. Not saying that to be mean in any way. I hope it does not read as such.
For all I know FDD has to say this. I know what was said. I know FDD went to prison. I don't fuck with Desert Dude,but you are free to do so. Anytime he comes at me, we will have this same conversation. I think the guy is a snitch or a narc.
When you go to court, the police have to produce the evidence they have of your crimes. I believe that during that time FDD certainly had the opportunity to find out things he *did not* know prior to that.

At this point you are just trolling.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
When you go to court, the police have to produce the evidence they have of your crimes. I believe that during that time FDD certainly had the opportunity to find out things he *did not* know prior to that.

At this point you are just trolling.
check my post above yours. CI and narcs are never revealed
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
LF, give it a rest.

I know you don't like me, for a variety of reasons and that is fine. Lambast me for saying that Obama is a failure, for saying that I believe the constitution is a master piece of freedom, for saying that Trayvon died because of his own aggressive impulses. We can legitimately debate those issues.

Quit dragging FDD into this. He doesn't need the grief and you are just making yourself look foolish.
I blast you for what you are. Your writing told it all
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
When you go to court, the police have to produce the evidence they have of your crimes. I believe that during that time FDD certainly had the opportunity to find out things he *did not* know prior to that.

At this point you are just trolling.
your discovery pack won't even tell you the name of a CI or the undercover cop
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The person you claim he snitched on says it wasn't desert dude.

How much more proof do you need?

Oh you don't need proof. I guess that's why you are such good friends with buck. You take whatever he says as gospel.

Edit: the fact you will take a persons word that posts members personal info here and stalks them to other sites is pretty damning of you. I really thought you were better than that.
is deset dude, who joined a white supremacy group, only "possibly bigoted", as you have said before to describe the neo-nazi members of that group?

or is he full on racist, like you used to describe me, who outed harassed, and chased away that group?

dickhead POS.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The guy who knows is telling you that DD is 100% not involved. But, you won't listen...
kelly, what do you think about desert dude's membership in a white supremacu group?

what do you think about him telling FDD that he deserved to go to prison, and him telling me that i would do well with some federal prison time?

what are your thoughts on all of that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
LF, give it a rest.

I know you don't like me, for a variety of reasons and that is fine. Lambast me for saying that Obama is a failure, for saying that I believe the constitution is a master piece of freedom, for saying that Trayvon died because of his own aggressive impulses. We can legitimately debate those issues.

Quit dragging FDD into this. He doesn't need the grief and you are just making yourself look foolish.
why no mention of your membership in a white supremacy group?

why no mention of the fact that you always stick up for the most racist members of the forum, like sheskunk or bignbushy?

how come you always leave that shit out?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You dont know when to let things go.

I dont think FDD wants to talk about it and I am going to respect that by following his lead.
you finally found a new cause to get behind: sticking up for the forum's resident white supremacist snitch.

makes sense for you.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
you finally found a new cause to get behind: sticking up for the forum's resident white supremacist snitch.

makes sense for you.
This thread and post is a perfect example of why you have such trouble communicating with people.

Please cite where I am sticking up for DD in this thread... Cause it aint there except for in your mind you unemployed racist alcoholic forum troll.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This thread and post is a perfect example of why you have such trouble communicating with people.

Please cite where I am sticking up for DD in this thread... Cause it aint there except for in your mind you unemployed racist alcoholic forum troll.
so do you think desert dude is a shitty person who joins white supremacy groups then?

will you condemn him for joining an obvious white supremacy group?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
BULLSHIT. only thing they have to know is what was done. Not who pointed the way. confidential informants are never revealed nor most narcs
You are an idiot.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

My brother had a CI buy weed from him for over a year, his name was given to my brother as one of the witnesses against him.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You do realize that anyone who accuses you of a crime must be revealed to you right? i.e. if someone snitches on you and you have to go to court, they MUST tell you who that snitch is, its called the confrontation clause of the 6th amendment to the US Constitution.
You should learn to internet better instead of gleefully exposing your ignorance.
not true. http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/learning-the-identity-confidential-informant.html
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/learning-the-identity-confidential-informant.html

Information the Prosecution Has to Share With a Criminal Defendant
In a criminal case, the prosecution must disclose information that forms the basis of its case. This process is called discovery. A defendant is entitled to the names and statements of the witnesses that the prosecution plans to call, as well as a list of physical evidence and documents. The prosecution must also disclose any deal it has offered to a witness in exchange for testifying. While normally prosecutors have to disclose all witnesses who are relevant to the case whether or not those witnesses will testify, they often don’t have to reveal the identity of confidential informants (CIs).
 
Top