Straights only water fountain

travisw said:
You inferred blind alliance from two sentences? Is that you Clayton? It doesn't seem crazy enough to be the Aussie, but who knows.

Listen, I'd be the last guy to try and talk you out of doing the same stupid, stalking shit that got you banned last time, but I'm totally not worth your energy.
I'm old and I have a job. I don't really post that much and with all the racism and generalized nonsense, from folks like you, I stop by here less and less. If you did happen to write something surprisingly witty, there's a decent chance I wouldn't even see it.

Shit, by all means, tell your friends you really schooled some old guy on the internet if that's your thing.

You should go back to "totally winning" that argument with Buck, Canndo, and KP. I think you almost had them.
Click to expand...

Racism? What racism?
 
UncleBuck said:
so you're telling me there's no LEGAL PROTECTION for gay marriages, eh?

:lol:



show me the last person arrested and imprisoned for jaywalking.
Click to expand...

The difference between jaywalking and 2 homosexuals getting married is that one is illegal.
 
UncleBuck said:
well, it's not that bad. but still, the south is leading the way again.

http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/story/2...roduces-turn-the-gays-away-bill#axzz2t9MvfCf1

well played, south.
Click to expand...

anyone who turns away same-sex couples disgust me..religion my ass.

i've had the opportunity to work with same-sex couples and these are my findings:

1. they are hands down.. the single most nicest people to work for
2. they have money..lots of money
3. they always go full boat on everything = they spend
4. they are loyal and refer their friends
5. see #1

hey whitey righty racist..this is where you cut off your nose to spite your face..doit, doit, doit..pleeeeease?..more for me:mrgreen:

EDIT: whitey righty racist is by far the cheap ass "give me your best deal" group..i wish i could verbalize what we think when you say that:lol:
 
UncleBuck said:
why bother? hate obviously appeals to you. nothing much you can do to change that, that's just the type of person you are.
Click to expand...


If you hate a person and take actions against them such as assault, fraud, damage or steal their justly acquired property, the "crime" isn't the "hate", it is the act you took against them. In that case, the person that suffered an actionable loss, deserves to be restituted.

Failing to invite or welcome a person onto YOUR property, is not an actionable crime, it is a neutral position, in that the owner is exercising their right of ownership of THEIR property, but they are not depriving the unwelcome person of any rights to use their own property.

Hating a person, due to race, sexual preference or religion is not an actionable crime. Are you advocating "thought crimes" ?

When a person owns property and they do not control it, somebody else has deprived them of the right of ownership. That issue never seems to get addressed by you, why?
 
Rob Roy said:
If you hate a person and take actions against them such as assault, fraud, damage or steal their justly acquired property, the "crime" isn't the "hate", it is the act you took against them. In that case, the person that suffered an actionable loss, deserves to be restituted.

Failing to invite or welcome a person onto YOUR property, is not an actionable crime, it is a neutral position, in that the owner is exercising their right of ownership of THEIR property, but they are not depriving the unwelcome person of any rights to use their own property.

Hating a person, due to race, sexual preference or religion is not an actionable crime. Are you advocating "thought crimes" ?

When a person owns property and they do not control it, somebody else has deprived them of the right of ownership. That issue never seems to get addressed by you, why?
Click to expand...

we get it rob.

you're against civil rights, you repeatedly call the president a "mulatto", and you complain about how black people want "special rights".

all this is well documented, you don't need to keep reminding us that you are a racist old coot.

just go jerk off to lysander spooner in a corner and leave the rest of us alone.
 
schuylaar said:
anyone who turns away same-sex couples disgust me..religion my ass.

i've had the opportunity to work with same-sex couples and these are my findings:

1. they are hands down.. the single most nicest people to work for
2. they have money..lots of money
3. they always go full boat on everything = they spend
4. they are loyal and refer their friends
5. see #1

hey whitey righty racist..this is where you cut off your nose to spite your face..doit, doit, doit..pleeeeease?..more for me:mrgreen:

EDIT: whitey righty racist is by far the cheap ass "give me your best deal" group..i wish i could verbalize what we think when you say that:lol:
Click to expand...


I would prefer not to religion your ass, your offer is declined.
 
racerboy71 said:
did i just step into a time machine when opening this thread??

i can understand knowing that a couple were gay when ordering a cake for a wedding, but other then that, how exactly would one know a person were gay to refuse them any sort of service? do they need to perform a sexual act in the bakery before being removed or refused service, or does having a high voice and a funky walk qualify? i'm rather curious..
Click to expand...

No, no..they just have to wear their gaydar and they can just "tell":wink:
 
UncleBuck said:
we get it rob.

you're against civil rights, you repeatedly call the president a "mulatto", and you complain about how black people want "special rights".

all this is well documented, you don't need to keep reminding us that you are a racist old coot.

just go jerk off to lysander spooner in a corner and leave the rest of us alone.
Click to expand...

Rob is your bitch, commie.
 
Rob Roy said:
If you hate a person and take actions against them such as assault, fraud, damage or steal their justly acquired property, the "crime" isn't the "hate", it is the act you took against them. In that case, the person that suffered an actionable loss, deserves to be restituted.

Failing to invite or welcome a person onto YOUR property, is not an actionable crime, it is a neutral position, in that the owner is exercising their right of ownership of THEIR property, but they are not depriving the unwelcome person of any rights to use their own property.

Hating a person, due to race, sexual preference or religion is not an actionable crime. Are you advocating "thought crimes" ?

When a person owns property and they do not control it, somebody else has deprived them of the right of ownership. That issue never seems to get addressed by you, why?
Click to expand...

the difference between a store open to the public and a private club, even though obviously the owner of each owns them, is that one is open to the public, and one is private, and they can set rules and do as they see fit, but owning and operating a public business, you're not allowed to discriminate against anyone who makes up the part of the public..
just because you own the business, so long as it's open to the public and not some private club, you have to follow the laws of the land.. don't want to sell cakes to gays, go open up a private club where you only sell cakes to who ever you see fit..
 
jahbrudda said:
May I offer some sound advice.
Have you considered giving some of your accumulated posts to other members as an incentive to participate in your unimaginative threads?
It just very well may draw a few in.
Click to expand...

Ever see the video of zab judda getting knocked the fuck out?
 
NoDrama said:
Not really, this being the first cake ever, and they been in business a long time.
But bad news is good news, ask Chick fil a
Click to expand...

the anti civil rights people keep telling me that people won't stand for that kind of bigotry and will boycott them though.

guess not.
 
UncleBuck said:
the anti civil rights people keep telling me that people won't stand for that kind of bigotry and will boycott them though.

guess not.
Click to expand...

I have to wonder what gay couple would ever go to this bakery to take advantage of the ruling? I sure as fuck wouldn't eat something made by people who were forced to prepare foodstuffs for me against their will. If it didn't contain something unspeakable, I'm sure they would make it inedible at the very least.

Just sayin.
 
Rob Roy said:
If you hate a person and take actions against them such as assault, fraud, damage or steal their justly acquired property, the "crime" isn't the "hate", it is the act you took against them. In that case, the person that suffered an actionable loss, deserves to be restituted.

why?
Click to expand...

just how do you propose that restitution be enforced? Shall the injured party ask nicely? Or will his final recourse be the your proverbial point of a government gun? You can't have it both ways, yet you continue to try.
 
So what was worse....refusal of the cake and offer of anything else in the store except a "wedding" cake...
Or the death threats to the couples children afterwards by activists?
 
twostrokenut said:
So what was worse....refusal of the cake and offer of anything else in the store except a "wedding" cake...
Or the death threats to the couples children afterwards by activists?
Click to expand...

So their action are okay because something worse happened to them? Every time people get worked up, there's a death threat. That's not to say it's okay. I just have no idea what this actually has to do with anything.
 
kpmarine said:
So their action are okay because something worse happened to them? Every time people get worked up, there's a death threat. That's not to say it's okay. I just have no idea what this actually has to do with anything.
Click to expand...

this thread has destroyed twostroke's sensitive butthole.

ya see, i asked him the other day about title II of civil rights and whether he supported it. he said he thought it was not a good idea, that it would just make racists more bitter, and no one in america would stand for that anymore, they would boycott the person who acted so foolishly, and no one would even act that foolishly with a business to run anyway.

well, it turns out that people don't boycott the bigots and the bigots don't go out of business and that businesses really do act this way, bottom line be damned.

so naturally, his sphincter is a bit rough because of all that. it's perfectly understandable that he is upset that i was right yet again.

he's been flailing wildly all over this thread, just let the bigot go into his death throes already.
 
If someone didnt want to bake me a cake I would find someone that would. I would not force the person to do it. This is where our government has overreached. It is deciding the rights of one person supersede the rights of another person.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

bignugs68
Wk6 Flwr, half branches swayed/leaning over
Replies
11
Views
601
Nutty sKunK
Nutty sKunK
R
Plant Cloning Issues, What's Going On?
2 3
Replies
41
Views
2K
medidedicated
medidedicated
D
Rockwool Block Holders
Replies
10
Views
431
DownUnderDog
D
Scotch Zukington
Hello, new guy here.
Replies
1
Views
236
BarnBuster
BarnBuster
Y
(Autos)Seedling health + General questions/Pictures provided
Replies
14
Views
1K
yaboyG
Y
Back
Top