Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
We can, but it wouldn't be appropriate here while I'm exposing Uncle Buck as a boot licking control freak and fan of prohibitionist tactics.
Oh alright, fuck it. I like older women. How's your mom doing anyway ?
Ted Nugent - Obama a Subhuman Mongrel
- Thread starter Pinworm
- Start date
We can, but it wouldn't be appropriate here while I'm exposing Uncle Buck as a boot licking control freak and fan of prohibitionist tactics.
Oh alright, fuck it. I like older women. How's your mom doing anyway ?
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Hey now,
[video=youtube;Tk-x4CwXACM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk-x4CwXACM[/video]
my mom's is one i'd like to say you couldn't afford....
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
I miss her, she's not doing so well. But, I'm still here giving her justice.
SnapsProvolone
Well-Known Member
I may not love my government but I do love my country. I prefer not to disrespect it by throwing insults at our commander and chief. It doesn't do any good, makes me and my fellow citizens look bad.
I hope Ted realizes that most of the country has moved out of the 1800's.
I hope Ted realizes that most of the country has moved out of the 1800's.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Some people don't have or want commanders. Allowing others to hold that kind of power over you is your business. Insisting that somebody holds that power over others is tyranny
personified. This "chief" Obama presides over the biggest most fucked up jail reservation / plantation in the history of the world, careful which systems you enable.
SnapsProvolone
Well-Known Member
If you don't like leadership then your fucked. Perhaps there is a deserted island somewhere for you.
Seriously thoughI don't disagree there are human rights violations happening here while we point fingers at Syria or North Korea or walmarts best buddy China.
Seriously thoughI don't disagree there are human rights violations happening here while we point fingers at Syria or North Korea or walmarts best buddy China.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Leadership that is imposed and that creates an involuntary relationship on the individuals being "lead" ceases to be leadership and becomes dictatorial, whether the "leader" is an individual or a posse or a "commander in chief" or some other made up title. Fancy titles do not grant impunity or exceptions, they do help herd the sheep though.
If you like leadership that is imposed without your consent, backed by force, you are making an argument for the removal of self determination. BTW, when a person has no right of peaceful self determination, aren't they sharing characteristics with those that are enslaved?
Whenever a person or group of persons call themselves your leader without your specific consent, your human rights are being violated. The color of the flag is irrelevant.
I sometimes buy paint at Walmart and the odd extension cord. Let's not talk about China, we'll be hungry an hour later.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Last two are that you would shed your hair, and instead of worrying about whether the "leader" is an individual or a posse or a "commander in chief" or some other made up title...you area a boss for not brininging up my problems.
Nao, I owe you.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Just for you....
Goddamnit, nao I have to tease a big hairy love into my hatred. Lawls. I'd rather hugs.
Sand4x105
Well-Known Member
So I guess what you are saying is that Ted should not be allowed to Practice Free Speech?
SnapsProvolone
Well-Known Member
He can practice it, but he should understand he makes an ass of himself and hurts his own argument and party.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Whenever two parties fight for control to be the "boss" of other people, they are making asses of themselves. That is the story of politics.
*not to be confused with the https://www.rollitup.org/politics/747617-rend-pawl-leave-me-hell.html plagiarism incident..
just another whitey righty racist roach come out to check on the carcass that was christie..
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
Laws couldn't exist without coercive force. If individuals could 'lead' themselves however they wanted, it's much more likely that your freedoms, and personal properties will be violated.
You're making an argument for total anarchy.
Depends on what you consider peaceful determination.
What about when someone is elected buy you didn't vote for them? What other solution are you suggesting other than voting, as voting will always produce 'tyranny of the majority'?
LOL
Similar threads
