The Pro Alex Jones Thread.

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
The UN deception, please watch and draw ur on conclusions. dont be a dumb shit and and cut it down unless you watch (cough jrh)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRE-N0ihqXY&feature=PlayList&p=F1D6E66EBDE74339&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=13
I don't watch youtube videos presented as evidence. And everything in my life has reinforced the fact that I'm not a 'dumb shit'. If you knew the extent of that truth, you would feel like a real moron having called me that.
 

Dolce Vita

Active Member
I don't watch youtube videos presented as evidence. And everything in my life has reinforced the fact that I'm not a 'dumb shit'. If you knew the extent of that truth, you would feel like a real moron having called me that.
well im just glad this thread does not revolve around you! in fact you are about the worst thing that ever happened to it cos all you do is contradict us without bring any evidence to disprove us whatsoever. I think we would all be glad if you left. (hint hint)
 

Cap K

Well-Known Member
sorry man

active volcanoes spew many many more tons of greenhouse gasses into the air than humans ever have
Ya'll see? This is what I'm talking about. This is how propaganda is spread and people assume that because they watched some program on the Discovery channel that sites some study that says volcanoes spew more greenhouse gas than we do. But how do we really know that.

Look, I'm no environmentalist, but I do not think it's takes a rocket scientist to figure out that if global warming is a real phenomenon then our actions of the past century and a half must be contributing factors along with volcanoes, methane gas, etc.

My points are that we must get our information from reliable sources and we must employ our common sense for deductive reasoning. Nobody is going to have all the answers, but it should'nt surprise any of us to know that if you have enough money and power you can get your point of view on television and what a powerful medium because people tend to believe what the tv tells them. Understrand that the peole pulling the strings know this and use it to their advantage every chance they get.
 

Cap K

Well-Known Member
I met a dude recently who's a dj, but he produces as well. Anyway he was telling me how he gets some of his stuff sold for use in television and I was asking him how that works. To make a long story short, he got to telling me how representatives of the government and or lobbyists representing a big corporation would pay say the history channnel to air some of their programing. I found this to be quite interesting for one because The History Channel is one of my favorites, but also because the instant he told me this it became clear to me how we are manipulated daily by television.

Take the 9/11 conspiracy for example. Theories abound and altough I have never been one to say that it was planned and executed by our government, I'll be quick to say the indications in the months leading up to were purposely ignored. So we all know about Loose Change and the many other documentaries that showed up on the net saying that is was an inside job. Well before too long The History Channel airs a two hour show aimed at debunking all of the conspiracy theories. It can be argued how convincing it was, but I though it was at the least entertaining to watch. In any event it occurred to me, in fact felt like the show was designed to sway people who would potentially become convinced by the conspiracy theorists back to believing that it was Alcaeda.

After talking to this guy I thought well what if 9/11 was an inside job? what better way to debunk theories stating otherwise than to air a program that would have experts and diagrams so official looking that we would believe them. What if...
 

Microdizzey

Well-Known Member
I met a dude recently who's a dj, but he produces as well. Anyway he was telling me how he gets some of his stuff sold for use in television and I was asking him how that works. To make a long story short, he got to telling me how representatives of the government and or lobbyists representing a big corporation would pay say the history channnel to air some of their programing. I found this to be quite interesting for one because The History Channel is one of my favorites, but also because the instant he told me this it became clear to me how we are manipulated daily by television.

Take the 9/11 conspiracy for example. Theories abound and altough I have never been one to say that it was planned and executed by our government, I'll be quick to say the indications in the months leading up to were purposely ignored. So we all know about Loose Change and the many other documentaries that showed up on the net saying that is was an inside job. Well before too long The History Channel airs a two hour show aimed at debunking all of the conspiracy theories. It can be argued how convincing it was, but I though it was at the least entertaining to watch. In any event it occurred to me, in fact felt like the show was designed to sway people who would potentially become convinced by the conspiracy theorists back to believing that it was Alcaeda.

After talking to this guy I thought well what if 9/11 was an inside job? what better way to debunk theories stating otherwise than to air a program that would have experts and diagrams so official looking that we would believe them. What if...
I'm sure we could all agree that every news channel spins news like no tomorrow. Like they each have a different opinion about something that does not need an opinion. I see it as further separation, grouping people away from each other.

I can't watch TV anymore.. it just pisses me off. I flip through channels and see the most retarded crap on the most popular stations. Discovery channel is cool, Deadliest Catch is the shit. I won't even comment on those reality shows. A person with half of a brain knows how ridiculously mind rotting that crap is.

If our govt wanted to brainwash the country, look no further than televisions. Everybody has one, and they are used daily. TV is everywhere and you will never escape those pearly white, perfect teeth and wonderful, giant smiles. Aren't they great?
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
I'm sure we could all agree that every news channel spins news like no tomorrow. Like they each have a different opinion about something that does not need an opinion. I see it as further separation, grouping people away from each other.

I can't watch TV anymore.. it just pisses me off. I flip through channels and see the most retarded crap on the most popular stations. Discovery channel is cool, Deadliest Catch is the shit. I won't even comment on those reality shows. A person with half of a brain knows how ridiculously mind rotting that crap is.

If our govt wanted to brainwash the country, look no further than televisions. Everybody has one, and they are used daily. TV is everywhere and you will never escape those pearly white, perfect teeth and wonderful, giant smiles. Aren't they great?
I agree. And we've moved beyond merely the television. Computers are the new disseminator of information - the new media outlet. Just look at Youtube.
 

jfgordon1

Well-Known Member
I agree. And we've moved beyond merely the television. Computers are the new disseminator of information - the new media outlet. Just look at Youtube.
I know you're against youtube. But it can be used for good and evil. There is some good information on there, just got to look for it...
 
K

Keenly

Guest
okay for yall that dont believe fema labor camps exist here's more evidence. FORM THE ARMY ITSELF so we know its a credible source. http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf
dude why the fuck would people be in denial?


in january there was a bill in the house discussing these camps...

ive got the proof right here, there is NO denying the fema camps

Ladies and gentlemen, i give you H.R. 645: National Emergency Centers Establishment Act



HR 645 IH


111th CONGRESS


1st Session


H. R. 645​


To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES


January 22, 2009


Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned


A BILL​


To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,



SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘National Emergency Centers Establishment Act’.



SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.

(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.


(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure--

(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;


(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;


(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and


(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.




SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AS NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.

(a) In General- Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate not fewer than 6 military installations as sites for the establishment of national emergency centers.


(b) Minimum Requirements- A site designated as a national emergency center shall be--

(1) capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster;


(2) environmentally safe and shall not pose a health risk to individuals who may use the center;


(3) capable of being scaled up or down to accommodate major disaster preparedness and response drills, operations, and procedures;


(4) capable of housing existing permanent structures necessary to meet training and first responders coordination requirements during nondisaster periods;


(5) capable of hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance needs;


(6) required to consist of a complete operations command center, including 2 state-of-the art command and control centers that will comprise a 24/7 operations watch center as follows:

(A) one of the command and control centers shall be in full ready mode; and


(B) the other shall be used daily for training; and



(7) easily accessible at all times and be able to facilitate handicapped and medical facilities, including during an emergency or major disaster.



(c) Location of National Emergency Centers- There shall be established not fewer than one national emergency center in each of the following areas:

(1) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions I, II, and III.


(2) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV.


(3) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions V and VII.


(4) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI.


(5) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions VIII and X.


(6) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX.



(d) Preference for Designation of Closed Military Installations- Wherever possible, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate a closed military installation as a site for a national emergency center. If the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense jointly determine that there is not a sufficient number of closed military installations that meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), the Secretaries shall jointly designate portions of existing military installations other than closed military installations as national emergency centers.


(e) Transfer of Control of Closed Military Installations- If a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security administrative jurisdiction over such closed military installation.


(f) Cooperative Agreement for Joint Use of Existing Military Installations- If an existing military installation other than a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a cooperative agreement to provide for the establishment of the national emergency center.


(g) Reports-

(1) PRELIMINARY REPORT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site--

(A) an outline of the reasons why the site was selected;


(B) an outline of the need to construct, repair, or update any existing infrastructure at the site;


(C) an outline of the need to conduct any necessary environmental clean-up at the site;


(D) an outline of preliminary plans for the transfer of control of the site from the Secretary of Defense to the Secretary of Homeland Security, if necessary under subsection (e); and


(E) an outline of preliminary plans for entering into a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f).



(2) UPDATE REPORT- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site--

(A) an update on the information contained in the report as required by paragraph (1);


(B) an outline of the progress made toward the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);


(C) an outline of the progress made toward entering a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and


(D) recommendations regarding any authorizations and appropriations that may be necessary to provide for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.



(3) FINAL REPORT- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site--

(A) finalized information detailing the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);


(B) the finalized cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and


(C) any additional information pertinent to the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.



(4) ADDITIONAL REPORTS- The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, may submit to Congress additional reports as necessary to provide updates on steps being taken to meet the requirements of this Act.




SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

This Act does not affect--

(1) the authority of the Federal Government to provide emergency or major disaster assistance or to implement any disaster mitigation and response program, including any program authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.); or


(2) the authority of a State or local government to respond to an emergency.




SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 to carry out this Act. Such funds shall remain available until expended.



SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act, the following definitions apply:

(1) CLOSED MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term ‘closed military installation’ means a military installation, or portion thereof, approved for closure or realignment under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) that meet all, or 2 out of the 3 following requirements:

(A) Is located in close proximity to a transportation corridor.


(B) Is located in a State with a high level or threat of disaster related activities.


(C) Is located near a major metropolitan center.



(2) EMERGENCY- The term ‘emergency’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).


(3) MAJOR DISASTER- The term ‘major disaster’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).


(4) MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term ‘military installation’ has the meaning given such term in section 2910 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).





This bill is very large, and loading it may cause your web browser to perform sluggishly, or even freeze. This is especially true for old and/or bad browsers. As an alternative you can download the PDF of the bill or read the text on THOMAS.
Continue on to the bill...​






GovTrack.us is not affiliated with the U.S. government or any other group. It is a pet project of a regular joe. (More About GovTrack) / Feedback (but not political opining) is welcome to [sorry, address shown only in JavaScript-enabled browsers]operations@govtrack.us, but I can't do your research for you, nor can I pass on messages to Members of Congress. This site is "copyleft": You are encouraged to reuse any material on this site. Developers: GovTrack is open source and support
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
okay for yall that dont believe fema labor camps exist here's more evidence. FORM THE ARMY ITSELF so we know its a credible source. http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf
Actually that doesn't really prove the existence of FEMA camps. All that states is that the military has a program where it uses inmates from participating prison facilities to do labor on military installations.

Though I do see a problem with it, in that it essentially states that such labor will not receive compensation and thus will be the equivalent of slavery. But, as those that are in prison broke the law to begin with they can't expect to receive the benefit of protection from under the law.
 

Dolce Vita

Active Member
alright yall the catilist for martial law looks like its going to be the h1n1 flu virus. DO NOT GET THE VACCINATION, it will do more harm to you then the actual flu!

[youtube]kBPwBGFXHXE[/youtube]

[youtube]ifBgri5u9c8[/youtube]

[youtube]FYHV_uGOIQ0[/youtube]

[youtube]ZiWCHoLVi-8[/youtube]

[youtube]FgIPCWAGgv0[/youtube]

[youtube]t_352UynkuY[/youtube]

[youtube]uOo9qBL9eMM[/youtube]

[youtube]uR0NMGA5tyc[/youtube]
 
Top