The public face of gun control... Michael Moore

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
yeah, he really showed me with his argument that depended on the literal impossibility of repeat DUI offenses!
When you define "responsibly" and "criminal" on the premise that the only tolerable level of alcohol in a driver is zero, you beg the question in favor of prohibition. Your argument has traction only if the zero premise is correct. Is it? cn
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
When you define "responsibly" and "criminal" on the premise that the only tolerable level of alcohol in a driver is zero, you beg the question in favor of prohibition. Your argument has traction only if the zero premise is correct. Is it? cn


sorry, you'll have to repeat the question in english.

and let's not load it up like a semi auto, either. there's no classroom full of kids to take out.
 
Top