CannaOnerStar
Well-Known Member
I think his point was that the things that are readily available straight away to plants are the vitamins etc that are not fertilisers, but additives technically. And that the fertiliser parts of kelp release slowly when enzymes break them down. And that because nutrients would need to be broken down by microbes first, its not that the nutrients are in the kelp itself, the nutrients are the things that have been broken from kelp by bacteria through biochemical reactions over time.N, K, sulfur, mag, cal, sodium, boron, manganese, copper, zinc.........
Correct me if im wrong
Like is a whole fish head an nutrient? Not really, but when it gets composted by bacteria, there is nutrients coming out as a result. But could we say that fish meal is a slow release fertiliser? Well sure i think we could say that, but its a silly thing to argue about imo if we all know what it does and how it does it
Last edited: