Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
the way of the squirrel is big with this one
"Squirrel-style" kung-fu
the way of the squirrel is big with this one
I get it
I put it on ignore![]()
Kinda like claiming you are for liberty and freedom then banning books and forcing businesses to comply with your demands ?O Keefe and project Veritas, hahahaha, Jesus fucking christ that's an embarrassing place to use as the basis of your views.
O Keefe and project Veritas, hahahaha, Jesus fucking christ that's an embarrassing place to use as the basis of your views.
That's the world that we live in these days. If someone's "political opponent" puts out information which shines a negative light onto something they support, the information is simply tacitly dismissed as disinformation from "the other side", without even looking into the content at all.right because them recording a Pfizer employee saying what he said isn’t what I’m concerned about. I’m not at all interested in questioning a pharmaceutical companies motives ever - or any form of government authority. I’m just a peasant who follows orders
Herd immunity with smallpox and natives worked out well I hearThere are two problems with your thought process. One, you assume all viruses act the same and two, you fail to recognize these vaccines were developed over two decades and they were most definitely put through trials.
I’m with Budley, I’m tired of talking about it. People can take the vaccine or not, I don’t care anymore.
Ok... I know I have said that I just don't trust the science (early science). Sooo... they had a little over 43,000 participants with no long term testing, and some not even on humans. What's the math on that amongst 9B people?... insignificant. It's kinda like your drug buddy making a synthetic MDMA in his bathroom and tells you that its safe and effective. "A few of my friends have tried it, and say it's the bomb! One dude can't see out of his left eye anymore, but you'll be fine.... he must of had a mini stroke or something, totally unrelated"
Ok... I know I have said that I just don't trust the science (early science). Sooo... they had a little over 43,000 participants with no long term testing, and some not even on humans. What's the math on that amongst 9B people?... insignificant. It's kinda like your drug buddy making a synthetic MDMA in his bathroom and tells you that its safe and effective. "A few of my friends have tried it, and say it's the bomb! One dude can't see out of his left eye anymore, but you'll be fine.... he must of had a mini stroke or something, totally unrelated"
Enough to know I made the right decision.You've obviously done your own research
It's utterly amazing to me that shaming people for doing their own research, is somehow an acceptable action in modern society.You've obviously done your own research
It amazes me how some people always feel cheated or victimizedIt's utterly amazing to me that shaming people for doing their own research, is somehow an acceptable action in modern society.
The only ones who should feel cheated or victimized are the one who were cheated and victimized.It amazes me how some people always feel cheated or victimized
Just seems more prevalent in a certain group too