Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Why can't both win?No. The nation and the environment are in competition. One will win.
Why can't both win?No. The nation and the environment are in competition. One will win.
a judge that claims any political party shouldn't sit well w anyone."Republican judge" doesn't really sit well with me as a concept....kind of like saying 'sadistic schoolteacher', not a title I'm very comfortable with.
Seems like the US is on track with reducing emmisions. Check my sources.You mean like a stalemate? Or a draw?
I mean the civilization of humans can't survive without the planet but is actively making it incapable of supporting a human civilization.
How does the concept of a "liberal judge" who sided with 4 "conservative judges" sit with you?"Republican judge" doesn't really sit well with me as a concept....kind of like saying 'sadistic schoolteacher', not a title I'm very comfortable with.
so now you don't even vote for republicans?Who appointed the judges? I highly doubt I voted for the presidents responsible.
Totally true. Clinton appointee was the one who flipped.
by that logic then, you should be voting for hillary.I think reducing our debt should be issue #1.
"But for his vote, this wouldn't have happened."Show me anywhere I've been a partisan hack.
then why do you vote for republicans?We think the republican judges are bad
How many times have i voted?then why do you vote for republicans?
you are making less than zero sense right now.
completely irrelevant. it is your bare naked hypocrisy i am mocking.How many times have i voted?
We think the republican judges are bad
I'm actually republican
Your idiocy is what I am mocking. Just because I hold republican views does not mean I support all republicans.completely irrelevant. it is your bare naked hypocrisy i am mocking.
There is probably a questionaire to fill out.That quote is true and not partisan. It's simple math. Prove otherwise moron. I know you don't always enjoy cock, but when you do, (not that there's anything wrong with that) is it partisan?
*crickets chirpingHow does the concept of a "liberal judge" who sided with 4 "conservative judges" sit with you?
(shrugs)
What about the concept of a "liberal judge"? You posted here for a reason. What are your thoughts on the Clinton appointed Justice . . . Breyer? You know, the one who joined with the 4 Republican appointees which made this law?"Republican judge" doesn't really sit well with me as a concept....kind of like saying 'sadistic schoolteacher', not a title I'm very comfortable with.
He did pretty good in my state. Really if Trump or Hillary get into office it's not going to be good so I will take my chances on Johnson and opt out of voting for the lesser of two evils.Hillary isn't going to prison, and voting for Sanders/Johnson is literally throwing your vote away.
Does anyone remember how many votes Ron Paul got? Yeah, me neither.
Reducing America's debt is easy; just tax corporations and the rich. They're the ones who gamed the system and bought the political system so they could legally walk away from paying their share- and we see the logical consequences of this activity in our national debt.It's hard to take care of the environment if you bankrupt the nation.
Not saying environmentalism is cause of that. If you look at the congressional budget office's forecast for our national debt (not deficit)it is easy to see we are in trouble.
I think reducing our debt should be issue #1.
That being said, I dont see why we couldn't have the government invest in our updating our energy grid to be more efficient. Replacing old lines for more efficient ones and placing devices that eliminate energy loss would be a large nationwide project that would provide jobs and income for years.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that electricity transmission and distribution losses average about 6% of the electricity that is transmitted and distributed annually in the United States.1
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/the-u-s-power-grid-is-in-need-of-a-technology-upgrade/