What are the implications of this?

Luger187

Luger187

Well-Known Member
karri0n said:
You would need a massive amount of fuel.

Also, don't forget about feeding nutrients, water, etc. You'd essentially need to set up a fully automated system with all of the nutrients, water, fuel for electricity, etc, and you would need to thoroughly test that it's reliable over a 3 month period before putting it into use. We're talking pretty expensive here. Though, if you're got the money for a time chamber, I suppose you can probably afford some lights, timers, and agricultural supplies.
Click to expand...
lol yeah time machines probably cost a pretty penny or two. it would have to be a really big box to hold all that stuff. just the tanks of water alone would take up a ton of space
 
Farfenugen

Farfenugen

Well-Known Member
Funding - and nothing more. Maybe in 10 billion years time travel might be achieved, albeit with atoms. Science is based on attaining funding and government grants. When you think of the countless billions being spent on colliders and other such grand experiments, in the end what exactly is the payoff, other than extending theories and a little bit more understanding?
 
karri0n

karri0n

Well-Known Member
blazinkill504 said:
im pretty sure they've known for a long time about certain things in space that move faster than the speed of light
Click to expand...
:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall:

No they haven't. Years back, some readings showed that neutrinos(the same particles that these latest experiments are relating to) might be, but there was a pretty wide margin for error, so the results were discarded. This time around, the data is showing a much smaller possibility of a miscalculation, and the findings are now being subjected to peer review.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
About thirty years ago there was a huge flap about jets in an active galaxy moving superluminally. It turned out to be an artifact of projection ... the way a car's headlight beams move across a wall much faster than the actual turning car. cn
 
blazinkill504

blazinkill504

Well-Known Member
karri0n said:
:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall:

No they haven't. Years back, some readings showed that neutrinos(the same particles that these latest experiments are relating to) might be, but there was a pretty wide margin for error, so the results were discarded. This time around, the data is showing a much smaller possibility of a miscalculation, and the findings are now being subjected to peer review.
Click to expand...
im pretty sure they've came to the conclusion that dark energy is moving faster than the speed of light. if light and space were movin at the same speed we would be able to see everything, but we cant we can only see as far a light has traveled to us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top