abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
False. Privately owned economic infrastructure (capitalism) makes laborers into serfs.
I know you want it that way, but I think they deserve a raise.
What do you think is an appropriate raise for someone working minimum wage?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
I know you want it that way, but I think they deserve a raise.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I dont have any employees. The people that work for my company do not work for minimum wage. The inspectors are on commission. I dont know what the secretary makes but I am sure it is more than 7 bucks an hour.
What other companies pay their employees is their business and whoever decides to work for them.
What other companies pay their employees is their business and whoever decides to work for them.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
You mean at your meth lab in Apache Junction?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
What does Community owned economic infrastructure (communism) make laborers into?
What does Government owned economic infrastructure (marxism) make laborers into?
What other economic model puts control of resources into the hands of the individual?
What country has a better economic model?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Butthurt alert!!!
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
lol so retarded
Communism means classless and stateless society and Marxism means worker owned economic infrastructure. Neither of those has ever been attempted.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
says the guy claiming that raising the minimum wage will cause companies to go bankrupt and is communism.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Why so butthurt?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it's like a perfect microcosm of the right wing mindset: too scientifically illiterate to understand that contribution won't amount to anything, yet still willing to hurt himself financially to achieve it.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Boeing pays like $27.00/hr, so irrelevant to your claim.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Don't forget to keep watching Fox News for several hours a day so I can make sport of you when you return.
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
You mentioned in another post "minimum effort for minimum wage".
With that attitude I would let you keep your job but no raise.
You reap what you sow.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
but fox news is not saying that, so i refuse to believe it.
TheHermit
Well-Known Member
I would say that applies to minimum wage employers as much as it does to employees. If you want to pay people poverty wages, then you shouldn't complain about how lazy and incompetent your workers are. You get what you pay for.
TheHermit
Well-Known Member
So the Walton family became billionaires from all that wealth trickling down from other billionaires? It didn't come from the masses of poor and middle class people who spend their money at walmart?All economics is trickle down.
Where does the money/loans/funding/paychecks come from?
It isnt called flood down and make you damn rich economics
Someone was napping through history class.
Indiann
Member
Damn.. I need to start working for you. I would love making $20 a hour.
bearkat42
Well-Known Member
Not irrelevant at all. Try and keep up here. The statement was made that the government doesn't subsidize these companies, they subsidize the employees. I merely pointed out the fact that Boeing received over $13 billion from the government. In order for my claim to be rendered irrelevant, all of that money would have to go to the employees, but we know better than that don't we?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Following is the premise under discussion:
Note in particular the following
[/QUOTE]
Any subsidy Boeing receives has nothing to do with "Taxpayers are subsidizing businesses that don't pay their employees a living wage when they utilize social safety net programs"
So, yeah, irreverent. Seems you are unable to keep up, or possibly think interjecting your chicken head.nonsequiturs is somehow relevant.