UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
they just gotta clear their decision with @chemphlegm first. he is in charge of what people do with their genitals.
What strategy should Democrats use moving forward?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
they just gotta clear their decision with @chemphlegm first. he is in charge of what people do with their genitals.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Aren't you the one who says all Democratic party candidates must agree to a set of principles, one of which is foregoing legal campaign donations from corporations and PACs? Also isn't a policy of universal healthcare for all part of that checklist for fitness to run for office as a Democrat?
Regardless, I'm hearing a lot of carping from you about how terrible the Democratic party is because they didn't pass universal healthcare coverage when the didn't have enough votes to prevent filibuster to stop it and so worked with others to arrive at a compromise that has worked well if not without issues. I'm wondering how this squares with the idea that you are such a compromising character.
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
How'd that work out from women and 3/5ths people? Besides, THAT is not a men's rights group, and you know it. They did not assemble to discuss men's rights.
Last edited:
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
No. That is not at all what I am doing. If there were a need and there weren't other groups who had legitimate complaints WRT being treated fairly, I'd probably sign up. Please. Argue MY point, not the one you'd like to be arguing.
WHY IS A MEN'S RIGHTS MOVEMENT NEEDED?
Slow down and move your lips as you read that in case it helps. Then answer. Thanks.
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Everyone has the right to assemble. Even white supremacists and misogynistic assholes. Will I applaud either one? Fuck no. I'll ridicule the shit out of fucktards in either of these groups. They're filled with idiots in both cases.
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Ahhh, so now you're sitting in judgement of who does or does not have the right to advocate for their rights.
Rights are for everyone, silly rabbit.
NO exceptions. You don't get to judge their legitimacy. It isn't for you to decide whether they have a legitimate cause.
Should they get more rights than others? No. Should their rights come before others? No. But that doesn't mean they don't get them.
What a strange and self serving bunch you are...
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Sigh. You don't even understand the argument being made. I'm done with you. The tedium level is just too high at this point. Enjoy your men's rights activism. I hope men finally get a fair shot. Wear your pink penis hat in health.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You are accurately conveying in that picture why many here object to a "men's rights" movement. Your picture that you say represents a men's rights group is of the leaders of the nation at that time. No women. Also very white. You are holding up an example of a white male dominated society. So, yeah, that's what's wrong with a men's rights group.
The feminist movement didn't take men's rights away. It freed men too.
I'm still waiting for @Padawanbater2 to explain the difference between men's rights and women's rights.
Last edited:
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Perhaps it's because you aren't explaining yourself- or maybe you're just in the wrong on this one.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I'd be happy to engage with an honest person. The problem is they're not honest. You say you're against a policy of the Israeli government, they label you anti-semetic. You say you support medicare for all, they say you're against the ACA. You say you support all people's rights, they label you as an MRA.
This is a carefully crafted tactic they employ to distract from the actual arguments being made because their arguments are not strong enough on their own to defeat them. None of them, not a single one, can carry any of their arguments through to the end without employing it.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
This does seem to be a common theme.
And it's just as dishonest as it is destructive to productive discourse.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you've literally called yourself an MRA before.
but anyhoo, let's talk policy. what do you think of bernie sanders, who is under federal criminal investigation for bank fraud, copying hillary's idea of a public option and 55+ medicare?
i like that policy! bernie is smart for adopting it.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
yeah but he has also written rape-fantasy fiction
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
don't derail us with your histrionics about bernie sanders' rape-fiction writing past. bernie sanders, who is under federal criminal investigation for bank fraud, also has good policies. like the one he stole verbatim from hillary and is now pitching instead of universal single payer.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Hey why do you hate Bernard so much that you would jump straight to histrionics and accuse him of stealing Hillary's policies? Just because he's under fraud investigation doesn't mean he's a thief! Besides, memes.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Odd that I went there. I just noticed that my white privilege allowed me to assume the dick hat should be pink. Although pink pussy hats are universal, pink dick hats are not. I scratched "pink" above and regret including it. Wow. I'm ashamed of myself. Even those of us with the best of intentions from time to time fall prey to the social conditioning we've all been subjected to. I can only imagine how that conditioning feels on the other, non-privileged side.
Similar threads
