Tiny correction: atheists don't believe there is a god; it's a much softer stance. To believe that there is no god adds positivism to the mix. I got hung up on that one previously as well, and prefer the term "antitheist" for the positivists. Imo they have moved into contrarian dogma upon embracing the positivist bit. cn
This is only a very small subset of atheists that claim there is definitively no god, which requires some faith. Atheists simply do not believe in a god...
yes but I said that a few posts ago. and is the thrust of my argument.
I gave that about 0.3 seconds of playtime.
The point was ... Dawkins isn't here. I don't think you can have a surrogate argument with him using any of us. cn
Well if you scour 'my' posts I construct my arguments without naming anyone. I don't know you well enough to presume you thoughts.
He does not say this. He rates himself a 6 on a 1-7 scale where 1 is absolute belief in a god, and 7 being absolutely sure there is no god. He does go on to say that he is also a 6 on fairies, gremlins, and gnomes. He knows he can't disprove the existence of any of these...
You misrepresented the title of the article that you posted, didn't think anyone would click on your link?
Youre a complete douche .... I put the link there so peeps would click it.
Pointing out a random grammatical or spelling mistake is pedantry.
I was referring to accusing me of intentionally posting a link and misrepresenting it because I didnt think it would be clicked.
I'm only pointing out errors, which is what I expect from others when I post here. You may want to admit when you make an error, or people may think that you're intentionally deceptive. Of all the words you could have left out of the article's title, you just happened to leave out the all important, 'Almost', which if left in proved my point, not yours. If you really want to explore your own thoughts, you may want to drop the pretense and be more honest...
I disagree, that's not a minor point...
Cool. You haven't yet admitted your errors, btw...
